Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs Runpod
Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Runpod's 53.7 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is reliability, 45 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Baseten for
- reliability (+45)
- agent ergonomics (+8)
- security & auth (+22)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+8)
Pick Runpod for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | Runpod | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 35 | Baseten +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 81 | Baseten +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 47 | Baseten +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 60 | Baseten +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Baseten +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 82 | Baseten +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 65 | Baseten +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.7 · B | 53.7 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | Runpod |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Baseten | Runpod |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | https://api.runpod.ai/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-15 |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 314 stars, 22k npm/wk, 147k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
Runpod
Per-second billing across more than a dozen serverless GPU classes, H100 at $4.79 and A100 80 GB at $2.72 an hour. Data-centre outages of 6 to 24 hours in each of July, August and September 2026.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
Runpod
- Create a Restricted or Read Only key per endpoint for the agent, not an All key
- Use REST v2 at api.runpod.io/v2 with a Bearer header; avoid GraphQL, which puts the key in the URL
- Fetch
/runresults within 30 minutes and/runsyncresults within 1 minute, or they're gone - Call
/retryon a failed job ID rather than submitting a duplicate job - Check
/healthbefore relying on an endpoint idle for a week, since max workers drop to 0
Other comparisons with Baseten or Runpod
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/runpod.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/baseten-vs-runpod.md