Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Browserless vs Skyvern
Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do browser automation.
Which one, for what
Browserless BB
Good for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 82 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 32
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No incidents deducted, where Skyvern loses 3 points for them
Watch for
REST and WebSocket routes take the API token as ?token= in the URL, which the docs give as the standard method
Skyvern B
Good for Agents that must finish a multi-step job on sites with logins, 2FA and forms, where stored credentials, saved workflows and cached scripts matter more than raw browser time.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 59 against 53
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 62
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
Every API key and OAuth token has full organisation authority. The docs state there are no read-only, per-endpoint or per-resource keys
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Browserless | Skyvern | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 82 | 57 | Browserless +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 88 | Browserless +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 76 | Browserless +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 59 | Skyvern +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 32 | Browserless +8 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 85 | Skyvern +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 72 | Skyvern +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | 70.4 · BB | 63.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Browserless | Skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | browserless.io, Inc. | Ikonomos Inc. (Skyvern) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://production-sfo.browserless.io | https://api.skyvern.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | SSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary | AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository |
| Tools exposed | 14 | 114 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Skyvern-AI/skyvern |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-02-27 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | 23k stars, 3.2k npm/wk, 1.6k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Browserless
An OpenAPI document, llms.txt and a 14-tool MCP server with annotations on every tool make the service easy for an agent to read, and the free plan needs no card. The API token travels in the URL query string by default, cloud tokens carry no scopes, and no machine payment route exists.
Skyvern
The hosted MCP server annotates every tool as read-only or destructive and can advertise a 29 or 32-tool subset in place of 114, and the API has a written six-month deprecation policy. Every key and OAuth token carries full organisation authority, with no read-only or scoped credential, and no request rate limits are documented.
Before you call either
Browserless
- Send the token as
Authorization: Bearerto the MCP server. On REST and WebSocket routes it goes in?token=, so keep those URLs out of logs - Close sessions as soon as the work is done. Browser time bills one unit per 30 seconds, rounded up, idle or not
- For multi-step work with
browserless_agent, setkeepSessionAlive: trueon the first call and pass the returnedsessionIdafter that. Sessions are one-shot by default since server 1.33.0 - On 429, back off and retry. It means the plan's concurrency limit or queue is full, usually from sessions left open
- Match the path to the protocol. Use
/chromiumfor CDP clients and/chromium/playwrightonly forplaywright.connect()
Skyvern
- Connect to https://api.skyvern.com/mcp/x/lean or /x/operate, or send
X-Skyvern-Scope, so the client loads 32 or 29 tools. The scope filters the list and does not limit permissions - Use a separate Skyvern organisation for each blast radius. Any key or OAuth token can read and write stored credentials and delete workflows
- Never pass passwords to
skyvern_actorskyvern_type. Store them as credentials and callskyvern_login - Set
max_stepson tasks, orx-max-steps-overrideon agent runs, to cap credits. A run that reaches the cap ends astimed_out - On 503 from POST /v1/run/agents, wait
Retry-Afterseconds. No run was created, so resubmitting is safe
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Browserless or Skyvern?
Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on security & auth and transparency & trust.
Do Browserless and Skyvern need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Browserless and Skyvern without installing anything?
Yes. Browserless has a hosted endpoint at https://production-sfo.browserless.io and Skyvern at https://api.skyvern.com/v1.
Are Browserless and Skyvern open source?
No open-source release is listed for Browserless. Skyvern is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository).
Other comparisons with Browserless or Skyvern
- Browser Use vs Browserless
- Browser Use vs Skyvern
- Browserless vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- Browserless vs Hyperbrowser
- Browserless vs Playwright MCP
- Browserless vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Browserless vs Steel
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Skyvern
- Hyperbrowser vs Skyvern
- Playwright MCP vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Skyvern
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Browserbase vs Browserless
- Browserbase vs Skyvern
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/browserless-vs-skyvern.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/browserless.json·/api/v1/tools/skyvern.json - From a terminal
anchor compare browserless skyvern(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "browserless", "b": "skyvern"}at/mcp, no key