Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
agent-browser vs AutoCua
agent-browser scores 64.1 (B) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do browser automation.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 230 browser comparisons
Best desktop and mobile app automation for AI agents · All 48 desktop comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Coding agents with a shell that want short commands and compact snapshots.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 48 against 25
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 42
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 55
- Security & auth, 67 against 38
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 65
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 42
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
0.39.3, 0.40.0 and 0.41.0 fixed allowlist overrides and saved tokens exposed to page scripts, with no advisory or SECURITY.md
AutoCua E
Best for Developers who want a local agent to operate desktop apps, their own browser or phones across platforms, on a machine they control.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where agent-browser loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Two weeks old at version 0.1.9, with no changelog file
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Schema & documentation agent-browser +42
agent-browser 84
Graded on the CLI and its MCP server. Every MCP tool has a JSON Schema input with additionalProperties false, and since 0.41.0 the full catalogue ships as @agent-browser/sandbox/mcp-tools.json (156 tools at 0.41.1), and agent-browser.schema.json covers the config file (25). llms.txt and a Markdown copy of each docs page at agent-browser.dev, re-read on 1 November (10). Tool descriptions are one line, such as Scroll the page or an element, with parameter descriptions that say when to omit a field. Few say when not to use a tool (12). Enums, minimums, defaults and required lists, with a free-form extraArgs string array on every tool (12). Many CLI examples and a --json result shape, with error codes such as tab_gone named in passing and no error catalogue found (10). Versioned releases and CHANGELOG.md for each (15). 25 + 10 + 12 + 12 + 10 + 15 = 84.
AutoCua 42
Framework reading. No API reference or typed interface beyond run_agent's documented arguments (5 of 25). No llms.txt (0). The README says what each mode drives and where it runs, and agent_capabilities.md lists what it can do (16 of 20). Modes and device are documented strings (6 of 15). Many examples, no documented errors (10 of 15). Tags without a changelog (5 of 15). 5 + 0 + 16 + 6 + 10 + 5 = 42.
Security & auth agent-browser +29
agent-browser 67
The tool needs no credential. Site passwords sit in a local vault encrypted with AES-256-GCM and are filled without reaching the model, while saved state files are plaintext unless a key is set (22 of 30). Domain allowlist, action policy file and confirmation for chosen action categories, all opt-in, with no restriction by default, though auto-discovered project config files can no longer set executables, browser arguments or plugins since 0.39.3 (16 of 20). Content boundary markers with a per-process nonce, output caps and a written threat model with known limitations, also opt-in (12 of 15). A local dashboard shows a command and result feed, with no persistent audit log found (7 of 15). No SECURITY.md in the repository on 1 November and no advisory on OSV, though 0.39.3, 0.40.0 and 0.41.0 fixed security flaws in the release notes. vercel.com's security.txt names HackerOne, per the 8 October check (10 of 20). 22 + 16 + 12 + 7 + 10 = 67.
AutoCua 38
Framework reading (telemetry, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). Provider keys stored in a local folder with Chrome profiles (10 of 30). The worker tools are an allow-list with no write tool, unseen ids are refused, downloads need a yes, but on Windows the model answers UAC elevation prompts itself through a kernel driver, with no person asked (6 of 20). The scraping ruleset has a prompt-injection instruction to log page text that gives instructions (10 of 15). Runs are logged in the app, with no audit log (7 of 15). No security policy, disclosure route or advisories found (5 of 20, for the vault and certificate handling). 10 + 6 + 10 + 7 + 5 = 38.
