Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run
Copper API vs Freshsales API
Copper API has a score of 46.9 (D) against Freshsales API's 40.8 (E). Both do crm records. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Copper API for
- reliability (+28)
- schema & documentation (+21)
- maintenance & community (+16)
Pick Freshsales API for
- agent ergonomics (+8)
- security & auth (+17)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Copper API | Freshsales API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 79 | 51 | Copper API +28 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 48 | 27 | Copper API +21 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 40 | 48 | Freshsales API +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 27 | 44 | Freshsales API +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 21 | 5 | Copper API +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 74 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 46.9 · D | 40.8 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Copper API | Freshsales API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Copper | Freshworks |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.copper.com/developer_api/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-07-02 | none |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Copper API
Published limits of 180 requests a minute and 3 a second for bulk endpoints. No official MCP server, OpenAPI spec or llms.txt.
Freshsales API
Contact upsert and bulk upsert of up to 100 records make creates safe to retry. No MCP server for Freshsales.
Before you call either
Copper API
- Send
X-PW-AccessToken,X-PW-Application: developer_apiandX-PW-UserEmailon every call, or it fails - Set
page_sizeto 200 and stop when a page comes back short, sinceX-PW-TOTALis only an upper bound - Back off on 429 on your own clock, since no Retry-After is documented
- Narrow searches that would pass 100,000 records, which is where results stop
- Read connect fields before you update a record, because an update that omits them can delete connections
Freshsales API
- Build the base URL from the bundle alias shown under the API key,
https://<alias>.myfreshworks.com/crm/sales/api/ - Use
/api/contacts/upsertrather than create, so a retry updates instead of duplicating - Budget calls, since 1,000 an hour covers the whole account and 429s carry no Retry-After
- Add
include=owner,sales_accountsto pull related records in one call - Expect to see only what the key owner's role can see
Other comparisons with Copper API or Freshsales API
- Attio API + MCP vs Copper API
- Attio API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- Close API + MCP vs Copper API
- Close API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- Copper API vs folk API + MCP
- Copper API vs HubSpot API + MCP
- Copper API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Copper API vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Copper API vs Streak API + MCP
- Copper API vs Twenty API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- Freshsales API vs HubSpot API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Streak API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Twenty API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/copper.json·/api/v1/tools/freshsales.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/copper-vs-freshsales.md