Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Beam vs Vast.ai
Vast.ai scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Beam's 55.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Beam leads on payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do compute gpu.
Which one, for what
Beam C
Good for Cost-sensitive Python teams running bursty GPU functions on consumer or PCIe cards, and anyone who wants the option to self-host the same runtime.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 62
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA
Vast.ai B
Good for Cost-sensitive training, batch work and self-managed inference where the agent can search listings, set a price cap and tolerate host variance or interruption.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 55
- Schema & documentation, 78 against 58
- Security & auth, 72 against 50
Watch for
No SLA. The terms say availability is not guaranteed and the service can change without notice
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Beam | Vast.ai | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 65 | Vast.ai +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 78 | Vast.ai +20 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 57 | Beam +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 72 | Vast.ai +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Beam +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 81 | Beam +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 62 | Beam +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.5 · C | 62.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Beam | Vast.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Beam | Vast.ai Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 | https://console.vast.ai/api/v0 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary service under Vast.ai's Terms of Use Agreement. The vastai CLI and Python SDK on GitHub are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2025-06-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk | 223 stars, 33k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Beam
Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.
Vast.ai
API keys can be limited by permission category and by resource ID, the REST API has a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, and the CLI ships weekly with a skill file for coding agents. Machines belong to independent hosts, prices move with the market, rate-limit thresholds are unpublished, and there is no SLA or free tier.
Before you call either
Beam
- Check the response body for
ok: falseon gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200 - Don't pipe
beam deploy --format jsonoutput into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token - Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
- Set
keep_warm_secondsdeliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call - Pass
gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"]so a job still schedules when one type is out
Vast.ai
- Create a scoped key with
vastai create api-key --permissionsfor the agent. A default key has full account access, billing and key management included - Pass
--rawon every CLI command for JSON output, and-yonvastai destroy instance, which otherwise waits for a confirmation prompt - Register an SSH key with
vastai create ssh-keybefore creating an instance, or the host is unreachable - Destroy instances when finished. A stopped instance still bills storage, and a zero balance without a saved card leads to deletion
- Back off on HTTP 429 yourself when calling REST directly. The CLI retries 429 three times from 0.15 seconds
- Filter searches with
verified=trueor the Secure Cloud option for sensitive data, and set adph_totalprice cap
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Beam or Vast.ai?
Vast.ai scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Beam's 55.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Beam leads on payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call Beam and Vast.ai without installing anything?
Yes. Beam has a hosted endpoint at https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 and Vast.ai at https://console.vast.ai/api/v0.
Are Beam and Vast.ai open source?
Beam is open source (AGPL-3.0). No open-source release is listed for Vast.ai.
Other comparisons with Beam or Vast.ai
- Baseten vs Beam
- Baseten vs Vast.ai
- Beam vs Cerebrium
- Beam vs CoreWeave
- Beam vs Koyeb
- Beam vs Lambda Cloud
- Beam vs Modal
- Beam vs Northflank
- Beam vs Replicate Deployments
- Beam vs Runpod
- Cerebrium vs Vast.ai
- CoreWeave vs Vast.ai
- Koyeb vs Vast.ai
- Lambda Cloud vs Vast.ai
- Modal vs Vast.ai
- Northflank vs Vast.ai
- Replicate Deployments vs Vast.ai
- Runpod vs Vast.ai
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/beam-vs-vast-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/beam.json·/api/v1/tools/vast-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare beam vast-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "beam", "b": "vast-ai"}at/mcp, no key