Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Hyperbrowser vs Skyvern
Hyperbrowser scores 66.9 (B) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do browser automation. Hyperbrowser accepts x402. Skyvern doesn't.
Which one, for what
Good for Agents that need a cloud browser by the minute plus cheap fetch and search, especially wallet-holding agents with no account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 94 against 32
Also in its favour
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- No incidents deducted, where Skyvern loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The official MCP server's last npm release is 1.0.25 of 13 April 2025, and it isn't in the official MCP registry
Skyvern B
Good for Agents that must finish a multi-step job on sites with logins, 2FA and forms, where stored credentials, saved workflows and cached scripts matter more than raw browser time.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 68
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 67
- Security & auth, 59 against 44
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 79
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 64
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
Every API key and OAuth token has full organisation authority. The docs state there are no read-only, per-endpoint or per-resource keys
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hyperbrowser | Skyvern | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 57 | Hyperbrowser +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 68 | 88 | Skyvern +20 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 76 | Skyvern +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 59 | Skyvern +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 94 | 32 | Hyperbrowser +62 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 85 | Skyvern +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 72 | Skyvern +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | 66.9 · B | 63.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hyperbrowser | Skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | S2 Labs Inc. | Ikonomos Inc. (Skyvern) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.hyperbrowser.ai | https://api.skyvern.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | yes | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under S2 Labs' terms of service. The Node and Python SDKs and the MCP server are MIT, and HyperAgent is AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository |
| Tools exposed | none | 114 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Skyvern-AI/skyvern |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-02-27 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Popularity | 89k npm/wk, 73k PyPI/wk | 23k stars, 3.2k npm/wk, 1.6k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Hyperbrowser
Sessions, Fetch and Search can be bought by x402 at api.hyperbrowser.ai with USDC on Base or Solana and no account, and unit prices are public. The official MCP server was last published in April 2025, no request rate limits or SLA are published, and the privacy notice covers only the website.
Skyvern
The hosted MCP server annotates every tool as read-only or destructive and can advertise a 29 or 32-tool subset in place of 114, and the API has a written six-month deprecation policy. Every key and OAuth token carries full organisation authority, with no read-only or scoped credential, and no request rate limits are documented.
Before you call either
Hyperbrowser
- With a wallet and no key, POST to https://api.hyperbrowser.ai/x402/session and read the
PAYMENT-REQUIREDheader. Sessions are prepaid for 5 to 60 minutes with no refund - Save the x402 creation response. It holds the only copy of the connection tokens, and
managementTokenis what stops the session - Stop sessions explicitly in cleanup code. Browser time bills per second until the timeout
- Use Fetch at $0.001 a page for static pages and keep browser sessions for pages that need interaction
- Add
&keepAlive=truetowsEndpointto reconnect after a CDP disconnect. Treat that URL as a secret because it carries the session token
Skyvern
- Connect to https://api.skyvern.com/mcp/x/lean or /x/operate, or send
X-Skyvern-Scope, so the client loads 32 or 29 tools. The scope filters the list and does not limit permissions - Use a separate Skyvern organisation for each blast radius. Any key or OAuth token can read and write stored credentials and delete workflows
- Never pass passwords to
skyvern_actorskyvern_type. Store them as credentials and callskyvern_login - Set
max_stepson tasks, orx-max-steps-overrideon agent runs, to cap credits. A run that reaches the cap ends astimed_out - On 503 from POST /v1/run/agents, wait
Retry-Afterseconds. No run was created, so resubmitting is safe
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hyperbrowser or Skyvern?
Hyperbrowser scores 66.9 (B) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Do Hyperbrowser and Skyvern need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. An agent can also pay Hyperbrowser per call over x402, with no account.
Can an agent call Hyperbrowser and Skyvern without installing anything?
Yes. Hyperbrowser has a hosted endpoint at https://api.hyperbrowser.ai and Skyvern at https://api.skyvern.com/v1.
Are Hyperbrowser and Skyvern open source?
No open-source release is listed for Hyperbrowser. Skyvern is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository).
Other comparisons with Hyperbrowser or Skyvern
- Browser Use vs Hyperbrowser
- Browser Use vs Skyvern
- Browserless vs Hyperbrowser
- Browserless vs Skyvern
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Hyperbrowser
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Skyvern
- Hyperbrowser vs Playwright MCP
- Hyperbrowser vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Hyperbrowser vs Steel
- Playwright MCP vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Skyvern
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Browserbase vs Hyperbrowser
- Browserbase vs Skyvern
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hyperbrowser-vs-skyvern.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hyperbrowser.json·/api/v1/tools/skyvern.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hyperbrowser skyvern(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hyperbrowser", "b": "skyvern"}at/mcp, no key