Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Modal vs Replicate Deployments
Modal has a score of 63.8 (B) against Replicate Deployments's 63.7 (B). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is security & auth, 28 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Modal for
- security & auth (+28)
- maintenance & community (+15)
Pick Replicate Deployments for
- reliability (+5)
- schema & documentation (+15)
- agent ergonomics (+11)
- transparency & trust (+11)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Modal | Replicate Deployments | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 75 | Replicate Deployments +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 70 | 85 | Replicate Deployments +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 68 | Replicate Deployments +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 40 | Modal +28 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 70 | Modal +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 69 | 80 | Replicate Deployments +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.8 · B | 63.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Modal | Replicate Deployments |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Modal | Replicate |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.replicate.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio | |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-22 |
| Popularity | 514 stars, 941k npm/wk, 10.1M PyPI/wk | 9.5k stars, 634k npm/wk, 387k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Modal
Scale to zero by default, per-second billing and about one-second container boots. No REST API or OpenAPI spec for deploying or invoking Functions.
Replicate Deployments
OpenAPI file, llms.txt and an MCP server with a two-tool code mode. Private instances bill set-up and idle time, H100 at $5.49 an hour.
Before you call either
Modal
- Create a proxy token and require it on every web endpoint before sharing the URL; endpoints are public by default
- Pass a list to
gpu=(for example["H100", "A100-80GB"]) so a job still runs when the first choice is unavailable - Set
scaledown_windowandmin_containersexplicitly; the defaults are 60 seconds and 0 - Use
.spawn()and poll the call ID for long work instead of holding a web request open - Keep web endpoint traffic under 200 requests a second or ask Modal to raise the limit
Replicate Deployments
- List
GET /v1/hardwarefirst and use the returnedskuin the deployment body - Set
min_instancesto 0 for bursty work; a warm H100 bills $5.49 an hour whether called or not - Send
Prefer: waiton deployment predictions to block instead of polling - Copy outputs within an hour; API prediction data is deleted after that
- Wait for the reset time in the 429 body before retrying; prediction creates cap at 600 a minute
Other comparisons with Modal or Replicate Deployments
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/modal.json·/api/v1/tools/replicate-deploy.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/modal-vs-replicate-deploy.md