Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run

Puppeteer vs Skyvern

Puppeteer scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do browser automation.

Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 120 browser comparisons

Which one, for what

Puppeteer BB

Best for Agents that write and run Node.js scripts against Chrome or Firefox.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 57
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 32

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • No key needed to call it
  • No incidents deducted, where Skyvern loses 3 points for them

Watch for

No MCP server, CLI or llms.txt of its own. The docs point agents to the separate chrome-devtools-mcp project

Skyvern B

Best for Agents that must finish a multi-step job on sites with logins, 2FA and forms, where stored credentials, saved workflows and cached scripts matter more than raw browser time.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 88 against 81
  • Agent ergonomics, 76 against 67
  • Security & auth, 59 against 52

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Runs on your own machine
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

Every API key and OAuth token has full organisation authority. The docs state there are no read-only, per-endpoint or per-resource keys

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPuppeteerSkyvernEdge
Reliability16%208057Puppeteer +23
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28188Skyvern +7
Agent ergonomics13%16.26776Skyvern +9
Security & auth14%17.55259Skyvern +7
Payments & pricing10%12.56032Puppeteer +28
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88985Puppeteer +4
Transparency & trust7%8.87072Skyvern +2
Negative events≤150-3
TotalBB 70.6/100B 63.1/100

Facts side by side

FactPuppeteerSkyvern
KindSDK + MCPHTTP API
VendorGoogleIkonomos Inc. (Skyvern)
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.skyvern.com/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository
Tools exposednone114
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.Skyvern-AI/skyvern
Last release2026-10-082026-10-01
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-02-27
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity96k stars, 11.5M npm/wk23k stars, 3.2k npm/wk, 1.6k PyPI/wk

Verdicts

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a stable, Apache-2.0 library on 25.13.0, with ten releases since 27 July 2026, typed APIs, locators that wait and retry, and accessibility snapshots an agent can read. It has no MCP server or llms.txt of its own, and 10 of the 20 most recent CI runs on main failed between 7 and 13 October 2026.

Skyvern

The hosted MCP server annotates every tool as read-only or destructive and can advertise a 29 or 32-tool subset in place of 114, and the API has a written six-month deprecation policy. Every key and OAuth token carries full organisation authority, with no read-only or scoped credential, and no request rate limits are documented.

Before you call either

Puppeteer

  1. Install with npm i puppeteer, which downloads a matching Chrome for Testing. Use puppeteer-core to bring your own browser
  2. Prefer page.locator() over page.$(). Locators wait for the element to be visible and stable before acting
  3. Read pages with page.accessibility.snapshot({interestingOnly: true}) rather than full HTML to keep output short
  4. Catch TimeoutError separately from TargetCloseError. The first can be retried, the second needs a new page or browser
  5. Packages are ESM only since 25.0.0. Use import puppeteer from 'puppeteer' rather than require

Skyvern

  1. Connect to https://api.skyvern.com/mcp/x/lean or /x/operate, or send X-Skyvern-Scope, so the client loads 32 or 29 tools. The scope filters the list and does not limit permissions
  2. Use a separate Skyvern organisation for each blast radius. Any key or OAuth token can read and write stored credentials and delete workflows
  3. Never pass passwords to skyvern_act or skyvern_type. Store them as credentials and call skyvern_login
  4. Set max_steps on tasks, or x-max-steps-override on agent runs, to cap credits. A run that reaches the cap ends as timed_out
  5. On 503 from POST /v1/run/agents, wait Retry-After seconds. No run was created, so resubmitting is safe

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Puppeteer or Skyvern?

Puppeteer scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and security & auth.

Can an agent call Puppeteer and Skyvern without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Puppeteer. Skyvern has a hosted endpoint at https://api.skyvern.com/v1.

Are Puppeteer and Skyvern open source?

Yes. Puppeteer is open source (Apache-2.0). Skyvern is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository).

Other comparisons with Puppeteer or Skyvern

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.