Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs CoreWeave
Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against CoreWeave's 61.5 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. CoreWeave leads on transparency & trust. Both do compute gpu.
Which one, for what
Baseten B
Good for Teams that want one model behind a production endpoint with real autoscaling knobs, environments and scoped keys.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 50
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 79
- Security & auth, 82 against 74
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 90 against 80
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed
Good for Teams that already run Kubernetes and need whole multi-GPU nodes or clusters for training and dedicated inference, with a contract and IAM.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 65
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Baseten loses 5 points for them
Watch for
No self-serve route. CoreWeave's sales team approves an organisation and emails the activation link before a token can be created
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | CoreWeave | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 50 | Baseten +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 79 | Baseten +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 58 | CoreWeave +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 74 | Baseten +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Baseten +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 80 | Baseten +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 77 | CoreWeave +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.5 · B | 61.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | CoreWeave |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Baseten | CoreWeave, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | https://api.coreweave.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | Token |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under CoreWeave's Terms of Service. The Terraform provider on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 38 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2022-06-30 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-02-24 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
CoreWeave
Per-hour prices for 8-GPU H100, H200 and B200 nodes are public, the docs ship as Markdown with llms.txt and embedded OpenAPI specs, and IAM has read-only roles per service. An organisation must be approved by CoreWeave's sales team before any token exists, and no request rate limits were found in the reviewed documentation.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
CoreWeave
- Create an API access token at console.coreweave.com/tokens with an expiry and send it as
Authorization: Bearerto https://api.coreweave.com - Add GPUs by applying a NodePool resource (
compute.coreweave.com/v1alpha1) to a CKS cluster withinstanceTypeandtargetNodes.instanceTypecan't be changed afterwards - Set
targetNodesto 0 or delete the Node Pool when a job ends. Nodes are whole 8-GPU machines billed by the hour - Never pass
dry_runto the MCP toolcoreweave_kubectl_applyexpecting a preview. The reference says the parameter is ignored and the manifest is applied - Use a separate Forge API key and https://api.inference.wandb.ai/v1 for Serverless Inference. A CoreWeave API access token doesn't work there
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Baseten or CoreWeave?
Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against CoreWeave's 61.5 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. CoreWeave leads on transparency & trust.
Do Baseten and CoreWeave need an API key?
Baseten needs an API key. CoreWeave needs an access token.
Can an agent call Baseten and CoreWeave without installing anything?
Yes. Baseten has a hosted endpoint at https://api.baseten.co and CoreWeave at https://api.coreweave.com.
Are Baseten and CoreWeave open source?
Baseten is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for CoreWeave.
Other comparisons with Baseten or CoreWeave
- Baseten vs Beam
- Baseten vs Cerebrium
- Baseten vs Koyeb
- Baseten vs Lambda Cloud
- Baseten vs Modal
- Baseten vs Northflank
- Baseten vs Replicate Deployments
- Baseten vs Runpod
- Baseten vs Vast.ai
- Beam vs CoreWeave
- Cerebrium vs CoreWeave
- CoreWeave vs Koyeb
- CoreWeave vs Lambda Cloud
- CoreWeave vs Modal
- CoreWeave vs Northflank
- CoreWeave vs Replicate Deployments
- CoreWeave vs Runpod
- CoreWeave vs Vast.ai
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/baseten-vs-coreweave.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/coreweave.json - From a terminal
anchor compare baseten coreweave(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "baseten", "b": "coreweave"}at/mcp, no key