Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run
Selenium vs Skyvern
Selenium scores 73.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do browser automation.
Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 120 browser comparisons
Which one, for what
Selenium BB
Best for Agents that write test or automation scripts in any of five languages, and teams with a Grid.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 90 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 32
- Maintenance & community, 94 against 85
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
- No incidents deducted, where Skyvern loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No MCP server from the project. The docs point to community servers and say they are third-party
Skyvern B
Best for Agents that must finish a multi-step job on sites with logins, 2FA and forms, where stored credentials, saved workflows and cached scripts matter more than raw browser time.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 70
- Security & auth, 59 against 43
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Every API key and OAuth token has full organisation authority. The docs state there are no read-only, per-endpoint or per-resource keys
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Selenium | Skyvern | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 90 | 57 | Selenium +33 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 88 | Selenium +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 76 | Skyvern +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 59 | Skyvern +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 32 | Selenium +28 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 94 | 85 | Selenium +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 72 | Selenium +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | BB 73.6/100 | B 63.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Selenium | Skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Selenium project (Software Freedom Conservancy) | Ikonomos Inc. (Skyvern) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skyvern.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository |
| Tools exposed | none | 114 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Skyvern-AI/skyvern |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-02-27 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 35k stars, 1.8M npm/wk, 6.9M PyPI/wk | 23k stars, 3.2k npm/wk, 1.6k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Selenium
Selenium is stable, Apache-2.0 software on 4.51.0 with bindings in five languages, CI passing on trunk, an llms.txt and an agent guide added in September 2026. It has no MCP server of its own, Selenium Manager sends usage statistics by default, and Grid accepts unauthenticated sessions unless a username and password are set.
Skyvern
The hosted MCP server annotates every tool as read-only or destructive and can advertise a 29 or 32-tool subset in place of 114, and the API has a written six-month deprecation policy. Every key and OAuth token carries full organisation authority, with no read-only or scoped credential, and no request rate limits are documented.
Before you call either
Selenium
- Install with
pip install selenium(Python 3.10 or later) and let Selenium Manager fetch drivers. Do not set driver paths - Use
WebDriverWaitwith expected conditions, never fixed sleeps, and do not mix implicit and explicit waits - Set
SE_AVOID_STATS=trueto stop Selenium Manager sending usage statistics - Point coding agents at https://www.selenium.dev/llms.txt. Most Selenium 2 and 3 era examples use removed APIs
- Set
--usernameand--passwordbefore exposing a Grid beyond localhost. Checkhttp://localhost:4444/statusbefore creating sessions
Skyvern
- Connect to https://api.skyvern.com/mcp/x/lean or /x/operate, or send
X-Skyvern-Scope, so the client loads 32 or 29 tools. The scope filters the list and does not limit permissions - Use a separate Skyvern organisation for each blast radius. Any key or OAuth token can read and write stored credentials and delete workflows
- Never pass passwords to
skyvern_actorskyvern_type. Store them as credentials and callskyvern_login - Set
max_stepson tasks, orx-max-steps-overrideon agent runs, to cap credits. A run that reaches the cap ends astimed_out - On 503 from POST /v1/run/agents, wait
Retry-Afterseconds. No run was created, so resubmitting is safe
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Selenium or Skyvern?
Selenium scores 73.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Skyvern's 63.1 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Skyvern leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth.
Can an agent call Selenium and Skyvern without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Selenium. Skyvern has a hosted endpoint at https://api.skyvern.com/v1.
Are Selenium and Skyvern open source?
Yes. Selenium is open source (Apache-2.0). Skyvern is open source (AGPL-3.0 for the open-source server, SDKs and MCP server. Skyvern Cloud is a proprietary service under Skyvern's terms, and its anti-bot measures aren't in the repository).
Other comparisons with Selenium or Skyvern
- agent-browser vs Selenium
- agent-browser vs Skyvern
- Airtop vs Selenium
- Airtop vs Skyvern
- Anchor Browser vs Selenium
- Anchor Browser vs Skyvern
- Browser Use vs Selenium
- Browser Use vs Skyvern
- Browserbase vs Selenium
- Browserless vs Selenium
- Browserless vs Skyvern
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Selenium
- Chrome DevTools MCP vs Skyvern
- Hyperbrowser vs Selenium
- Hyperbrowser vs Skyvern
- Notte vs Selenium
- Notte vs Skyvern
- Playwright MCP vs Selenium
- Playwright MCP vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Selenium
- Puppeteer (archived MCP reference server) vs Skyvern
- Puppeteer vs Selenium
- Puppeteer vs Skyvern
- Selenium vs Steel
- Selenium vs TinyFish
- Skyvern vs Steel
- Skyvern vs TinyFish
- Browserbase vs Skyvern
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/selenium-vs-skyvern.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/selenium.json·/api/v1/tools/skyvern.json - From a terminal
anchor compare selenium skyvern(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "selenium", "b": "skyvern"}at/mcp, no key