Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run

agent-browser vs AutoCua

agent-browser scores 64.1 (B) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do browser automation.

Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 230 browser comparisons

Best desktop and mobile app automation for AI agents · All 48 desktop comparisons

Which one, for what

agent-browser B

Best for Coding agents with a shell that want short commands and compact snapshots.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 48 against 25
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 42
  • Agent ergonomics, 80 against 55
  • Security & auth, 67 against 38
  • Maintenance & community, 70 against 65
  • Transparency & trust, 63 against 42

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

0.39.3, 0.40.0 and 0.41.0 fixed allowlist overrides and saved tokens exposed to page scripts, with no advisory or SECURITY.md

AutoCua E

Best for Developers who want a local agent to operate desktop apps, their own browser or phones across platforms, on a machine they control.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where agent-browser loses 3 points for them

Watch for

Two weeks old at version 0.1.9, with no changelog file

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Schema & documentation agent-browser +42

agent-browser 84

Graded on the CLI and its MCP server. Every MCP tool has a JSON Schema input with additionalProperties false, and since 0.41.0 the full catalogue ships as @agent-browser/sandbox/mcp-tools.json (156 tools at 0.41.1), and agent-browser.schema.json covers the config file (25). llms.txt and a Markdown copy of each docs page at agent-browser.dev, re-read on 1 November (10). Tool descriptions are one line, such as Scroll the page or an element, with parameter descriptions that say when to omit a field. Few say when not to use a tool (12). Enums, minimums, defaults and required lists, with a free-form extraArgs string array on every tool (12). Many CLI examples and a --json result shape, with error codes such as tab_gone named in passing and no error catalogue found (10). Versioned releases and CHANGELOG.md for each (15). 25 + 10 + 12 + 12 + 10 + 15 = 84.

AutoCua 42

Framework reading. No API reference or typed interface beyond run_agent's documented arguments (5 of 25). No llms.txt (0). The README says what each mode drives and where it runs, and agent_capabilities.md lists what it can do (16 of 20). Modes and device are documented strings (6 of 15). Many examples, no documented errors (10 of 15). Tags without a changelog (5 of 15). 5 + 0 + 16 + 6 + 10 + 5 = 42.

Security & auth agent-browser +29

agent-browser 67

The tool needs no credential. Site passwords sit in a local vault encrypted with AES-256-GCM and are filled without reaching the model, while saved state files are plaintext unless a key is set (22 of 30). Domain allowlist, action policy file and confirmation for chosen action categories, all opt-in, with no restriction by default, though auto-discovered project config files can no longer set executables, browser arguments or plugins since 0.39.3 (16 of 20). Content boundary markers with a per-process nonce, output caps and a written threat model with known limitations, also opt-in (12 of 15). A local dashboard shows a command and result feed, with no persistent audit log found (7 of 15). No SECURITY.md in the repository on 1 November and no advisory on OSV, though 0.39.3, 0.40.0 and 0.41.0 fixed security flaws in the release notes. vercel.com's security.txt names HackerOne, per the 8 October check (10 of 20). 22 + 16 + 12 + 7 + 10 = 67.

AutoCua 38

Framework reading (telemetry, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). Provider keys stored in a local folder with Chrome profiles (10 of 30). The worker tools are an allow-list with no write tool, unseen ids are refused, downloads need a yes, but on Windows the model answers UAC elevation prompts itself through a kernel driver, with no person asked (6 of 20). The scraping ruleset has a prompt-injection instruction to log page text that gives instructions (10 of 15). Runs are logged in the app, with no audit log (7 of 15). No security policy, disclosure route or advisories found (5 of 20, for the vault and certificate handling). 10 + 6 + 10 + 7 + 5 = 38.

Agent ergonomics agent-browser +25

agent-browser 80

The CLI adds no tool definitions to context, and the MCP server defaults to 29 core tools with eight further profiles and paged tools/list up to 156 at 0.41.1 (22 of 25). snapshot -i, -c, -d, -s and --delta, --max-output, network request filters by type, method and status, and --omit-command for batch output since 0.40.0 (20). Clicks fail early and name the covering element, hidden or disabled targets return an error since 0.39.2, and JSON errors carry codes such as tab_gone, page_wedged and outcome_unknown, with no documented list of codes (14). readOnlyHint and openWorldHint on every tool and no destructiveHint. Since 0.39.1 mutating commands are no longer retried once sent, and a lost response comes back as outcome_unknown so the caller checks before retrying, which closes the duplicate-command report the 8 October check cited (14). Refs and defaults keep commands short. One CLI, no SDK in a second language (10). 22 + 20 + 14 + 14 + 10 = 80.

AutoCua 55

Framework reading. One call with a mode, provider, model and task runs a whole agent (20 of 25). A separate compression agent splices handoff summaries in, and runs are capped and stoppable (15 of 20). Permission and blocked-input errors are reported specifically, with no error reference (8 of 20). No resume or retry semantics described (2 of 20). Sensible defaults (simulators unless device is set), Python only (10 of 15). 20 + 15 + 8 + 2 + 10 = 55.