Agent ergonomics agent-browser +25
agent-browser 80
The CLI adds no tool definitions to context, and the MCP server defaults to 29 core tools with eight further profiles and paged tools/list up to 156 at 0.41.1 (22 of 25). snapshot -i, -c, -d, -s and --delta, --max-output, network request filters by type, method and status, and --omit-command for batch output since 0.40.0 (20). Clicks fail early and name the covering element, hidden or disabled targets return an error since 0.39.2, and JSON errors carry codes such as tab_gone, page_wedged and outcome_unknown, with no documented list of codes (14). readOnlyHint and openWorldHint on every tool and no destructiveHint. Since 0.39.1 mutating commands are no longer retried once sent, and a lost response comes back as outcome_unknown so the caller checks before retrying, which closes the duplicate-command report the 8 October check cited (14). Refs and defaults keep commands short. One CLI, no SDK in a second language (10). 22 + 20 + 14 + 14 + 10 = 80.
AutoCua 55
Framework reading. One call with a mode, provider, model and task runs a whole agent (20 of 25). A separate compression agent splices handoff summaries in, and runs are capped and stoppable (15 of 20). Permission and blocked-input errors are reported specifically, with no error reference (8 of 20). No resume or retry semantics described (2 of 20). Sensible defaults (simulators unless device is set), Python only (10 of 15). 20 + 15 + 8 + 2 + 10 = 55.
Reliability agent-browser +23
agent-browser 48
Scored as local software. Official npm and Homebrew packages, Homebrew at 0.41.1 on 1 November 2026 with native binaries for five platforms, but crates.io still holds 0.19.0 from 14 March 2026 while the README lists cargo install (18 of 20). Public CI runs Rust tests on Linux, macOS and Windows plus native end-to-end tests. The ten most recent runs on main, 1 to 8 October 2026, concluded in failure, per the 8 October check. GitHub's API wasn't readable on 1 November, so the current state is unchecked (10 of 25). 840 open issues and pull requests and most of the newest without a reply, per the 8 October check. The three reports it named (#2032, #2056, #2031) were fixed in 0.39.1, 0.39.2 and 0.39.4, but the current issue list couldn't be read (10 of 25). Every release has a changelog entry and breaking changes get their own heading, on a 0.x line (10 of 15). 0.41.1 with a Labs badge and no stable declaration (0). 18 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 48.
AutoCua 25
Local package. Installs from PyPI as AutoCua with Python 3.10 or later and the supported platforms stated (20). No CI runs the tests; the only workflow, use_case_label.yml, labels issues (0). GitHub issues weren't read, so the open-issue line is scored absent (0). Four tags in a week with no changelog file (5). Version 0.1.9 (0). 20 + 0 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 25.
Transparency & trust agent-browser +21
agent-browser 63
Apache-2.0, copyright Vercel Inc. (30). No privacy statement for the software. The docs say where credentials, keys and state are stored, that saved state expires after 30 days by default, and that chat goes to the Vercel AI Gateway (18 of 30). No deprecation policy. The changelog flagged the -C snapshot flag as deprecated under a Breaking Changes heading (6 of 20). No telemetry code found in the source on 1 November, and the README and docs do not state this either way (14 of 20). 30 + 18 + 6 + 14 = 68.
AutoCua 42
MIT (30). Says it sends data only to the chosen model provider and keeps everything else locally, and the source agrees (20 of 30). No deprecation policy (0). States no telemetry, and none was found (20). 30 + 20 + 0 + 20 = 70.
Maintenance & community agent-browser +5
agent-browser 70
0.41.1 on 30 October 2026 (30). 18 tagged releases in the 90 days from 3 August, 0.34.0 on 10 August to 0.41.1, read from a clone (20). 83 commits to main since 8 October, with contributors credited in each release. Of the 19 newest open issues on 8 October, 12 had no comment and none had a label; the current list couldn't be read (10 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry on 1 November, where a search for agent-browser returns only other publishers. Homebrew is current and crates.io is 22 minor versions behind (5 of 15). No runtime npm dependencies and a lockfile, with CI failing on main per the 8 October check (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 5 + 5 = 70.
