Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Beam vs Northflank
Northflank has a score of 61.8 (C) against Beam's 55.5 (C). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is security & auth, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Beam for
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+20)
- transparency & trust (+14)
Pick Northflank for
- reliability (+10)
- schema & documentation (+23)
- security & auth (+25)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Beam | Northflank | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 65 | Northflank +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 81 | Northflank +23 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 48 | Beam +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 75 | Northflank +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Beam +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 65 | Beam +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 60 | Beam +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.5 · C | 61.8 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Beam | Northflank |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Beam | Northflank |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 | https://api.northflank.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | Token |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | none |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-24 |
| Popularity | 1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk | 19k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Beam
Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.
Northflank
OpenAPI 3.0 with over 100 paths, enums and per_page, page and cursor on every list. No scale to zero for services; minimum instances must be at least 1.
Before you call either
Beam
- Check the response body for
ok: falseon gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200 - Don't pipe
beam deploy --format jsonoutput into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token - Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
- Set
keep_warm_secondsdeliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call - Pass
gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"]so a job still schedules when one type is out
Northflank
- Issue the agent a team token under an API role limited to one project, not a personal token
- Read
x-ratelimit-remainingand waitx-ratelimit-resetseconds on a 429; the default is 1,000 calls an hour - Page lists with
per_pageup to 100 and the returnedcursorinstead of numbered pages - Use a job, not a service, for anything that finishes; services bill until paused or deleted
- Fetch any docs page with .md appended to get Markdown
Other comparisons with Beam or Northflank
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/beam.json·/api/v1/tools/northflank.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/beam-vs-northflank.md