Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
agent-browser vs Steel
Steel scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against agent-browser's 66.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. agent-browser leads on security & auth. Both do browser automation. Steel accepts x402. agent-browser doesn't.
Which one, for what
Good for Coding agents with a shell that want short commands and compact snapshots.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 67 against 56
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
The ten most recent CI runs on main, 1 to 8 October 2026, all concluded in failure. In the newest, Windows Rust tests and native end-to-end tests failed
Steel BB
Good for Agents that need a real cloud browser with persistent profiles, stored logins, CAPTCHA solving and a human takeover path, and teams that want an open-source runtime they can also self-host.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 58 against 48
- Payments & pricing, 75 against 60
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 70
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Three incidents of more than an hour hit the API or session creation in the 90 days to 8 October 2026, the longest 5 hours 41 minutes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | agent-browser | Steel | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 48 | 58 | Steel +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 86 | Steel +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 79 | Steel +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 56 | agent-browser +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 75 | Steel +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 82 | Steel +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 64 | Steel +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.6 · B | 70.4 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | agent-browser | Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Vercel Labs | Nen Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.steel.dev |
| Transports | stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | yes, from $0.01/call |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 158 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2025-02-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-02-05 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 44k stars, 2.1M npm/wk | 47k npm/wk, 63k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
agent-browser
Snapshots with element refs, a 29-tool default MCP profile and opt-in domain allowlists, action policies and content boundary markers suit agent use. The project is at 0.38.2 with no stable release, the ten most recent CI runs on main failed between 1 and 8 October 2026, and every security control is off by default.
Steel
The hosted API has a public OpenAPI document, per-unit prices, $30 of starting credit and x402 payment for scrape, screenshot and PDF calls. The status page records three API or session-creation incidents of more than an hour in 90 days, and the documented CDP connection puts the API key in the URL.
Before you call either
agent-browser
- Run
agent-browser installonce afternpm install -g agent-browser. It downloads Chrome for Testing - Take a fresh
snapshot -iafter any navigation. Refs survive same-document changes only - Pass
--jsonfor machine-readable results and--max-outputto cap page text - Set
--allowed-domains,--action-policyand--content-boundariesfor untrusted sites. None is on by default, and the allowlist rejects--profile,--cdpand--restore - Start MCP with
agent-browser mcp, and add profiles such as--tools core,networkonly when needed
Steel
- Use
POST /v1/scrapefor pages you only need to read. It starts no session and costs $5 per 1,000 calls, or $0.01 a call by x402 - Release every session with
POST /v1/sessions/{id}/releaseand setinactivityTimeout. Browser time bills by the minute, rounded up - Build the CDP URL as
wss://connect.steel.dev?apiKey=<key>&sessionId=<id>and keep it out of logs, because it carries the key - Launch sessions end after 15 minutes at most, and
timeoutcannot be changed on a live session - CAPTCHA solving and Steel's managed proxies on Launch need $10 of paid balance. Free credit does not count
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, agent-browser or Steel?
Steel scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against agent-browser's 66.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. agent-browser leads on security & auth.
Do agent-browser and Steel need an API key?
agent-browser needs no key. Steel needs an API key. An agent can also pay Steel per call over x402, with no account.
Can an agent call agent-browser and Steel without installing anything?
agent-browser runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Steel has a hosted endpoint at https://api.steel.dev.
Are agent-browser and Steel open source?
Yes. agent-browser is open source (Apache-2.0). Steel is open source (Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT).
Other comparisons with agent-browser or Steel
- agent-browser vs Airtop
- agent-browser vs Anchor Browser
- agent-browser vs Browser Use
- agent-browser vs Browserbase
- agent-browser vs Browserless
- agent-browser vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- agent-browser vs Hyperbrowser
- agent-browser vs Notte
- agent-browser vs Playwright MCP
- agent-browser vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- agent-browser vs Skyvern
- agent-browser vs TinyFish
- Airtop vs Steel
- Anchor Browser vs Steel
- Browser Use vs Steel
- Browserless vs Steel
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Steel
- Hyperbrowser vs Steel
- Notte vs Steel
- Playwright MCP vs Steel
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Steel
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Steel vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Steel
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/agent-browser-vs-steel.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/agent-browser.json·/api/v1/tools/steel.json - From a terminal
anchor compare agent-browser steel(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "agent-browser", "b": "steel"}at/mcp, no key