Head to head · Crm records · October 2026 research run
folk API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
folk API + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Pipedrive API + MCP's 60.6 (C). Both do crm records. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 23 points.
Which one, for what
Pick folk API + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+11)
- agent ergonomics (+9)
- transparency & trust (+5)
Pick Pipedrive API + MCP for
- security & auth (+10)
- maintenance & community (+23)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | folk API + MCP | Pipedrive API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 53 | folk API + MCP +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 80 | folk API + MCP +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 61 | folk API + MCP +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 53 | Pipedrive API + MCP +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 83 | Pipedrive API + MCP +23 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 78 | folk API + MCP +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 61 · C | 60.6 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | folk API + MCP | Pipedrive API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | folk | Pipedrive |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.folk.app/v1 | https://api.pipedrive.com/api/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 38 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | none | 234 stars, 72k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
folk API + MCP
Dated API versions, a year's support and 6 months' deprecation notice with Deprecation and Sunset headers. MCP server in open beta since 1 July 2026.
Pipedrive API + MCP
Hosted MCP server on every plan, with actions recorded in the change log. MCP tool list not published, and the server is labelled beta.
Before you call either
folk API + MCP
- Send
X-API-Version: 2025-06-09on every REST call - Set an
Idempotency-Keyon creates, and treat a 409IDEMPOTENCY_REQUEST_IN_PROGRESSas wait and retry - On a 429, wait until
details.retryAfter, and remember all your keys share one 600-a-minute budget - Move off the reminder endpoints to tasks before their removal on 2027-02-13
- Expect some interaction content to be hidden by the workspace's privacy rules
Pipedrive API + MCP
- Use v2 endpoints, which cost fewer tokens than v1
- Read
x-daily-requests-leftbefore a bulk run, since a search costs 40 tokens - Send the token in the
x-api-tokenheader, never asapi_tokenin the URL - Keep under 10 search requests per 2 seconds on every plan
- Ask the user to load all Pipedrive tools in the client if an expected tool is missing
Other comparisons with folk API + MCP or Pipedrive API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Close API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Copper API vs folk API + MCP
- Copper API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- folk API + MCP vs HubSpot API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- folk API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Freshsales API vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- HubSpot API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/folk.json·/api/v1/tools/pipedrive.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/folk-vs-pipedrive.md