Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Beam vs Replicate Deployments
Replicate Deployments has a score of 63.7 (B) against Beam's 55.5 (C). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 27 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Beam for
- security & auth (+10)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+15)
Pick Replicate Deployments for
- reliability (+20)
- schema & documentation (+27)
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- transparency & trust (+6)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Beam | Replicate Deployments | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 75 | Replicate Deployments +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 85 | Replicate Deployments +27 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 68 | Replicate Deployments +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 40 | Beam +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Beam +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 70 | Beam +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 80 | Replicate Deployments +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.5 · C | 63.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Beam | Replicate Deployments |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Beam | Replicate |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 | https://api.replicate.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-22 |
| Popularity | 1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk | 9.5k stars, 634k npm/wk, 387k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Beam
Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.
Replicate Deployments
OpenAPI file, llms.txt and an MCP server with a two-tool code mode. Private instances bill set-up and idle time, H100 at $5.49 an hour.
Before you call either
Beam
- Check the response body for
ok: falseon gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200 - Don't pipe
beam deploy --format jsonoutput into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token - Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
- Set
keep_warm_secondsdeliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call - Pass
gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"]so a job still schedules when one type is out
Replicate Deployments
- List
GET /v1/hardwarefirst and use the returnedskuin the deployment body - Set
min_instancesto 0 for bursty work; a warm H100 bills $5.49 an hour whether called or not - Send
Prefer: waiton deployment predictions to block instead of polling - Copy outputs within an hour; API prediction data is deleted after that
- Wait for the reset time in the 429 body before retrying; prediction creates cap at 600 a minute
Other comparisons with Beam or Replicate Deployments
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/beam.json·/api/v1/tools/replicate-deploy.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/beam-vs-replicate-deploy.md