Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs Cerebrium
Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 55.3 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do compute gpu.
Which one, for what
Baseten B
Good for Teams that want one model behind a production endpoint with real autoscaling knobs, environments and scoped keys.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 48
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 70
- Agent ergonomics, 55 against 49
- Security & auth, 82 against 60
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 90 against 75
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed
Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Baseten loses 5 points for them
Watch for
disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | Cerebrium | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 48 | Baseten +32 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 70 | Baseten +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 49 | Baseten +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 60 | Baseten +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Baseten +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 75 | Baseten +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 63 | Baseten +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.5 · B | 55.3 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | Cerebrium |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Baseten | Cerebrium Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | https://rest.cerebrium.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 920 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
Cerebrium
Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
Cerebrium
- Set
disable_auth = falseincerebrium.tomlbefore deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL - Authenticate headless with
CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN.cerebrium loginopens a browser - Raise
response_grace_periodfor long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours - Send
?async=trueto get arun_idwith HTTP 202, and addwebhookEndpointbecause async calls return no result to the caller - Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and
protectedcompute bills at twice the listed rate
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Baseten or Cerebrium?
Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 55.3 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Can an agent call Baseten and Cerebrium without installing anything?
Yes. Baseten has a hosted endpoint at https://api.baseten.co and Cerebrium at https://rest.cerebrium.ai.
Are Baseten and Cerebrium open source?
Baseten is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Cerebrium.
Other comparisons with Baseten or Cerebrium
- Baseten vs Beam
- Baseten vs CoreWeave
- Baseten vs Koyeb
- Baseten vs Lambda Cloud
- Baseten vs Modal
- Baseten vs Northflank
- Baseten vs Replicate Deployments
- Baseten vs Runpod
- Baseten vs Vast.ai
- Beam vs Cerebrium
- Cerebrium vs CoreWeave
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs Lambda Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Modal
- Cerebrium vs Northflank
- Cerebrium vs Replicate Deployments
- Cerebrium vs Runpod
- Cerebrium vs Vast.ai
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/baseten-vs-cerebrium.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/cerebrium.json - From a terminal
anchor compare baseten cerebrium(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "baseten", "b": "cerebrium"}at/mcp, no key