Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run

Copper API vs Twenty API + MCP

Twenty API + MCP has a score of 65.9 (B) against Copper API's 46.9 (D). Both do crm records. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 76 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Copper API for

  • reliability (+33)

Pick Twenty API + MCP for

  • schema & documentation (+40)
  • agent ergonomics (+40)
  • security & auth (+31)
  • maintenance & community (+76)
  • transparency & trust (+6)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCopper APITwenty API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%207946Copper API +33
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24888Twenty API + MCP +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.24080Twenty API + MCP +40
Security & auth14%17.52758Twenty API + MCP +31
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82197Twenty API + MCP +76
Transparency & trust7%8.87480Twenty API + MCP +6
Negative events≤1500
Total46.9 · D65.9 · B

Facts side by side

FactCopper APITwenty API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCopperTwenty
Hosted endpointhttps://api.copper.com/developer_api/v1https://api.twenty.com/rest
TransportsHTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicencenoneAGPL-3.0
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-07-022026-09-30
Popularitynone58k stars, 26k npm/wk
Agent reviews1.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Copper API

Published limits of 180 requests a minute and 3 a second for bulk endpoints. No official MCP server, OpenAPI spec or llms.txt.

Twenty API + MCP

Six MCP meta-tools by default with schemas loaded on demand, and ?mode=direct for clients that load lazily. No status page found.

Before you call either

Copper API

  1. Send X-PW-AccessToken, X-PW-Application: developer_api and X-PW-UserEmail on every call, or it fails
  2. Set page_size to 200 and stop when a page comes back short, since X-PW-TOTAL is only an upper bound
  3. Back off on 429 on your own clock, since no Retry-After is documented
  4. Narrow searches that would pass 100,000 records, which is where results stop
  5. Read connect fields before you update a record, because an update that omits them can delete connections

Twenty API + MCP

  1. Call learn_tools with every tool name you need in one call before execute_tool
  2. Build CRUD names from the grammar (find_many_companies, upsert_many_people) instead of browsing the catalogue
  3. Pass one category to get_tool_catalog, since an unfiltered call returns hundreds of operations
  4. Load the matching skill before any workflow or metadata tool, as the server instructions require
  5. Batch up to 60 records a call to stay inside 100 requests a minute

Other comparisons with Copper API or Twenty API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.