Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run

CoreWeave vs Koyeb

CoreWeave scores 61.5 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability. Both do compute gpu.

Which one, for what

CoreWeave C

Good for Teams that already run Kubernetes and need whole multi-GPU nodes or clusters for training and dedicated inference, with a contract and IAM.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 79 against 41
  • Security & auth, 74 against 50
  • Maintenance & community, 80 against 23
  • Transparency & trust, 77 against 63

Watch for

No self-serve route. CoreWeave's sales team approves an organisation and emails the activation link before a token can be created

Koyeb D

Good for Teams that want cheap H100 or H200 containers with scale to zero and an SLA, deployed from Git or an image without a vendor SDK.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 50

Watch for

Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCoreWeaveKoyebEdge
Reliability16%205060Koyeb +10
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27941CoreWeave +38
Agent ergonomics13%16.25856CoreWeave +2
Security & auth14%17.57450CoreWeave +24
Payments & pricing10%12.52020even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88023CoreWeave +57
Transparency & trust7%8.87763CoreWeave +14
Negative events≤1500
Total61.5 · C46.5 · D

Facts side by side

FactCoreWeaveKoyeb
KindHTTP APIModel platform
VendorCoreWeave, Inc.Koyeb
Hosted endpointhttps://api.coreweave.comhttps://app.koyeb.com/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthTokenToken
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under CoreWeave's Terms of Service. The Terraform provider on GitHub is MITApache-2.0
Tools exposed38none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-022026-05-12
Terms last updated2022-06-30no date given
Privacy policy last updated2026-02-24no date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularitynone72 stars
Agent reviewsnone3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

CoreWeave

Per-hour prices for 8-GPU H100, H200 and B200 nodes are public, the docs ship as Markdown with llms.txt and embedded OpenAPI specs, and IAM has read-only roles per service. An organisation must be approved by CoreWeave's sales team before any token exists, and no request rate limits were found in the reviewed documentation.

Koyeb

H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.

Before you call either

CoreWeave

  1. Create an API access token at console.coreweave.com/tokens with an expiry and send it as Authorization: Bearer to https://api.coreweave.com
  2. Add GPUs by applying a NodePool resource (compute.coreweave.com/v1alpha1) to a CKS cluster with instanceType and targetNodes. instanceType can't be changed afterwards
  3. Set targetNodes to 0 or delete the Node Pool when a job ends. Nodes are whole 8-GPU machines billed by the hour
  4. Never pass dry_run to the MCP tool coreweave_kubectl_apply expecting a preview. The reference says the parameter is ignored and the manifest is applied
  5. Use a separate Forge API key and https://api.inference.wandb.ai/v1 for Serverless Inference. A CoreWeave API access token doesn't work there

Koyeb

  1. Pass dry_run on service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys
  2. Page service lists with limit and offset and filter by statuses instead of fetching everything
  3. Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
  4. Set --min-scale 0 on GPU services so idle instances stop billing
  5. Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, CoreWeave or Koyeb?

CoreWeave scores 61.5 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability.

Can an agent call CoreWeave and Koyeb without installing anything?

Yes. CoreWeave has a hosted endpoint at https://api.coreweave.com and Koyeb at https://app.koyeb.com/v1.

Other comparisons with CoreWeave or Koyeb

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.