Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
CoreWeave vs Koyeb
CoreWeave scores 61.5 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability. Both do compute gpu.
Which one, for what
Good for Teams that already run Kubernetes and need whole multi-GPU nodes or clusters for training and dedicated inference, with a contract and IAM.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 41
- Security & auth, 74 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 23
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 63
Watch for
No self-serve route. CoreWeave's sales team approves an organisation and emails the activation link before a token can be created
Koyeb D
Good for Teams that want cheap H100 or H200 containers with scale to zero and an SLA, deployed from Git or an image without a vendor SDK.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 50
Watch for
Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | CoreWeave | Koyeb | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 60 | Koyeb +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 41 | CoreWeave +38 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 56 | CoreWeave +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 50 | CoreWeave +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 23 | CoreWeave +57 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 63 | CoreWeave +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 61.5 · C | 46.5 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | CoreWeave | Koyeb |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | CoreWeave, Inc. | Koyeb |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.coreweave.com | https://app.koyeb.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | Token | Token |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under CoreWeave's Terms of Service. The Terraform provider on GitHub is MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 38 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-05-12 |
| Terms last updated | 2022-06-30 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-02-24 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 72 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
CoreWeave
Per-hour prices for 8-GPU H100, H200 and B200 nodes are public, the docs ship as Markdown with llms.txt and embedded OpenAPI specs, and IAM has read-only roles per service. An organisation must be approved by CoreWeave's sales team before any token exists, and no request rate limits were found in the reviewed documentation.
Koyeb
H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.
Before you call either
CoreWeave
- Create an API access token at console.coreweave.com/tokens with an expiry and send it as
Authorization: Bearerto https://api.coreweave.com - Add GPUs by applying a NodePool resource (
compute.coreweave.com/v1alpha1) to a CKS cluster withinstanceTypeandtargetNodes.instanceTypecan't be changed afterwards - Set
targetNodesto 0 or delete the Node Pool when a job ends. Nodes are whole 8-GPU machines billed by the hour - Never pass
dry_runto the MCP toolcoreweave_kubectl_applyexpecting a preview. The reference says the parameter is ignored and the manifest is applied - Use a separate Forge API key and https://api.inference.wandb.ai/v1 for Serverless Inference. A CoreWeave API access token doesn't work there
Koyeb
- Pass
dry_runon service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys - Page service lists with
limitandoffsetand filter bystatusesinstead of fetching everything - Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
- Set
--min-scale 0on GPU services so idle instances stop billing - Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, CoreWeave or Koyeb?
CoreWeave scores 61.5 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability.
Can an agent call CoreWeave and Koyeb without installing anything?
Yes. CoreWeave has a hosted endpoint at https://api.coreweave.com and Koyeb at https://app.koyeb.com/v1.
Other comparisons with CoreWeave or Koyeb
- Baseten vs CoreWeave
- Baseten vs Koyeb
- Beam vs CoreWeave
- Beam vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs CoreWeave
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- CoreWeave vs Lambda Cloud
- CoreWeave vs Modal
- CoreWeave vs Northflank
- CoreWeave vs Replicate Deployments
- CoreWeave vs Runpod
- CoreWeave vs Vast.ai
- Koyeb vs Lambda Cloud
- Koyeb vs Modal
- Koyeb vs Northflank
- Koyeb vs Replicate Deployments
- Koyeb vs Runpod
- Koyeb vs Vast.ai
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/coreweave-vs-koyeb.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/coreweave.json·/api/v1/tools/koyeb.json - From a terminal
anchor compare coreweave koyeb(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "coreweave", "b": "koyeb"}at/mcp, no key