# Baseten vs Koyeb

> Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Koyeb's 47 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 67 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-koyeb
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-koyeb.md (~1,400 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-koyeb.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-koyeb.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-05

Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Koyeb's 47 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 67 points.

- Baseten: grade B, 66.7/100, rank #157 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/baseten.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/baseten.json
- Koyeb: grade D, 47/100, rank #389 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/koyeb.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/koyeb.json

## Which one, for what

Pick Baseten for reliability (+20), schema & documentation (+43), security & auth (+32), payments & pricing (+20), maintenance & community (+67).

Pick Koyeb for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Baseten | Koyeb | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 80 | 60 | Baseten +20 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 84 | 41 | Baseten +43 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 55 | 56 | Koyeb +1 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 82 | 50 | Baseten +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 20 | Baseten +20 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 90 | 23 | Baseten +67 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 67 | 68 | Koyeb +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **66.7 · B** | **47 · D** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Baseten | Koyeb |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Baseten | Koyeb |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.baseten.co` | `https://app.koyeb.com/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | Token |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-05-12 |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 72 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Baseten.** Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.

**Koyeb.** H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.

## Before you call either

### Baseten

1. Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
2. Sleep for `retry_after` seconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute
3. Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
4. Set `scale_down_delay` below the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes
5. Send payloads over 256 KiB to `/predict`, not `/async_predict`, unless support has raised the async limit

### Koyeb

1. Pass `dry_run` on service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys
2. Page service lists with `limit` and `offset` and filter by `statuses` instead of fetching everything
3. Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
4. Set `--min-scale 0` on GPU services so idle instances stop billing
5. Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it

## Other comparisons with Baseten or Koyeb

- [Baseten vs Beam](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-beam.md)
- [Baseten vs Lambda Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-lambda.md)
- [Baseten vs Modal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-modal.md)
- [Baseten vs Northflank](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-northflank.md)
- [Baseten vs Replicate Deployments](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-replicate-deploy.md)
- [Baseten vs Runpod](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-runpod.md)
- [Beam vs Koyeb](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/beam-vs-koyeb.md)
- [Koyeb vs Lambda Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koyeb-vs-lambda.md)
- [Koyeb vs Modal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koyeb-vs-modal.md)
- [Koyeb vs Northflank](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koyeb-vs-northflank.md)
- [Koyeb vs Replicate Deployments](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koyeb-vs-replicate-deploy.md)
- [Koyeb vs Runpod](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koyeb-vs-runpod.md)