Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run
Pipedrive API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
Twenty API + MCP has a score of 65.9 (B) against Pipedrive API + MCP's 60.6 (C). Both do crm records. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 19 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Pipedrive API + MCP for
- reliability (+7)
Pick Twenty API + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+8)
- agent ergonomics (+19)
- security & auth (+5)
- maintenance & community (+14)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pipedrive API + MCP | Twenty API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 53 | 46 | Pipedrive API + MCP +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 88 | Twenty API + MCP +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 61 | 80 | Twenty API + MCP +19 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 58 | Twenty API + MCP +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 97 | Twenty API + MCP +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 78 | 80 | Twenty API + MCP +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 60.6 · C | 65.9 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pipedrive API + MCP | Twenty API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Pipedrive | Twenty |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.pipedrive.com/api/v2 | https://api.twenty.com/rest |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | AGPL-3.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 234 stars, 72k npm/wk | 58k stars, 26k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Pipedrive API + MCP
Hosted MCP server on every plan, with actions recorded in the change log. MCP tool list not published, and the server is labelled beta.
Twenty API + MCP
Six MCP meta-tools by default with schemas loaded on demand, and ?mode=direct for clients that load lazily. No status page found.
Before you call either
Pipedrive API + MCP
- Use v2 endpoints, which cost fewer tokens than v1
- Read
x-daily-requests-leftbefore a bulk run, since a search costs 40 tokens - Send the token in the
x-api-tokenheader, never asapi_tokenin the URL - Keep under 10 search requests per 2 seconds on every plan
- Ask the user to load all Pipedrive tools in the client if an expected tool is missing
Twenty API + MCP
- Call
learn_toolswith every tool name you need in one call beforeexecute_tool - Build CRUD names from the grammar (
find_many_companies,upsert_many_people) instead of browsing the catalogue - Pass one category to
get_tool_catalog, since an unfiltered call returns hundreds of operations - Load the matching skill before any workflow or metadata tool, as the server instructions require
- Batch up to 60 records a call to stay inside 100 requests a minute
Other comparisons with Pipedrive API + MCP or Twenty API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Copper API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Copper API vs Twenty API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Twenty API + MCP
- HubSpot API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- HubSpot API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- Salesforce API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Streak API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/pipedrive.json·/api/v1/tools/twenty.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/pipedrive-vs-twenty.md