Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
AutoCua vs Browser Use
Browser Use scores 80.3 (A) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do browser automation. Browser Use accepts x402. AutoCua doesn't.
Best desktop and mobile app automation for AI agents · All 48 desktop comparisons
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 230 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
AutoCua E
Best for Developers who want a local agent to operate desktop apps, their own browser or phones across platforms, on a machine they control.
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Two weeks old at version 0.1.9, with no changelog file
Best for An agent that wants to hand a whole browser task to a hosted agent and get a result back, or that needs a low-cost cloud browser over CDP, and for unattended agents that can pay by x402.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 87 against 25
- Schema & documentation, 86 against 42
- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 55
- Security & auth, 69 against 38
- Payments & pricing, 90 against 60
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 65
- Transparency & trust, 66 against 42
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The privacy policy says inputs are used to train Browser Use's AI models. Self-service zero data retention covers US projects only and doesn't say what model providers keep
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability Browser Use +62
AutoCua 25
Local package. Installs from PyPI as AutoCua with Python 3.10 or later and the supported platforms stated (20). No CI runs the tests; the only workflow, use_case_label.yml, labels issues (0). GitHub issues weren't read, so the open-issue line is scored absent (0). Four tags in a week with no changelog file (5). Version 0.1.9 (0). 20 + 0 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 25.
Browser Use 87
Graded as a hosted service, on Browser Use Cloud. status.browser-use.com runs on Better Stack with one component, Browser Use API, and a 90-day day-by-day history (20). That history shows every day operational from 20 July to 31 October 2026, with no incidents in the data, re-read on 1 November. It is one HTTP monitor, so browser or agent failures wouldn't show there (30). Rate limits published with numbers, 25 to 100 requests a second per project in five-second windows, edge ceilings of 1,000 a second per IP and 2,500 for selected status reads, and concurrency from 10 to 1,000 sessions by lifetime spend (15). 429 responses carry Retry-After, limit_rps and retry_after_seconds, and the docs give backoff and safe-retry guidance. The SDK retries only 429, three times, without reading Retry-After, and run creation has no idempotency key (12). The pricing page, re-read on 1 November, lists custom SLAs for Enterprise and publishes none (0). API V4 is the current API. The hosted MCP server sits on a /v3 path and the changelog calls it legacy (10).
Schema & documentation Browser Use +44
AutoCua 42
Framework reading. No API reference or typed interface beyond run_agent's documented arguments (5 of 25). No llms.txt (0). The README says what each mode drives and where it runs, and agent_capabilities.md lists what it can do (16 of 20). Modes and device are documented strings (6 of 15). Many examples, no documented errors (10 of 15). Tags without a changelog (5 of 15). 5 + 0 + 16 + 6 + 10 + 5 = 42.
Browser Use 86
OpenAPI 3.1.0 documents for API v2, v3 and v4, the v4 one with 50 operations on 33 paths and 73 schemas on 17 October (25). llms.txt, a full-text bundle and a Markdown copy of every docs page (10). The guides say which product and API version to pick and when not to. In the v4 document four operations have no description, Create Run among them, and request fields such as task, sessionId and maxCostUsd have none. The seven MCP tools have one-line descriptions (13). Required fields are marked and there are 12 enums, but modelParams is free-form and six schemas allow any extra properties, per the 8 October check (10). Python, TypeScript and curl examples throughout, named error schemas for 402, 404 and 429, and a troubleshooting table by status code. 36 of the 50 operations document an error beyond 422, 404 on 32 and 403 on 24, though only three document 429. The 8 October note said most documented only 422, which the 8 October copy of the spec in the vendor's docs repository doesn't bear out either (13). Versioned paths /api/v2, /api/v3 and /api/v4 and a dated public changelog, newest entry 24 August 2026 (15).
Security & auth Browser Use +31
AutoCua 38
Framework reading (telemetry, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). Provider keys stored in a local folder with Chrome profiles (10 of 30). The worker tools are an allow-list with no write tool, unseen ids are refused, downloads need a yes, but on Windows the model answers UAC elevation prompts itself through a kernel driver, with no person asked (6 of 20). The scraping ruleset has a prompt-injection instruction to log page text that gives instructions (10 of 15). Runs are logged in the app, with no audit log (7 of 15). No security policy, disclosure route or advisories found (5 of 20, for the vault and certificate handling). 10 + 6 + 10 + 7 + 5 = 38.