AutoCua 65
v0.1.9 tagged on 4 November 2026 (30). Four tags in 90 days (20). Issues and pull requests weren't read (0 of 25). The PyPI wheel is current (15). No CI; dependencies pinned per OS in requirements files (0 of 10). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 65.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | agent-browser | AutoCua | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 48 | 25 | agent-browser +23 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 42 | agent-browser +42 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 55 | agent-browser +25 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 38 | agent-browser +29 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 65 | agent-browser +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 42 | agent-browser +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.1/100 | E 44.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | agent-browser | AutoCua |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Vercel Labs | Ashish Yadav and contributors (ComputerUseAgent on GitHub) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 156 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Popularity | 44k stars, 2.1M npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
AutoCua
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
agent-browser
Snapshots with element refs, a 29-tool default MCP profile and opt-in domain allowlists, action policies and content boundary markers suit agent use. The project is at 0.41.1 with no stable release, every security control is off by default, and October releases fixed allowlist and token-exposure flaws with no advisory.
AutoCua
A capable, fast-moving open-source agent for driving desktops, browsers and phones through real input and accessibility trees, with a careful safety section. It's two weeks old, with no test CI or changelog, and on Windows the model itself decides whether to accept an admin elevation prompt.
Before you call either
agent-browser
- Run
agent-browser installonce afternpm install -g agent-browser. It downloads Chrome for Testing - Upgrade to 0.41.0 or later before relying on
--allowed-domainsfrom MCP. Earlier tool arguments could override it - Take a fresh
snapshot -iafter any navigation. Refs survive same-document changes only - On
outcome_unknown, check the page state before repeating a mutating command - Set
--allowed-domains,--action-policyand--content-boundariesfor untrusted sites. None is on by default
AutoCua
- pip install AutoCua, then call run_agent with a mode such as "web use" or "computer use", a provider, a model and a task
- Run it on a machine or account you can afford to lose; it drives real input and keeps logged-in browser profiles
- On Windows, don't install the Interception driver unless you accept the model deciding UAC prompts
- Set AutoCua_DATA_DIR to keep keys and profiles somewhere private
- Phones go over USB from a script; Wi-Fi only through the desktop app
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, agent-browser or AutoCua?
agent-browser scores 64.1 (B) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Can an agent call agent-browser and AutoCua without installing anything?
agent-browser runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for AutoCua.
Are agent-browser and AutoCua open source?
Yes. agent-browser is open source (Apache-2.0). AutoCua is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with agent-browser or AutoCua
- agent-browser vs Airtop
- agent-browser vs Anchor Browser
- agent-browser vs Browser Use
- agent-browser vs Browserbase
- agent-browser vs Browserless
- agent-browser vs BxPlaywright
- agent-browser vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- agent-browser vs Functionize MCP server
- agent-browser vs Hyperbrowser
- agent-browser vs Kane CLI
- agent-browser vs Lightpanda
- agent-browser vs Notte
- agent-browser vs Playwright MCP
- agent-browser vs Pomerado
- agent-browser vs Puppeteer
- agent-browser vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- agent-browser vs Selenium
- agent-browser vs Skyvern
- agent-browser vs Steel
- agent-browser vs TinyFish
- Airtop vs AutoCua
- Anchor Browser vs AutoCua
- AutoCua vs Browser Use
- AutoCua vs Browserless
- AutoCua vs BxPlaywright
- AutoCua vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- AutoCua vs Functionize MCP server
- AutoCua vs Hyperbrowser
- AutoCua vs Kane CLI
- AutoCua vs Lightpanda
- AutoCua vs Notte
- AutoCua vs Playwright MCP
- AutoCua vs Pomerado
- AutoCua vs Puppeteer
- AutoCua vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- AutoCua vs Robocorp
- AutoCua vs Selenium
- AutoCua vs Skyvern
- AutoCua vs Steel
- AutoCua vs TinyFish
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/agent-browser-vs-autocua.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/agent-browser.json·/api/v1/tools/autocua.json - From a terminal
anchor compare agent-browser autocua(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "agent-browser", "b": "autocua"}at/mcp, no key