Get an audit

Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run

Browser Use vs Hyperbrowser

Browser Use scores 77.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Hyperbrowser's 66.9 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do browser automation.

Browser UseBrowser Use · HTTP API BB77.9/100#15 of 578 HyperbrowserS2 Labs Inc. · HTTP API B66.9/100#183 of 578

Which one, for what

Browser Use BB

Good for An agent that wants to hand a whole browser task to a hosted agent and get a result back, or that needs a low-cost cloud browser over CDP, and for unattended agents that can pay by x402.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 87 against 65
  • Schema & documentation, 85 against 68
  • Agent ergonomics, 78 against 67
  • Security & auth, 59 against 44

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Open source

Watch for

The privacy policy says inputs are used to train Browser Use's AI models, with no opt-out described outside Enterprise zero data retention

Hyperbrowser B

Good for Agents that need a cloud browser by the minute plus cheap fetch and search, especially wallet-holding agents with no account.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

The official MCP server's last npm release is 1.0.25 of 13 April 2025, and it isn't in the official MCP registry

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBrowser UseHyperbrowserEdge
Reliability16%208765Browser Use +22
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28568Browser Use +17
Agent ergonomics13%16.27867Browser Use +11
Security & auth14%17.55944Browser Use +15
Payments & pricing10%12.59094Hyperbrowser +4
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87779Hyperbrowser +2
Transparency & trust7%8.86564Browser Use +1
Negative events≤1500
Total77.9 · BB66.9 · B

Facts side by side

FactBrowser UseHyperbrowser
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorBrowser UseS2 Labs Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.browser-use.com/api/v4https://api.hyperbrowser.ai
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdioHTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402yesyes
LicenceMIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of serviceProprietary service under S2 Labs' terms of service. The Node and Python SDKs and the MCP server are MIT, and HyperAgent is AGPL-3.0
Tools exposed7none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrycom.browser-use/browser-usenot listed
Last release2026-10-072026-10-08
Terms last updated2026-07-15couldn't be read
Privacy policy last updatedno date givencouldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsyescouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accessyescouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingyescouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticeyescouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waiveryescouldn't be read
Popularity117k stars, 107k npm/wk, 2.1M PyPI/wk89k npm/wk, 73k PyPI/wk

Verdicts

Browser Use

The hosted cloud accepts x402 top-ups in USDC on Base with no account or API key, and publishes prices, rate limits and three OpenAPI documents. The privacy policy says inputs are used to train Browser Use's models, API keys have no documented scopes, and no prompt-injection guidance was found in the docs.

Hyperbrowser

Sessions, Fetch and Search can be bought by x402 at api.hyperbrowser.ai with USDC on Base or Solana and no account, and unit prices are public. The official MCP server was last published in April 2025, no request rate limits or SLA are published, and the privacy notice covers only the website.

Before you call either

Browser Use

  1. Send the key as X-Browser-Use-API-Key with no Bearer prefix. A Bearer header returns 401
  2. Stop browsers with PATCH /api/v4/browsers/{id} and {"action":"stop"}. Closing CDP or the SDK client leaves the browser billing
  3. Poll GET /runs/{id}/status, not the full run, and wait for the returned Retry-After on 429, which can be 300 seconds at the edge
  4. Before resubmitting after a timeout, read the existing run's status. The server keeps running and may already have submitted a form
  5. With a wallet and no key, call x402.api.browser-use.com on /api/v2 or /api/v3 routes. A task stops with INSUFFICIENT_CREDITS if credit runs out mid-run

Hyperbrowser

  1. With a wallet and no key, POST to https://api.hyperbrowser.ai/x402/session and read the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header. Sessions are prepaid for 5 to 60 minutes with no refund
  2. Save the x402 creation response. It holds the only copy of the connection tokens, and managementToken is what stops the session
  3. Stop sessions explicitly in cleanup code. Browser time bills per second until the timeout
  4. Use Fetch at $0.001 a page for static pages and keep browser sessions for pages that need interaction
  5. Add &keepAlive=true to wsEndpoint to reconnect after a CDP disconnect. Treat that URL as a secret because it carries the session token

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Browser Use or Hyperbrowser?

Browser Use scores 77.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Hyperbrowser's 66.9 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.

Do Browser Use and Hyperbrowser need an API key?

Browser Use needs an API key. Hyperbrowser takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. An agent can also pay Browser Use per call over x402, with no account. An agent can also pay Hyperbrowser per call over x402, with no account.

Can an agent call Browser Use and Hyperbrowser without installing anything?

Yes. Browser Use has a hosted endpoint at https://api.browser-use.com/api/v4 and Hyperbrowser at https://api.hyperbrowser.ai.

Are Browser Use and Hyperbrowser open source?

Browser Use is open source (MIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of service). No open-source release is listed for Hyperbrowser.

Other comparisons with Browser Use or Hyperbrowser

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report