Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs Replicate Deployments
Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Replicate Deployments's 63.7 (B). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is security & auth, 42 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Baseten for
- reliability (+5)
- security & auth (+42)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+20)
Pick Replicate Deployments for
- agent ergonomics (+13)
- transparency & trust (+13)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | Replicate Deployments | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 75 | Baseten +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 85 | Replicate Deployments +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 68 | Replicate Deployments +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 40 | Baseten +42 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Baseten +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 70 | Baseten +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 80 | Replicate Deployments +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.7 · B | 63.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | Replicate Deployments |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Baseten | Replicate |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | https://api.replicate.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-22 |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 9.5k stars, 634k npm/wk, 387k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
Replicate Deployments
OpenAPI file, llms.txt and an MCP server with a two-tool code mode. Private instances bill set-up and idle time, H100 at $5.49 an hour.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
Replicate Deployments
- List
GET /v1/hardwarefirst and use the returnedskuin the deployment body - Set
min_instancesto 0 for bursty work; a warm H100 bills $5.49 an hour whether called or not - Send
Prefer: waiton deployment predictions to block instead of polling - Copy outputs within an hour; API prediction data is deleted after that
- Wait for the reset time in the 429 body before retrying; prediction creates cap at 600 a minute
Other comparisons with Baseten or Replicate Deployments
- Baseten vs Beam
- Baseten vs Koyeb
- Baseten vs Lambda Cloud
- Baseten vs Modal
- Baseten vs Northflank
- Baseten vs Runpod
- Beam vs Replicate Deployments
- Koyeb vs Replicate Deployments
- Lambda Cloud vs Replicate Deployments
- Modal vs Replicate Deployments
- Northflank vs Replicate Deployments
- Replicate Deployments vs Runpod
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/replicate-deploy.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/baseten-vs-replicate-deploy.md