Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run

Browser Use vs Browserless

Browser Use scores 77.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Browserless's 70.4 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Browserless leads on maintenance & community. Both do browser automation. Browser Use accepts x402. Browserless doesn't.

Which one, for what

Browser Use BB

Good for An agent that wants to hand a whole browser task to a hosted agent and get a result back, or that needs a low-cost cloud browser over CDP, and for unattended agents that can pay by x402.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 87 against 82
  • Security & auth, 59 against 53
  • Payments & pricing, 90 against 40

Also in its favour

  • An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
  • Open source

Watch for

The privacy policy says inputs are used to train Browser Use's AI models, with no opt-out described outside Enterprise zero data retention

Browserless BB

Good for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 82 against 77

Watch for

REST and WebSocket routes take the API token as ?token= in the URL, which the docs give as the standard method

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBrowser UseBrowserlessEdge
Reliability16%208782Browser Use +5
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28589Browserless +4
Agent ergonomics13%16.27878even
Security & auth14%17.55953Browser Use +6
Payments & pricing10%12.59040Browser Use +50
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87782Browserless +5
Transparency & trust7%8.86562Browser Use +3
Negative events≤1500
Total77.9 · BB70.4 · BB

Facts side by side

FactBrowser UseBrowserless
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorBrowser Usebrowserless.io, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.browser-use.com/api/v4https://production-sfo.browserless.io
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402yesno
LicenceMIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of serviceSSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary
Tools exposed714
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrycom.browser-use/browser-usenot listed
Last release2026-10-072026-10-05
Terms last updated2026-07-15no date given
Privacy policy last updatedno date givenno date given
Customer content may train modelsyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Popularity117k stars, 107k npm/wk, 2.1M PyPI/wk14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk

Verdicts

Browser Use

The hosted cloud accepts x402 top-ups in USDC on Base with no account or API key, and publishes prices, rate limits and three OpenAPI documents. The privacy policy says inputs are used to train Browser Use's models, API keys have no documented scopes, and no prompt-injection guidance was found in the docs.

Browserless

An OpenAPI document, llms.txt and a 14-tool MCP server with annotations on every tool make the service easy for an agent to read, and the free plan needs no card. The API token travels in the URL query string by default, cloud tokens carry no scopes, and no machine payment route exists.

Before you call either

Browser Use

  1. Send the key as X-Browser-Use-API-Key with no Bearer prefix. A Bearer header returns 401
  2. Stop browsers with PATCH /api/v4/browsers/{id} and {"action":"stop"}. Closing CDP or the SDK client leaves the browser billing
  3. Poll GET /runs/{id}/status, not the full run, and wait for the returned Retry-After on 429, which can be 300 seconds at the edge
  4. Before resubmitting after a timeout, read the existing run's status. The server keeps running and may already have submitted a form
  5. With a wallet and no key, call x402.api.browser-use.com on /api/v2 or /api/v3 routes. A task stops with INSUFFICIENT_CREDITS if credit runs out mid-run

Browserless

  1. Send the token as Authorization: Bearer to the MCP server. On REST and WebSocket routes it goes in ?token=, so keep those URLs out of logs
  2. Close sessions as soon as the work is done. Browser time bills one unit per 30 seconds, rounded up, idle or not
  3. For multi-step work with browserless_agent, set keepSessionAlive: true on the first call and pass the returned sessionId after that. Sessions are one-shot by default since server 1.33.0
  4. On 429, back off and retry. It means the plan's concurrency limit or queue is full, usually from sessions left open
  5. Match the path to the protocol. Use /chromium for CDP clients and /chromium/playwright only for playwright.connect()

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Browser Use or Browserless?

Browser Use scores 77.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Browserless's 70.4 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Browserless leads on maintenance & community.

Do Browser Use and Browserless need an API key?

Browser Use needs an API key. Browserless takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. An agent can also pay Browser Use per call over x402, with no account.

Can an agent call Browser Use and Browserless without installing anything?

Yes. Browser Use has a hosted endpoint at https://api.browser-use.com/api/v4 and Browserless at https://production-sfo.browserless.io.

Are Browser Use and Browserless open source?

Browser Use is open source (MIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of service). No open-source release is listed for Browserless.

Other comparisons with Browser Use or Browserless

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.