Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run
folk API + MCP vs Freshsales API
folk API + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Freshsales API's 40.8 (E). Both do crm records. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 64 points.
Which one, for what
Pick folk API + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+64)
- agent ergonomics (+22)
- maintenance & community (+55)
- transparency & trust (+9)
Pick Freshsales API for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | folk API + MCP | Freshsales API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 51 | folk API + MCP +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 27 | folk API + MCP +64 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 48 | folk API + MCP +22 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 44 | Freshsales API +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 5 | folk API + MCP +55 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 74 | folk API + MCP +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 61 · C | 40.8 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | folk API + MCP | Freshsales API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | folk | Freshworks |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.folk.app/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 38 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | none |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
folk API + MCP
Dated API versions, a year's support and 6 months' deprecation notice with Deprecation and Sunset headers. MCP server in open beta since 1 July 2026.
Freshsales API
Contact upsert and bulk upsert of up to 100 records make creates safe to retry. No MCP server for Freshsales.
Before you call either
folk API + MCP
- Send
X-API-Version: 2025-06-09on every REST call - Set an
Idempotency-Keyon creates, and treat a 409IDEMPOTENCY_REQUEST_IN_PROGRESSas wait and retry - On a 429, wait until
details.retryAfter, and remember all your keys share one 600-a-minute budget - Move off the reminder endpoints to tasks before their removal on 2027-02-13
- Expect some interaction content to be hidden by the workspace's privacy rules
Freshsales API
- Build the base URL from the bundle alias shown under the API key,
https://<alias>.myfreshworks.com/crm/sales/api/ - Use
/api/contacts/upsertrather than create, so a retry updates instead of duplicating - Budget calls, since 1,000 an hour covers the whole account and 429s carry no Retry-After
- Add
include=owner,sales_accountsto pull related records in one call - Expect to see only what the key owner's role can see
Other comparisons with folk API + MCP or Freshsales API
- Attio API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- Close API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- Copper API vs folk API + MCP
- Copper API vs Freshsales API
- folk API + MCP vs HubSpot API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs HubSpot API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Streak API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Twenty API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/folk.json·/api/v1/tools/freshsales.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/folk-vs-freshsales.md