Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Browserless vs TinyFish
Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against TinyFish's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. TinyFish leads on payments & pricing. Both do browser automation.
Which one, for what
Browserless BB
Good for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 82 against 60
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
REST and WebSocket routes take the API token as ?token= in the URL, which the docs give as the standard method
TinyFish B
Good for Agents that want one account for a goal-driven web agent, a raw CDP browser, and free search and fetch.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 40
Watch for
The terms of 17 August 2026 allow Tiny Fish to train and improve its models on customer data. No opt-out was found in the reviewed pages
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Browserless | TinyFish | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 82 | 60 | Browserless +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 85 | Browserless +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 79 | TinyFish +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 57 | TinyFish +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 55 | TinyFish +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 80 | Browserless +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 59 | Browserless +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 70.4 · BB | 67.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Browserless | TinyFish |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | browserless.io, Inc. | Tiny Fish, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://production-sfo.browserless.io | https://agent.tinyfish.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | SSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary | Proprietary service under Tiny Fish's terms of service. The MCP proxy @tiny-fish/mcp and the cookbook are MIT. The SDK packages state no licence in npm or PyPI metadata |
| Tools exposed | 14 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-08-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-12-14 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Browserless
An OpenAPI document, llms.txt and a 14-tool MCP server with annotations on every tool make the service easy for an agent to read, and the free plan needs no card. The API token travels in the URL query string by default, cloud tokens carry no scopes, and no machine payment route exists.
TinyFish
OpenAPI documents are published for five APIs, errors carry typed codes and request IDs, and Search and Fetch are free within daily allowances. The terms let Tiny Fish train its models on customer data, run creation takes no idempotency keys, and the status page shows an hour or more of downtime on several days for the Browser and Search APIs.
Before you call either
Browserless
- Send the token as
Authorization: Bearerto the MCP server. On REST and WebSocket routes it goes in?token=, so keep those URLs out of logs - Close sessions as soon as the work is done. Browser time bills one unit per 30 seconds, rounded up, idle or not
- For multi-step work with
browserless_agent, setkeepSessionAlive: trueon the first call and pass the returnedsessionIdafter that. Sessions are one-shot by default since server 1.33.0 - On 429, back off and retry. It means the plan's concurrency limit or queue is full, usually from sessions left open
- Match the path to the protocol. Use
/chromiumfor CDP clients and/chromium/playwrightonly forplaywright.connect()
TinyFish
- Check
resultas well asstatus. A run can beCOMPLETEDwhile the goal failed, withresult.statusset tofailure - Don't retry
POST /v1/automation/runblindly after a timeout. There are no idempotency keys, so list runs first to avoid duplicates - Use
/v1/automation/run-asyncor/run-ssewhen a run may need cancelling. Runs started with the synchronous endpoint can't be cancelled - Allow 60 seconds for Browser session creation, connect Playwright to
cdp_url(notbase_url), andDELETEthe session when done because billing is per minute - Never put passwords in
goal, which is logged. Passuse_vault: truewithcredential_item_ids, oruse_profile: truefor saved login state
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Browserless or TinyFish?
Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against TinyFish's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. TinyFish leads on payments & pricing.
Do Browserless and TinyFish need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Browserless and TinyFish without installing anything?
Yes. Browserless has a hosted endpoint at https://production-sfo.browserless.io and TinyFish at https://agent.tinyfish.ai.
Other comparisons with Browserless or TinyFish
- agent-browser vs Browserless
- agent-browser vs TinyFish
- Airtop vs Browserless
- Airtop vs TinyFish
- Anchor Browser vs Browserless
- Anchor Browser vs TinyFish
- Browser Use vs Browserless
- Browser Use vs TinyFish
- Browserless vs Chrome DevTools MCP
- Browserless vs Hyperbrowser
- Browserless vs Notte
- Browserless vs Playwright MCP
- Browserless vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Browserless vs Skyvern
- Browserless vs Steel
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs TinyFish
- Hyperbrowser vs TinyFish
- Notte vs TinyFish
- Playwright MCP vs TinyFish
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs TinyFish
- Skyvern vs TinyFish
- Steel vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Browserless
- Browserbase vs TinyFish
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/browserless-vs-tinyfish.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/browserless.json·/api/v1/tools/tinyfish.json - From a terminal
anchor compare browserless tinyfish(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "browserless", "b": "tinyfish"}at/mcp, no key