Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Modal vs Runpod
Modal has a score of 63.8 (B) against Runpod's 53.7 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is reliability, 35 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Modal for
- reliability (+35)
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- security & auth (+8)
- payments & pricing (+10)
Pick Runpod for
- schema & documentation (+11)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Modal | Runpod | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 35 | Modal +35 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 70 | 81 | Runpod +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 47 | Modal +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 60 | Modal +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Modal +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 82 | Modal +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 69 | 65 | Modal +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.8 · B | 53.7 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Modal | Runpod |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Modal | Runpod |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.runpod.ai/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-15 |
| Popularity | 514 stars, 941k npm/wk, 10.1M PyPI/wk | 314 stars, 22k npm/wk, 147k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Modal
Scale to zero by default, per-second billing and about one-second container boots. No REST API or OpenAPI spec for deploying or invoking Functions.
Runpod
Per-second billing across more than a dozen serverless GPU classes, H100 at $4.79 and A100 80 GB at $2.72 an hour. Data-centre outages of 6 to 24 hours in each of July, August and September 2026.
Before you call either
Modal
- Create a proxy token and require it on every web endpoint before sharing the URL; endpoints are public by default
- Pass a list to
gpu=(for example["H100", "A100-80GB"]) so a job still runs when the first choice is unavailable - Set
scaledown_windowandmin_containersexplicitly; the defaults are 60 seconds and 0 - Use
.spawn()and poll the call ID for long work instead of holding a web request open - Keep web endpoint traffic under 200 requests a second or ask Modal to raise the limit
Runpod
- Create a Restricted or Read Only key per endpoint for the agent, not an All key
- Use REST v2 at api.runpod.io/v2 with a Bearer header; avoid GraphQL, which puts the key in the URL
- Fetch
/runresults within 30 minutes and/runsyncresults within 1 minute, or they're gone - Call
/retryon a failed job ID rather than submitting a duplicate job - Check
/healthbefore relying on an endpoint idle for a week, since max workers drop to 0
Other comparisons with Modal or Runpod
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/modal.json·/api/v1/tools/runpod.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/modal-vs-runpod.md