Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Lightpanda vs Skyvern
Skyvern scores 63.3 (B) on agent readiness against Lightpanda's 61.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Lightpanda leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do browser automation.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 171 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and crawlers that read and fill many JavaScript pages in parallel on small machines, without needing pixel rendering.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 32
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Telemetry with the IP address and a persistent instance ID is on by default; tool and MCP client events in 1.0.2 aren't in the privacy policy's list
Skyvern B
Best for Agents that must finish a multi-step job on sites with logins, 2FA and forms, where stored credentials, saved workflows and cached scripts matter more than raw browser time.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 82
- Security & auth, 59 against 46
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 73
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 65
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Every API key and OAuth token has full organisation authority. The docs state there are no read-only, per-endpoint or per-resource keys
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lightpanda | Skyvern | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 57 | Lightpanda +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 88 | Skyvern +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 75 | 76 | Skyvern +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 46 | 59 | Skyvern +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 32 | Lightpanda +8 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 85 | Skyvern +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 74 | Skyvern +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -3 | |
| Total | C 61.6/100 | B 63.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lightpanda | Skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Selecy SAS (Lightpanda) | Ikonomos Inc. (Skyvern) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skyvern.com/v1 |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 for the browser. The npm wrapper @lightpanda/browser and the agent skill are Apache-2.0. Lightpanda Cloud is a closed service with no terms of service found | AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository |
| Tools exposed | 32 | 114 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Skyvern-AI/skyvern |
| Last release | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-02-27 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-03 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 9.3k npm/wk | 23k stars, 3.2k npm/wk, 1.6k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Lightpanda
Version 1.0.2 runs locally with no account, and its 32-tool MCP server has typed schemas, an annotation on every tool and guidance to treat pages as untrusted. Telemetry is on by default, the CDP and HTTP MCP servers have no authentication, the cloud documents its token in the URL, and no status page or cloud terms were found.
Skyvern
The hosted MCP server annotates every tool as read-only or destructive and can advertise a 29 or 32-tool subset in place of 114, and the API has a written six-month deprecation policy. Every key and OAuth token carries full organisation authority, with no read-only or scoped credential, and no request rate limits are documented.
Before you call either
Lightpanda
- Set
LIGHTPANDA_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=truein the server's environment if usage data, the IP address and an instance ID shouldn't leave the machine. - Treat text from
markdown,html,treeandlinksas untrusted page content, never as instructions. - Pass credentials as
$LP_*placeholders in tool arguments and callgetEnvwithout a name; naming a variable returns its value. - Check
httpStatusinstructuredContentaftergoto, since a 404 page or a load timeout is still reported as a successful navigation. - Keep
lightpanda serveandlightpanda mcp --porton 127.0.0.1 or a Unix socket; neither checks who connects.
Skyvern
- Connect to https://api.skyvern.com/mcp/x/lean or /x/operate, or send
X-Skyvern-Scope, so the client loads 32 or 29 tools. The scope filters the list and does not limit permissions - Use a separate Skyvern organisation for each blast radius. Any key or OAuth token can read and write stored credentials and delete workflows
- Never pass passwords to
skyvern_actorskyvern_type. Store them as credentials and callskyvern_login - Set
max_stepson tasks, orx-max-steps-overrideon agent runs, to cap credits. A run that reaches the cap ends astimed_out - On 503 from POST /v1/run/agents, wait
Retry-Afterseconds. No run was created, so resubmitting is safe
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lightpanda or Skyvern?
Skyvern scores 63.3 (B) on agent readiness against Lightpanda's 61.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Lightpanda leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Do Lightpanda and Skyvern need an API key?
Lightpanda needs no key. Skyvern takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Lightpanda and Skyvern without installing anything?
Lightpanda runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Skyvern has a hosted endpoint at https://api.skyvern.com/v1.
Are Lightpanda and Skyvern open source?
Yes. Lightpanda is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the browser. The npm wrapper @lightpanda/browser and the agent skill are Apache-2.0. Lightpanda Cloud is a closed service with no terms of service found). Skyvern is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository).
Other comparisons with Lightpanda or Skyvern
- agent-browser vs Lightpanda
- agent-browser vs Skyvern
- Airtop vs Lightpanda
- Airtop vs Skyvern
- Anchor Browser vs Lightpanda
- Anchor Browser vs Skyvern
- Browser Use vs Lightpanda
- Browser Use vs Skyvern
- Browserbase vs Lightpanda
- Browserless vs Lightpanda
- Browserless vs Skyvern
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Lightpanda
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Skyvern
- Functionize MCP server vs Lightpanda
- Functionize MCP server vs Skyvern
- Hyperbrowser vs Lightpanda
- Hyperbrowser vs Skyvern
- Lightpanda vs Notte
- Lightpanda vs Playwright MCP
- Lightpanda vs Pomerado
- Lightpanda vs Puppeteer
- Lightpanda vs Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server)
- Lightpanda vs Selenium
- Lightpanda vs Steel
- Lightpanda vs TinyFish
- Notte vs Skyvern
- Playwright MCP vs Skyvern
- Pomerado vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer vs Skyvern
- Selenium vs Skyvern
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Skyvern vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Skyvern
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lightpanda-vs-skyvern.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lightpanda.json·/api/v1/tools/skyvern.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lightpanda skyvern(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lightpanda", "b": "skyvern"}at/mcp, no key