Browser Use 69
API keys in a header, several per project, each with an optional monthly spending cap that the docs call a soft limit. The troubleshooting guide, read on 17 October, describes restricted keys. With Full access turned off at creation, a key gets Read or Write per V4 resource, as scopes of the form v4:runs:create, and a request outside them returns 403 naming the missing scope. Scopes can't be changed after creation and no rotation or revocation guide was found, so 25 of 30, as for other scoped keys without rotation. The x402 host authenticates by wallet signature (25). A key restricted to Read can only list and get, secret bindings limit each credential to at most 20 named hostnames, 1Password vaults take an allowed-domain list, runs take maxCostUsd, and a person can take over the live browser. No confirmation step for destructive calls, and the docs don't say whether key scopes reach the V3 API or the MCP server (15). Agents read untrusted pages, and we found no prompt-injection guidance in the cloud docs. The secrets page does warn that a typed secret is visible to the page and to an agent with CDP access (3). Ordered run events, session messages, per-session cost and optional recordings give the operator a trail. No audit log of key or account changes found (12). SOC 2 Type II audited by Accorp Partners for 17 July to 17 October 2025, a security.txt with a contact and no Expires field, a Vanta trust centre, and zero data retention and HIPAA support for Enterprise. No bug bounty or public advisories found (14).
Payments & pricing Browser Use +30
AutoCua 60
Free self-hosted package with nothing to buy: 0 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 60.
Browser Use 90
x402 on x402.api.browser-use.com for the V2 and V3 APIs, in USDC on Base. Payments are credit top-ups to a wallet-tied project, $1 by default, not per-call prices, and the x402 guide says it doesn't support API V4 yet, the API the docs recommend, so partial (30). Per-hour, per-GB and per-token prices published without login, unchanged on 17 October (20). $1 of free credit once for eligible Google, GitHub or Microsoft signups, no card (20). An agent with a funded wallet gets access with no account or API key. The separate agent signup endpoints are off and return 403, per the 8 October check (20).
Transparency & trust Browser Use +24
AutoCua 42
MIT (30). Says it sends data only to the chosen model provider and keeps everything else locally, and the source agrees (20 of 30). No deprecation policy (0). States no telemetry, and none was found (20). 30 + 20 + 0 + 20 = 70.
Browser Use 66
The cloud is closed with published terms, last revised 15 October 2026. The library and the SDK are MIT (20). The privacy policy, which carries no date in the text we read, says 'We use Inputs to train our AI models in order to improve the Services' and keeps data as long as necessary with no periods, re-read on 1 November. The DPA of 30 July 2026 bars use of customer personal data beyond the service, which doesn't sit easily with that. The docs' zero data retention page, last modified 24 October per the docs sitemap, says a project owner can turn it on in Cloud settings with no enterprise contract, covering US session data, with cleanup every 15 minutes, V4 results to be saved within 15 minutes, and no recordings or session history. It doesn't say what model providers keep. The zero data retention page on browser-use.com still says it 'is part of an enterprise agreement' and to email sales, re-read on 1 November. API recording is off by default. With the privacy policy's training sentence and the two zero data retention pages at odds, the statements still don't agree, so 14 stands (14). No deprecation policy found, and the terms, re-read on 1 November, still allow the service to be changed or discontinued with or without notice. The docs mark V2 as legacy and Box, Bux and Skills as retired, without dates (5). The EU page names Frankfurt AWS, Datadog EU and an OpenRouter EU route. The sub-processor list is in a Vanta trust centre we didn't read, and the DPA promises 10 days' notice of new sub-processors (12).
Agent ergonomics Browser Use +23
AutoCua 55
Framework reading. One call with a mode, provider, model and task runs a whole agent (20 of 25). A separate compression agent splices handoff summaries in, and runs are capped and stoppable (15 of 20). Permission and blocked-input errors are reported specifically, with no error reference (8 of 20). No resume or retry semantics described (2 of 20). Sensible defaults (simulators unless device is set), Python only (10 of 15). 20 + 15 + 8 + 2 + 10 = 55.