Reliability agent-browser +23

agent-browser 48

Scored as local software. Official npm and Homebrew packages, Homebrew at 0.41.1 on 1 November 2026 with native binaries for five platforms, but crates.io still holds 0.19.0 from 14 March 2026 while the README lists cargo install (18 of 20). Public CI runs Rust tests on Linux, macOS and Windows plus native end-to-end tests. The ten most recent runs on main, 1 to 8 October 2026, concluded in failure, per the 8 October check. GitHub's API wasn't readable on 1 November, so the current state is unchecked (10 of 25). 840 open issues and pull requests and most of the newest without a reply, per the 8 October check. The three reports it named (#2032, #2056, #2031) were fixed in 0.39.1, 0.39.2 and 0.39.4, but the current issue list couldn't be read (10 of 25). Every release has a changelog entry and breaking changes get their own heading, on a 0.x line (10 of 15). 0.41.1 with a Labs badge and no stable declaration (0). 18 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 48.

AutoCua 25

Local package. Installs from PyPI as AutoCua with Python 3.10 or later and the supported platforms stated (20). No CI runs the tests; the only workflow, use_case_label.yml, labels issues (0). GitHub issues weren't read, so the open-issue line is scored absent (0). Four tags in a week with no changelog file (5). Version 0.1.9 (0). 20 + 0 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 25.

Transparency & trust agent-browser +21

agent-browser 63

Apache-2.0, copyright Vercel Inc. (30). No privacy statement for the software. The docs say where credentials, keys and state are stored, that saved state expires after 30 days by default, and that chat goes to the Vercel AI Gateway (18 of 30). No deprecation policy. The changelog flagged the -C snapshot flag as deprecated under a Breaking Changes heading (6 of 20). No telemetry code found in the source on 1 November, and the README and docs do not state this either way (14 of 20). 30 + 18 + 6 + 14 = 68.

AutoCua 42

MIT (30). Says it sends data only to the chosen model provider and keeps everything else locally, and the source agrees (20 of 30). No deprecation policy (0). States no telemetry, and none was found (20). 30 + 20 + 0 + 20 = 70.

Maintenance & community agent-browser +5

agent-browser 70

0.41.1 on 30 October 2026 (30). 18 tagged releases in the 90 days from 3 August, 0.34.0 on 10 August to 0.41.1, read from a clone (20). 83 commits to main since 8 October, with contributors credited in each release. Of the 19 newest open issues on 8 October, 12 had no comment and none had a label; the current list couldn't be read (10 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry on 1 November, where a search for agent-browser returns only other publishers. Homebrew is current and crates.io is 22 minor versions behind (5 of 15). No runtime npm dependencies and a lockfile, with CI failing on main per the 8 October check (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 5 + 5 = 70.

AutoCua 65

v0.1.9 tagged on 4 November 2026 (30). Four tags in 90 days (20). Issues and pull requests weren't read (0 of 25). The PyPI wheel is current (15). No CI; dependencies pinned per OS in requirements files (0 of 10). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 65.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runagent-browserAutoCuaEdge
Reliability16%204825agent-browser +23
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28442agent-browser +42
Agent ergonomics13%16.28055agent-browser +25
Security & auth14%17.56738agent-browser +29
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87065agent-browser +5
Transparency & trust7%8.86342agent-browser +21
Negative events≤15-30
TotalB 64.1/100E 44.3/100

Facts side by side

Factagent-browserAutoCua
KindMCP serverAgent framework
VendorVercel LabsAshish Yadav and contributors (ComputerUseAgent on GitHub)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transportsstdio
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Tools exposed156none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-302026-11-04
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Popularity44k stars, 2.1M npm/wknone
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)none

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

agent-browser

Snapshots with element refs, a 29-tool default MCP profile and opt-in domain allowlists, action policies and content boundary markers suit agent use. The project is at 0.41.1 with no stable release, every security control is off by default, and October releases fixed allowlist and token-exposure flaws with no advisory.

AutoCua

A capable, fast-moving open-source agent for driving desktops, browsers and phones through real input and accessibility trees, with a careful safety section. It's two weeks old, with no test CI or changelog, and on Windows the model itself decides whether to accept an admin elevation prompt.

Before you call either

agent-browser

  1. Run agent-browser install once after npm install -g agent-browser. It downloads Chrome for Testing
  2. Upgrade to 0.41.0 or later before relying on --allowed-domains from MCP. Earlier tool arguments could override it
  3. Take a fresh snapshot -i after any navigation. Refs survive same-document changes only
  4. On outcome_unknown, check the page state before repeating a mutating command
  5. Set --allowed-domains, --action-policy and --content-boundaries for untrusted sites. None is on by default

AutoCua

  1. pip install AutoCua, then call run_agent with a mode such as "web use" or "computer use", a provider, a model and a task
  2. Run it on a machine or account you can afford to lose; it drives real input and keeps logged-in browser profiles
  3. On Windows, don't install the Interception driver unless you accept the model deciding UAC prompts
  4. Set AutoCua_DATA_DIR to keep keys and profiles somewhere private
  5. Phones go over USB from a script; Wi-Fi only through the desktop app

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, agent-browser or AutoCua?

agent-browser scores 64.1 (B) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Can an agent call agent-browser and AutoCua without installing anything?

agent-browser runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for AutoCua.

Are agent-browser and AutoCua open source?

Yes. agent-browser is open source (Apache-2.0). AutoCua is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with agent-browser or AutoCua

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.