Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run
folk API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
Twenty API + MCP has a score of 65.9 (B) against folk API + MCP's 61 (C). Both do crm records. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 37 points.
Which one, for what
Pick folk API + MCP for
- reliability (+9)
Pick Twenty API + MCP for
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- security & auth (+15)
- maintenance & community (+37)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | folk API + MCP | Twenty API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 46 | folk API + MCP +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 88 | folk API + MCP +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 80 | Twenty API + MCP +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 58 | Twenty API + MCP +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 97 | Twenty API + MCP +37 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 80 | folk API + MCP +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 61 · C | 65.9 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | folk API + MCP | Twenty API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | folk | Twenty |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.folk.app/v1 | https://api.twenty.com/rest |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | AGPL-3.0 |
| Tools exposed | 38 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | none | 58k stars, 26k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
folk API + MCP
Dated API versions, a year's support and 6 months' deprecation notice with Deprecation and Sunset headers. MCP server in open beta since 1 July 2026.
Twenty API + MCP
Six MCP meta-tools by default with schemas loaded on demand, and ?mode=direct for clients that load lazily. No status page found.
Before you call either
folk API + MCP
- Send
X-API-Version: 2025-06-09on every REST call - Set an
Idempotency-Keyon creates, and treat a 409IDEMPOTENCY_REQUEST_IN_PROGRESSas wait and retry - On a 429, wait until
details.retryAfter, and remember all your keys share one 600-a-minute budget - Move off the reminder endpoints to tasks before their removal on 2027-02-13
- Expect some interaction content to be hidden by the workspace's privacy rules
Twenty API + MCP
- Call
learn_toolswith every tool name you need in one call beforeexecute_tool - Build CRUD names from the grammar (
find_many_companies,upsert_many_people) instead of browsing the catalogue - Pass one category to
get_tool_catalog, since an unfiltered call returns hundreds of operations - Load the matching skill before any workflow or metadata tool, as the server instructions require
- Batch up to 60 records a call to stay inside 100 requests a minute
Other comparisons with folk API + MCP or Twenty API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Copper API vs folk API + MCP
- Copper API vs Twenty API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- folk API + MCP vs HubSpot API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Twenty API + MCP
- HubSpot API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Salesforce API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Streak API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/folk.json·/api/v1/tools/twenty.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/folk-vs-twenty.md