# Browserless vs TinyFish (slim)

> Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against TinyFish's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. TinyFish leads on payments & pricing. Both do browser automation. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browserless-vs-tinyfish.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browserless-vs-tinyfish.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browserless-vs-tinyfish
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against TinyFish's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. TinyFish leads on payments & pricing. Both do browser automation.

- Browserless: BB 70.4, rank #148 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/browserless.min.md
- TinyFish: B 67.7, rank #227 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tinyfish.min.md
- Browserless, good for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves. Ahead on Reliability, 82 against 60. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine.
- TinyFish, good for Agents that want one account for a goal-driven web agent, a raw CDP browser, and free search and fetch. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 55 against 40.

| Category | Browserless | TinyFish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 82 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 89 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 78 | 79 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 53 | 57 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 55 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 62 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Browserless | TinyFish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | browserless.io, Inc. | Tiny Fish, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://production-sfo.browserless.io` | `https://agent.tinyfish.ai` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Licence | SSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary | Proprietary service under Tiny Fish's terms of service. The MCP proxy `@tiny-fish/mcp` and the cookbook are MIT. The SDK packages state no licence in npm or PyPI metadata |
| Tools exposed | 14 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent` |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-08-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-12-14 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |