Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Skyvern vs Steel
Steel scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on transparency & trust. Both do browser automation. Steel accepts x402. Skyvern doesn't.
Which one, for what
Skyvern B
Good for Agents that must finish a multi-step job on sites with logins, 2FA and forms, where stored credentials, saved workflows and cached scripts matter more than raw browser time.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 64
Watch for
Every API key and OAuth token has full organisation authority. The docs state there are no read-only, per-endpoint or per-resource keys
Steel BB
Good for Agents that need a real cloud browser with persistent profiles, stored logins, CAPTCHA solving and a human takeover path, and teams that want an open-source runtime they can also self-host.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 75 against 32
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- No incidents deducted, where Skyvern loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Three incidents of more than an hour hit the API or session creation in the 90 days to 8 October 2026, the longest 5 hours 41 minutes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Skyvern | Steel | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 57 | 58 | Steel +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 86 | Skyvern +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 79 | Steel +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 59 | 56 | Skyvern +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 32 | 75 | Steel +43 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 82 | Skyvern +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 72 | 64 | Skyvern +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.1 · B | 70.4 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Skyvern | Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Ikonomos Inc. (Skyvern) | Nen Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.skyvern.com/v1 | https://api.steel.dev |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | yes, from $0.01/call |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository | Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 114 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.Skyvern-AI/skyvern | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-02-27 | 2025-02-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2026-02-05 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 23k stars, 3.2k npm/wk, 1.6k PyPI/wk | 47k npm/wk, 63k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Skyvern
The hosted MCP server annotates every tool as read-only or destructive and can advertise a 29 or 32-tool subset in place of 114, and the API has a written six-month deprecation policy. Every key and OAuth token carries full organisation authority, with no read-only or scoped credential, and no request rate limits are documented.
Steel
The hosted API has a public OpenAPI document, per-unit prices, $30 of starting credit and x402 payment for scrape, screenshot and PDF calls. The status page records three API or session-creation incidents of more than an hour in 90 days, and the documented CDP connection puts the API key in the URL.
Before you call either
Skyvern
- Connect to https://api.skyvern.com/mcp/x/lean or /x/operate, or send
X-Skyvern-Scope, so the client loads 32 or 29 tools. The scope filters the list and does not limit permissions - Use a separate Skyvern organisation for each blast radius. Any key or OAuth token can read and write stored credentials and delete workflows
- Never pass passwords to
skyvern_actorskyvern_type. Store them as credentials and callskyvern_login - Set
max_stepson tasks, orx-max-steps-overrideon agent runs, to cap credits. A run that reaches the cap ends astimed_out - On 503 from POST /v1/run/agents, wait
Retry-Afterseconds. No run was created, so resubmitting is safe
Steel
- Use
POST /v1/scrapefor pages you only need to read. It starts no session and costs $5 per 1,000 calls, or $0.01 a call by x402 - Release every session with
POST /v1/sessions/{id}/releaseand setinactivityTimeout. Browser time bills by the minute, rounded up - Build the CDP URL as
wss://connect.steel.dev?apiKey=<key>&sessionId=<id>and keep it out of logs, because it carries the key - Launch sessions end after 15 minutes at most, and
timeoutcannot be changed on a live session - CAPTCHA solving and Steel's managed proxies on Launch need $10 of paid balance. Free credit does not count
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Skyvern or Steel?
Steel scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on transparency & trust.
Do Skyvern and Steel need an API key?
Skyvern takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Steel needs an API key. An agent can also pay Steel per call over x402, with no account.
Can an agent call Skyvern and Steel without installing anything?
Yes. Skyvern has a hosted endpoint at https://api.skyvern.com/v1 and Steel at https://api.steel.dev.
Are Skyvern and Steel open source?
Yes. Skyvern is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository). Steel is open source (Proprietary cloud service under Steel's terms. steel-browser and the Node and Python SDKs are Apache-2.0. The MCP server and the CLI are MIT).
Other comparisons with Skyvern or Steel
- Browser Use vs Skyvern
- Browser Use vs Steel
- Browserless vs Skyvern
- Browserless vs Steel
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Skyvern
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Steel
- Hyperbrowser vs Skyvern
- Hyperbrowser vs Steel
- Playwright MCP vs Skyvern
- Playwright MCP vs Steel
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Steel
- Browserbase vs Skyvern
- Browserbase vs Steel
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/skyvern-vs-steel.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/skyvern.json·/api/v1/tools/steel.json - From a terminal
anchor compare skyvern steel(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "skyvern", "b": "steel"}at/mcp, no key