Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Functionize MCP server vs TinyFish
TinyFish scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against Functionize MCP server's 44.7 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do browser automation.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 153 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams that use Functionize Studio and want a coding agent to request, run and diagnose end-to-end browser tests of web apps without driving a browser itself.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Tool definitions, input schemas and annotations aren't published, and tools/list needs a signed-in account
TinyFish B
Best for Agents that want one account for a goal-driven web agent, a raw CDP browser, and free search and fetch.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 50
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 29
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 49
Watch for
The terms of 17 August 2026 allow Tiny Fish to train and improve its models on customer data. No opt-out was found in the reviewed pages
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Functionize MCP server | TinyFish | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 60 | TinyFish +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 29 | 85 | TinyFish +56 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 43 | 79 | TinyFish +36 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 57 | TinyFish +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 55 | TinyFish +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 49 | 80 | TinyFish +31 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 59 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 44.7/100 | B 67.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Functionize MCP server | TinyFish |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Functionize, Inc. | TinyFish |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.functionize.com/mcp | https://agent.tinyfish.ai |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Functionize's Terms of Service (version 2.0, effective 10 July 2026). The Claude Code plugin and its two skills are MIT-licensed; the server's source isn't public | Proprietary service under Tiny Fish's terms of service. The MCP proxy @tiny-fish/mcp and the cookbook are MIT. The SDK packages state no licence in npm or PyPI metadata |
| Tools exposed | 10 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-17 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-14 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | none | 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Functionize MCP server
The server passes a coding agent's test requests to Functionize Studio's testing agent, which tests a live web app in cloud browsers and reports the failing step. It uses OAuth with read and write scopes and has a no-card free plan. Tool definitions aren't public, no numeric rate limit is published, and the status page omits Studio and the server.
TinyFish
OpenAPI documents are published for five APIs, errors carry typed codes and request IDs, and Search and Fetch are free within daily allowances. The terms let Tiny Fish train its models on customer data, run creation takes no idempotency keys, and the status page shows an hour or more of downtime on several days for the Browser and Search APIs.
Before you call either
Functionize MCP server
- Have the person complete the browser sign-in, which an agent can't do, then check the connection with
list_agent_teams - Pass the project ID, environment and test ID in
start_agent_session, and continue a waiting session withsend_agent_messagerather than starting another - Report a created test as done only after a green run, not on a test ID or a green generation
- After a dropped connection, list the project's recent tests before creating a test again, since a submitted create finishes on the server
- Send the
X-Functionize-Team-Idheader to pin a team, and keep credentials in masked Studio variables, never in prompts
TinyFish
- Check
resultas well asstatus. A run can beCOMPLETEDwhile the goal failed, withresult.statusset tofailure - Don't retry
POST /v1/automation/runblindly after a timeout. There are no idempotency keys, so list runs first to avoid duplicates - Use
/v1/automation/run-asyncor/run-ssewhen a run may need cancelling. Runs started with the synchronous endpoint can't be cancelled - Allow 60 seconds for Browser session creation, connect Playwright to
cdp_url(notbase_url), andDELETEthe session when done because billing is per minute - Never put passwords in
goal, which is logged. Passuse_vault: truewithcredential_item_ids, oruse_profile: truefor saved login state
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Functionize MCP server or TinyFish?
TinyFish scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against Functionize MCP server's 44.7 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Functionize MCP server and TinyFish need an API key?
Functionize MCP server uses an OAuth sign-in. TinyFish takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Functionize MCP server and TinyFish without installing anything?
Yes. Functionize MCP server has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.functionize.com/mcp and TinyFish at https://agent.tinyfish.ai.
Other comparisons with Functionize MCP server or TinyFish
- agent-browser vs Functionize MCP server
- agent-browser vs TinyFish
- Airtop vs Functionize MCP server
- Airtop vs TinyFish
- Anchor Browser vs Functionize MCP server
- Anchor Browser vs TinyFish
- Browser Use vs Functionize MCP server
- Browser Use vs TinyFish
- Browserless vs Functionize MCP server
- Browserless vs TinyFish
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Functionize MCP server
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs TinyFish
- Functionize MCP server vs Hyperbrowser
- Functionize MCP server vs Notte
- Functionize MCP server vs Playwright MCP
- Functionize MCP server vs Pomerado
- Functionize MCP server vs Puppeteer
- Functionize MCP server vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Functionize MCP server vs Selenium
- Functionize MCP server vs Skyvern
- Functionize MCP server vs Steel
- Hyperbrowser vs TinyFish
- Notte vs TinyFish
- Playwright MCP vs TinyFish
- Pomerado vs TinyFish
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs TinyFish
- Puppeteer vs TinyFish
- Selenium vs TinyFish
- Skyvern vs TinyFish
- Steel vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Functionize MCP server
- Browserbase vs TinyFish
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/functionize-mcp-vs-tinyfish.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/functionize-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/tinyfish.json - From a terminal
anchor compare functionize-mcp tinyfish(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "functionize-mcp", "b": "tinyfish"}at/mcp, no key