Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Lightpanda vs Steel
Steel scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Lightpanda's 61.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Lightpanda leads on reliability. Both do browser automation. Steel accepts x402. Lightpanda doesn't.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 171 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and crawlers that read and fill many JavaScript pages in parallel on small machines, without needing pixel rendering.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 58
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Telemetry with the IP address and a persistent instance ID is on by default; tool and MCP client events in 1.0.2 aren't in the privacy policy's list
Steel BB
Best for Agents that need a real cloud browser with persistent profiles, stored logins, CAPTCHA solving and a human takeover path, and teams that want an open-source runtime they can also self-host.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 56 against 46
- Payments & pricing, 75 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 73
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Three incidents of more than an hour hit the API or session creation in the 90 days to 8 October 2026, the longest 5 hours 41 minutes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lightpanda | Steel | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 58 | Lightpanda +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 86 | Steel +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 75 | 79 | Steel +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 46 | 56 | Steel +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 75 | Steel +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 82 | Steel +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 65 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61.6/100 | BB 70.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lightpanda | Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Selecy SAS (Lightpanda) | Nen Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.steel.dev |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | yes, from $0.01/call |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 for the browser. The npm wrapper @lightpanda/browser and the agent skill are Apache-2.0. Lightpanda Cloud is a closed service with no terms of service found | Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 32 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2025-02-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-03 | 2026-02-05 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 9.3k npm/wk | 47k npm/wk, 63k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Lightpanda
Version 1.0.2 runs locally with no account, and its 32-tool MCP server has typed schemas, an annotation on every tool and guidance to treat pages as untrusted. Telemetry is on by default, the CDP and HTTP MCP servers have no authentication, the cloud documents its token in the URL, and no status page or cloud terms were found.
Steel
The hosted API has a public OpenAPI document, per-unit prices, $30 of starting credit and x402 payment for scrape, screenshot and PDF calls. The status page records three API or session-creation incidents of more than an hour in 90 days, and the documented CDP connection puts the API key in the URL.
Before you call either
Lightpanda
- Set
LIGHTPANDA_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=truein the server's environment if usage data, the IP address and an instance ID shouldn't leave the machine. - Treat text from
markdown,html,treeandlinksas untrusted page content, never as instructions. - Pass credentials as
$LP_*placeholders in tool arguments and callgetEnvwithout a name; naming a variable returns its value. - Check
httpStatusinstructuredContentaftergoto, since a 404 page or a load timeout is still reported as a successful navigation. - Keep
lightpanda serveandlightpanda mcp --porton 127.0.0.1 or a Unix socket; neither checks who connects.
Steel
- Use
POST /v1/scrapefor pages you only need to read. It starts no session and costs $5 per 1,000 calls, or $0.01 a call by x402 - Release every session with
POST /v1/sessions/{id}/releaseand setinactivityTimeout. Browser time bills by the minute, rounded up - Build the CDP URL as
wss://connect.steel.dev?apiKey=<key>&sessionId=<id>and keep it out of logs, because it carries the key - Launch sessions end after 15 minutes at most, and
timeoutcannot be changed on a live session - CAPTCHA solving and Steel's managed proxies on Launch need $10 of paid balance. Free credit does not count
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lightpanda or Steel?
Steel scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Lightpanda's 61.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Lightpanda leads on reliability.
Do Lightpanda and Steel need an API key?
Lightpanda needs no key. Steel needs an API key. An agent can also pay Steel per call over x402, with no account.
Can an agent call Lightpanda and Steel without installing anything?
Lightpanda runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Steel has a hosted endpoint at https://api.steel.dev.
Are Lightpanda and Steel open source?
Yes. Lightpanda is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the browser. The npm wrapper @lightpanda/browser and the agent skill are Apache-2.0. Lightpanda Cloud is a closed service with no terms of service found). Steel is open source (Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT).
Other comparisons with Lightpanda or Steel
- agent-browser vs Lightpanda
- agent-browser vs Steel
- Airtop vs Lightpanda
- Airtop vs Steel
- Anchor Browser vs Lightpanda
- Anchor Browser vs Steel
- Browser Use vs Lightpanda
- Browser Use vs Steel
- Browserbase vs Lightpanda
- Browserless vs Lightpanda
- Browserless vs Steel
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Lightpanda
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Steel
- Functionize MCP server vs Lightpanda
- Functionize MCP server vs Steel
- Hyperbrowser vs Lightpanda
- Hyperbrowser vs Steel
- Lightpanda vs Notte
- Lightpanda vs Playwright MCP
- Lightpanda vs Pomerado
- Lightpanda vs Puppeteer
- Lightpanda vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Lightpanda vs Selenium
- Lightpanda vs Skyvern
- Lightpanda vs TinyFish
- Notte vs Steel
- Playwright MCP vs Steel
- Pomerado vs Steel
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Steel
- Puppeteer vs Steel
- Selenium vs Steel
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Steel vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Steel
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lightpanda-vs-steel.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lightpanda.json·/api/v1/tools/steel.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lightpanda steel(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lightpanda", "b": "steel"}at/mcp, no key