Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run

Baseten vs Cerebrium

Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 55.3 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do compute gpu.

Which one, for what

Baseten B

Good for Teams that want one model behind a production endpoint with real autoscaling knobs, environments and scoped keys.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 48
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 70
  • Agent ergonomics, 55 against 49
  • Security & auth, 82 against 60
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 90 against 75

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed

Cerebrium C

Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where Baseten loses 5 points for them

Watch for

disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBasetenCerebriumEdge
Reliability16%208048Baseten +32
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28470Baseten +14
Agent ergonomics13%16.25549Baseten +6
Security & auth14%17.58260Baseten +22
Payments & pricing10%12.54030Baseten +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.89075Baseten +15
Transparency & trust7%8.86563Baseten +2
Negative events≤15-50
Total66.5 · B55.3 · C

Facts side by side

FactBasetenCerebrium
KindHTTP APIModel platform
VendorBasetenCerebrium Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.baseten.cohttps://rest.cerebrium.ai
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITProprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-282026-09-16
Terms last updatedno date givenno date given
Privacy policy last updatedno date givenno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk920 PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Baseten

Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.

Cerebrium

Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.

Before you call either

Baseten

  1. Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
  2. Sleep for retry_after seconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute
  3. Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
  4. Set scale_down_delay below the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes
  5. Send payloads over 256 KiB to /predict, not /async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit

Cerebrium

  1. Set disable_auth = false in cerebrium.toml before deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL
  2. Authenticate headless with CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN. cerebrium login opens a browser
  3. Raise response_grace_period for long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours
  4. Send ?async=true to get a run_id with HTTP 202, and add webhookEndpoint because async calls return no result to the caller
  5. Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and protected compute bills at twice the listed rate

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Baseten or Cerebrium?

Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 55.3 (C), and leads in every scored category.

Can an agent call Baseten and Cerebrium without installing anything?

Yes. Baseten has a hosted endpoint at https://api.baseten.co and Cerebrium at https://rest.cerebrium.ai.

Are Baseten and Cerebrium open source?

Baseten is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Cerebrium.

Other comparisons with Baseten or Cerebrium

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.