Browser Use 78
The hosted MCP server has seven compact tools. The API has a minimal status endpoint for polling, and run events take limit, an after cursor and include_output (22). Cursor and limit on runs, sessions, files and downloads, and page number and size on browsers, profiles and extensions, so two pagination styles, with status, session and metadata filters (17). Errors carry codes an agent can act on, such as api_key_monthly_spend_limit_reached with cap and spent, rate_limited with limit_rps, and domain_not_allowed with the origin. Other errors are a bare detail string (16). Cancel, session delete and workspace delete are documented as idempotent. POST /runs has no idempotency key, and the docs tell callers to check the earlier run before resubmitting. We didn't read the MCP tools' annotations (8). Only task is required to create a run, with a default model, and official SDKs cover Python and TypeScript (15).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | AutoCua | Browser Use | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 25 | 87 | Browser Use +62 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 42 | 86 | Browser Use +44 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 78 | Browser Use +23 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 38 | 69 | Browser Use +31 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 90 | Browser Use +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 82 | Browser Use +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 42 | 66 | Browser Use +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 44.3/100 | A 80.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | AutoCua | Browser Use |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Ashish Yadav and contributors (ComputerUseAgent on GitHub) | Browser Use |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.browser-use.com/api/v4 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | yes |
| Licence | MIT | MIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of service |
| Tools exposed | none | 7 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.browser-use/browser-use |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |
| Popularity | none | 117k stars, 107k npm/wk, 2.1M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
AutoCua
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
AutoCua
A capable, fast-moving open-source agent for driving desktops, browsers and phones through real input and accessibility trees, with a careful safety section. It's two weeks old, with no test CI or changelog, and on Windows the model itself decides whether to accept an admin elevation prompt.
Browser Use
The hosted cloud accepts x402 top-ups in USDC on Base with no account or API key, and API keys can be restricted per resource. x402 doesn't cover API V4, the API the docs recommend, the privacy policy says inputs are used to train Browser Use's models, and no prompt-injection guidance was found in the docs.
Before you call either
AutoCua
- pip install AutoCua, then call run_agent with a mode such as "web use" or "computer use", a provider, a model and a task
- Run it on a machine or account you can afford to lose; it drives real input and keeps logged-in browser profiles
- On Windows, don't install the Interception driver unless you accept the model deciding UAC prompts
- Set AutoCua_DATA_DIR to keep keys and profiles somewhere private
- Phones go over USB from a script; Wi-Fi only through the desktop app
Browser Use
- Send the key as
X-Browser-Use-API-Keywith no Bearer prefix on the REST API, where a Bearer header returns 401. The MCP server takesAuthorization: Bearer - Stop browsers with
PATCH /api/v4/browsers/{id}and{"action":"stop"}. Closing CDP or the SDK client leaves the browser billing - Poll
GET /runs/{id}/status, not the full run, and wait for the returned Retry-After on 429, which can be 300 seconds at the edge - Before resubmitting after a timeout, read the existing run's status. The server keeps running and may already have submitted a form
- With a wallet and no key, call x402.api.browser-use.com on
/api/v2or/api/v3routes, since x402 doesn't take V4 yet. A task stops with INSUFFICIENT_CREDITS if credit runs out
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, AutoCua or Browser Use?
Browser Use scores 80.3 (A) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Can an agent call AutoCua and Browser Use without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for AutoCua. Browser Use has a hosted endpoint at https://api.browser-use.com/api/v4.
Are AutoCua and Browser Use open source?
Yes. AutoCua is open source (MIT). Browser Use is open source (MIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of service).
Other comparisons with AutoCua or Browser Use
- agent-browser vs AutoCua
- agent-browser vs Browser Use
- Airtop vs AutoCua
- Airtop vs Browser Use
- Anchor Browser vs AutoCua
- Anchor Browser vs Browser Use
- AutoCua vs Browserless
- AutoCua vs BxPlaywright
- AutoCua vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- AutoCua vs Functionize MCP server
- AutoCua vs Hyperbrowser
- AutoCua vs Kane CLI
- AutoCua vs Lightpanda
- AutoCua vs Notte
- AutoCua vs Playwright MCP
- AutoCua vs Pomerado
- AutoCua vs Puppeteer
- AutoCua vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- AutoCua vs Robocorp
- AutoCua vs Selenium
- AutoCua vs Skyvern
- AutoCua vs Steel
- AutoCua vs TinyFish
- Browser Use vs Browserbase
- Browser Use vs Browserless
- Browser Use vs BxPlaywright
- Browser Use vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- Browser Use vs Functionize MCP server
- Browser Use vs Hyperbrowser
- Browser Use vs Kane CLI
- Browser Use vs Lightpanda
- Browser Use vs Notte
- Browser Use vs Playwright MCP
- Browser Use vs Pomerado
- Browser Use vs Puppeteer
- Browser Use vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Browser Use vs Selenium
- Browser Use vs Skyvern
- Browser Use vs Steel
- Browser Use vs TinyFish
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/autocua-vs-browser-use.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/autocua.json·/api/v1/tools/browser-use.json - From a terminal
anchor compare autocua browser-use(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "autocua", "b": "browser-use"}at/mcp, no key