Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run
Copper API vs folk API + MCP
folk API + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Copper API's 46.9 (D). Both do crm records. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 43 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Copper API for
- reliability (+24)
Pick folk API + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+43)
- agent ergonomics (+30)
- security & auth (+16)
- maintenance & community (+39)
- transparency & trust (+9)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Copper API | folk API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 79 | 55 | Copper API +24 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 48 | 91 | folk API + MCP +43 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 40 | 70 | folk API + MCP +30 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 27 | 43 | folk API + MCP +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 21 | 60 | folk API + MCP +39 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 83 | folk API + MCP +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 46.9 · D | 61 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Copper API | folk API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Copper | folk |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.copper.com/developer_api/v1 | https://api.folk.app/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 38 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-07-02 | 2026-09-15 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Copper API
Published limits of 180 requests a minute and 3 a second for bulk endpoints. No official MCP server, OpenAPI spec or llms.txt.
folk API + MCP
Dated API versions, a year's support and 6 months' deprecation notice with Deprecation and Sunset headers. MCP server in open beta since 1 July 2026.
Before you call either
Copper API
- Send
X-PW-AccessToken,X-PW-Application: developer_apiandX-PW-UserEmailon every call, or it fails - Set
page_sizeto 200 and stop when a page comes back short, sinceX-PW-TOTALis only an upper bound - Back off on 429 on your own clock, since no Retry-After is documented
- Narrow searches that would pass 100,000 records, which is where results stop
- Read connect fields before you update a record, because an update that omits them can delete connections
folk API + MCP
- Send
X-API-Version: 2025-06-09on every REST call - Set an
Idempotency-Keyon creates, and treat a 409IDEMPOTENCY_REQUEST_IN_PROGRESSas wait and retry - On a 429, wait until
details.retryAfter, and remember all your keys share one 600-a-minute budget - Move off the reminder endpoints to tasks before their removal on 2027-02-13
- Expect some interaction content to be hidden by the workspace's privacy rules
Other comparisons with Copper API or folk API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Copper API
- Attio API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs Copper API
- Close API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Copper API vs Freshsales API
- Copper API vs HubSpot API + MCP
- Copper API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Copper API vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Copper API vs Streak API + MCP
- Copper API vs Twenty API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- folk API + MCP vs HubSpot API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/copper.json·/api/v1/tools/folk.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/copper-vs-folk.md