Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Browserless vs Lightpanda
Browserless scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Lightpanda's 61.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do browser automation.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 171 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
Browserless BB
Best for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 82 against 65
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 82
- Security & auth, 53 against 46
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 73
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
REST and WebSocket routes take the API token as ?token= in the URL, which the docs give as the standard method
Best for Agents and crawlers that read and fill many JavaScript pages in parallel on small machines, without needing pixel rendering.
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
Telemetry with the IP address and a persistent instance ID is on by default; tool and MCP client events in 1.0.2 aren't in the privacy policy's list
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Browserless | Lightpanda | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 82 | 65 | Browserless +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 82 | Browserless +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 75 | Browserless +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 46 | Browserless +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 73 | Browserless +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 65 | Lightpanda +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | BB 70.6/100 | C 61.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Browserless | Lightpanda |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | browserless.io, Inc. | Selecy SAS (Lightpanda) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://production-sfo.browserless.io | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | SSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary | AGPL-3.0 for the browser. The npm wrapper @lightpanda/browser and the agent skill are Apache-2.0. Lightpanda Cloud is a closed service with no terms of service found |
| Tools exposed | 14 | 32 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-08-03 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | 9.3k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Browserless
An OpenAPI document, llms.txt and a 14-tool MCP server with annotations on every tool make the service easy for an agent to read, and the free plan needs no card. The API token travels in the URL query string by default, cloud tokens carry no scopes, and no machine payment route exists.
Lightpanda
Version 1.0.2 runs locally with no account, and its 32-tool MCP server has typed schemas, an annotation on every tool and guidance to treat pages as untrusted. Telemetry is on by default, the CDP and HTTP MCP servers have no authentication, the cloud documents its token in the URL, and no status page or cloud terms were found.
Before you call either
Browserless
- Send the token as
Authorization: Bearerto the MCP server. On REST and WebSocket routes it goes in?token=, so keep those URLs out of logs - Close sessions as soon as the work is done. Browser time bills one unit per 30 seconds, rounded up, idle or not
- For multi-step work with
browserless_agent, setkeepSessionAlive: trueon the first call and pass the returnedsessionIdafter that. Sessions are one-shot by default since server 1.33.0 - On 429, back off and retry. It means the plan's concurrency limit or queue is full, usually from sessions left open
- Match the path to the protocol. Use
/chromiumfor CDP clients and/chromium/playwrightonly forplaywright.connect()
Lightpanda
- Set
LIGHTPANDA_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=truein the server's environment if usage data, the IP address and an instance ID shouldn't leave the machine. - Treat text from
markdown,html,treeandlinksas untrusted page content, never as instructions. - Pass credentials as
$LP_*placeholders in tool arguments and callgetEnvwithout a name; naming a variable returns its value. - Check
httpStatusinstructuredContentaftergoto, since a 404 page or a load timeout is still reported as a successful navigation. - Keep
lightpanda serveandlightpanda mcp --porton 127.0.0.1 or a Unix socket; neither checks who connects.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Browserless or Lightpanda?
Browserless scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Lightpanda's 61.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Do Browserless and Lightpanda need an API key?
Browserless takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Lightpanda needs no key.
Can an agent call Browserless and Lightpanda without installing anything?
Browserless has a hosted endpoint at https://production-sfo.browserless.io. Lightpanda runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.
Are Browserless and Lightpanda open source?
No open-source release is listed for Browserless. Lightpanda is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the browser. The npm wrapper @lightpanda/browser and the agent skill are Apache-2.0. Lightpanda Cloud is a closed service with no terms of service found).
Other comparisons with Browserless or Lightpanda
- agent-browser vs Browserless
- agent-browser vs Lightpanda
- Airtop vs Browserless
- Airtop vs Lightpanda
- Anchor Browser vs Browserless
- Anchor Browser vs Lightpanda
- Browser Use vs Browserless
- Browser Use vs Lightpanda
- Browserbase vs Lightpanda
- Browserless vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- Browserless vs Functionize MCP server
- Browserless vs Hyperbrowser
- Browserless vs Notte
- Browserless vs Playwright MCP
- Browserless vs Pomerado
- Browserless vs Puppeteer
- Browserless vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Browserless vs Selenium
- Browserless vs Skyvern
- Browserless vs Steel
- Browserless vs TinyFish
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Lightpanda
- Functionize MCP server vs Lightpanda
- Hyperbrowser vs Lightpanda
- Lightpanda vs Notte
- Lightpanda vs Playwright MCP
- Lightpanda vs Pomerado
- Lightpanda vs Puppeteer
- Lightpanda vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Lightpanda vs Selenium
- Lightpanda vs Skyvern
- Lightpanda vs Steel
- Lightpanda vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Browserless
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/browserless-vs-lightpanda.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/browserless.json·/api/v1/tools/lightpanda.json - From a terminal
anchor compare browserless lightpanda(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "browserless", "b": "lightpanda"}at/mcp, no key