Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Pomerado vs Steel
Steel scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Pomerado's 62.6 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Pomerado leads on security & auth. Both do browser automation. Steel accepts x402. Pomerado doesn't.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 136 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
Pomerado B
Best for An agent that repeats the same task on consumer sites or portals, such as flight searches, carts or order history, and wants a typed call instead of driving a browser.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 69 against 56
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
First released on 5 October 2026, with a team of two per its YC profile
Steel BB
Best for Agents that need a real cloud browser with persistent profiles, stored logins, CAPTCHA solving and a human takeover path, and teams that want an open-source runtime they can also self-host.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 58 against 40
- Payments & pricing, 75 against 42
- Transparency & trust, 64 against 54
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Three incidents of more than an hour hit the API or session creation in the 90 days to 8 October 2026, the longest 5 hours 41 minutes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pomerado | Steel | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 58 | Steel +18 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 86 | 86 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 83 | 79 | Pomerado +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 69 | 56 | Pomerado +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 42 | 75 | Steel +33 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 81 | 82 | Steel +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 54 | 64 | Steel +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.6/100 | BB 70.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pomerado | Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Pomerado AI, Inc. | Nen Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp | https://api.steel.dev |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | yes, from $0.01/call |
| Licence | Pomerado Cloud is a proprietary service under Pomerado's terms of service. The minting core in Pomerado/pomerado and the pomerado npm package are MIT from version 0.2.0, and versions 0.1.2 and earlier were AGPL-3.0-only | Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 14 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | ai.pomerado/pomerado | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-02-05 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-02-05 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 37k npm/wk | 47k npm/wk, 63k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Pomerado
An agent can find and run 46 public read-only website tools with no account, and signed-in calls get scoped, expiring keys, idempotency keys and a documented code for every failure. Pomerado is 12 days old, with no status page or security.txt, and its homepage lists bank and government portals that its builds refuse.
Steel
The hosted API has a public OpenAPI document, per-unit prices, $30 of starting credit and x402 payment for scrape, screenshot and PDF calls. The status page records three API or session-creation incidents of more than an hour in 90 days, and the documented CDP connection puts the API key in the URL.
Before you call either
Pomerado
- Try public read-only tools at https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp/keyless, then use
sign_inand reconnect at /mcp with the key for writes, logins and builds - Call
find_website_toolwith a query andsite_url, and checkpossible_matchesbefore starting a build - Send an
idempotency_keywith every run that writes, and onoutcome_unknownread the website back before calling again - Give the person the job's
answer_urlfor website logins and codes. Don't take passwords in chat - Save a run's result when it arrives. It is returned once and erased after 60 minutes if unread
Steel
- Use
POST /v1/scrapefor pages you only need to read. It starts no session and costs $5 per 1,000 calls, or $0.01 a call by x402 - Release every session with
POST /v1/sessions/{id}/releaseand setinactivityTimeout. Browser time bills by the minute, rounded up - Build the CDP URL as
wss://connect.steel.dev?apiKey=<key>&sessionId=<id>and keep it out of logs, because it carries the key - Launch sessions end after 15 minutes at most, and
timeoutcannot be changed on a live session - CAPTCHA solving and Steel's managed proxies on Launch need $10 of paid balance. Free credit does not count
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Pomerado or Steel?
Steel scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Pomerado's 62.6 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Pomerado leads on security & auth.
Do Pomerado and Steel need an API key?
Pomerado takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Steel needs an API key. An agent can also pay Steel per call over x402, with no account.
Can an agent call Pomerado and Steel without installing anything?
Yes. Pomerado has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp and Steel at https://api.steel.dev.
Are Pomerado and Steel open source?
Yes. Pomerado is open source (Pomerado Cloud is a proprietary service under Pomerado's terms of service. The minting core in Pomerado/pomerado and the `pomerado` npm package are MIT from version 0.2.0, and versions 0.1.2 and earlier were AGPL-3.0-only). Steel is open source (Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT).
Other comparisons with Pomerado or Steel
- agent-browser vs Pomerado
- agent-browser vs Steel
- Airtop vs Pomerado
- Airtop vs Steel
- Anchor Browser vs Pomerado
- Anchor Browser vs Steel
- Browser Use vs Pomerado
- Browser Use vs Steel
- Browserbase vs Pomerado
- Browserless vs Pomerado
- Browserless vs Steel
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Pomerado
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Steel
- Hyperbrowser vs Pomerado
- Hyperbrowser vs Steel
- Notte vs Pomerado
- Notte vs Steel
- Playwright MCP vs Pomerado
- Playwright MCP vs Steel
- Pomerado vs Puppeteer
- Pomerado vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Pomerado vs Selenium
- Pomerado vs Skyvern
- Pomerado vs TinyFish
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Steel
- Puppeteer vs Steel
- Selenium vs Steel
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Steel vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Steel
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/pomerado-vs-steel.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/pomerado.json·/api/v1/tools/steel.json - From a terminal
anchor compare pomerado steel(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "pomerado", "b": "steel"}at/mcp, no key