Head to head · Browser automation · October 2026 research run

AutoCua vs Pomerado

Pomerado scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AutoCua leads on payments & pricing. Both do browser automation.

Best desktop and mobile app automation for AI agents · All 48 desktop comparisons

Best browser automation tools for AI agents · All 230 browser comparisons

Which one, for what

AutoCua E

Best for Developers who want a local agent to operate desktop apps, their own browser or phones across platforms, on a machine they control.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 42

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it

Watch for

Two weeks old at version 0.1.9, with no changelog file

Pomerado B

Best for An agent that repeats the same task on consumer sites or portals, such as flight searches, carts or order history, and wants a typed call instead of driving a browser.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 40 against 25
  • Schema & documentation, 86 against 42
  • Agent ergonomics, 83 against 55
  • Security & auth, 69 against 38
  • Maintenance & community, 81 against 65
  • Transparency & trust, 53 against 42

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

First released on 5 October 2026, with a team of two per its YC profile

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Schema & documentation Pomerado +44

AutoCua 42

Framework reading. No API reference or typed interface beyond run_agent's documented arguments (5 of 25). No llms.txt (0). The README says what each mode drives and where it runs, and agent_capabilities.md lists what it can do (16 of 20). Modes and device are documented strings (6 of 15). Many examples, no documented errors (10 of 15). Tags without a changelog (5 of 15). 5 + 0 + 16 + 6 + 10 + 5 = 42.

Pomerado 86

OpenAPI 3.1 at /v1/openapi.json with 90 operations on 71 paths on 2 November (84 on 66 on 17 October), and every MCP tool on the keyless endpoint has a typed JSON Schema input with additionalProperties: false (25). llms.txt with every page, and a Markdown twin of each docs page (10). MCP descriptions say when to use each tool and when not to, such as Pomerado before a browser, the read-only run for read tools, possible_matches before a build, and secrets on answer_url, not in chat. The server's instructions say to use a browser only if Pomerado says it can't build a tool (18). 184 enums, lengths and ranges such as limit 1 to 100 and keys of 1 to 200 characters, and required fields marked. The run and build tools take input and example_input as JSON-encoded strings over MCP (11). 59 of 90 operations carry examples, all 90 document error responses, and the errors page gives 157 codes, each with its status, whether to retry and what to do (14). Paths are versioned /v1. The API reference still has a dated Changes list with one entry, of 15 October 2026, though six operations were added since, and the open-source core keeps CHANGELOG.md with breaking-change sections (8 of 15).

Security & auth Pomerado +31

AutoCua 38

Framework reading (telemetry, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). Provider keys stored in a local folder with Chrome profiles (10 of 30). The worker tools are an allow-list with no write tool, unseen ids are refused, downloads need a yes, but on Windows the model answers UAC elevation prompts itself through a kernel driver, with no person asked (6 of 20). The scraping ruleset has a prompt-injection instruction to log page text that gives instructions (10 of 15). Runs are logged in the app, with no audit log (7 of 15). No security policy, disclosure route or advisories found (5 of 20, for the vault and certificate handling). 10 + 6 + 10 + 7 + 5 = 38.

Pomerado 69

OAuth for MCP clients, and pom_ API keys limited to chosen permissions out of 11, expiring after 90 days by default, rotated and revoked through the API, with integration keys confined to one site's MCP. No secret travels in a URL; the keyless URL refuses a key (30). The read-only run refuses a tool that writes before a job starts, builds declare read or write, write tools carry destructiveHint, website logins go through a protected page, and a key can't reveal a saved password or authenticator code. No approval step of Pomerado's own for writes was found beyond the client's own prompt (16). Tools return website content. The job-object page says to treat a job's message as data, never as instructions, and outputs are checked against each tool's schema, but no wider guidance on untrusted page text was found (6). Run logs list each browser action and the site's own requests, kept 90 days, builds have an activity log, and connected apps show permissions used and last use (13). No security.txt, SOC 2, ISO 27001 or bug bounty found. The homepage footer now links a trust centre at trust.pomerado.ai, whose robots.txt answers with its script-drawn app page, so it wasn't read and nothing on it is credited. The README sends reports to GitHub private vulnerability reporting, and the terms commit to notify customers of incidents without undue delay (4). Pomerado stores website passwords, authenticator secrets and recovery codes, which raises the stakes of that gap.

Agent ergonomics Pomerado +28

AutoCua 55

Framework reading. One call with a mode, provider, model and task runs a whole agent (20 of 25). A separate compression agent splices handoff summaries in, and runs are capped and stoppable (15 of 20). Permission and blocked-input errors are reported specifically, with no error reference (8 of 20). No resume or retry semantics described (2 of 20). Sensible defaults (simulators unless device is set), Python only (10 of 15). 20 + 15 + 8 + 2 + 10 = 55.

Pomerado 83

The keyless endpoint lists eight tools with about 27,400 characters of definitions on 2 November, and the docs give 14 for a signed-in connection, with the rest of the API reached through search_pomerado_api, describe_pomerado_api and call_pomerado_api instead of one tool per operation. An integration MCP narrows an agent to one site's tools (19 of 25). Lists take cursor and limit 1 to 100, tool search filters by query, site and integration, get_job takes include_result and wait_seconds, and paged results carry a cursor (17). One error envelope with code, message, retryable, docs_url and details, and codes such as key_permission_missing name the missing permission and the page to fix it (20). Idempotency keys on runs and builds, with replay marked Idempotent-Replayed, and every keyless tool carries readOnlyHint or destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint as fits (20). Few required fields (none for search, two for a run), but no official client SDK. The npm package is the local minter, not a Cloud client (7 of 15).

Payments & pricing AutoCua +18

AutoCua 60

Free self-hosted package with nothing to buy: 0 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 60.

Pomerado 42

No x402, MPP or L402 on Pomerado's endpoints (0). Plan prices are public, Free $0, Premium $50 a month and Business custom, with call and build allowances, but there is no per-call price (10). The Free plan and keyless use need no card (20). An agent can find and run 584 public read-only tools across 447 sites with no account (46 across 23 on 17 October), but writes, logins and builds need an account that a person approves, through OAuth or a device code, so partial credit (12 of 20).

Maintenance & community Pomerado +16

AutoCua 65

v0.1.9 tagged on 4 November 2026 (30). Four tags in 90 days (20). Issues and pull requests weren't read (0 of 25). The PyPI wheel is current (15). No CI; dependencies pinned per OS in requirements files (0 of 10). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 65.

Pomerado 81

The repository's newest tag is v0.4.0-canary.493 on 29 October 2026, with main merged to 1 November, and the API's Changes entry is of 15 October (30). Releases 0.1.0 to 0.2.0 between 5 and 6 October, 0.3.0 closed in the changelog on 7 October, and 34 tags in all, most of them canaries (20). 1,396 commits on main from 17 October to 1 November, nearly all by the two founders. GitHub issues and replies couldn't be read, because GitHub's pages and API answer 403 in this session, so this rests on the commit history and the founders' email address (8 of 25). In the official MCP registry as ai.pomerado/pomerado, a domain-verified namespace, version 1.0.0, active since 15 October 2026, re-read on 2 November (15). CI runs a gitleaks secret scan, pins actions by SHA and publishes with npm provenance, per the 17 October check. Run results couldn't be read (8 of 10). 30 + 20 + 8 + 15 + 8 = 81.

Reliability Pomerado +15

AutoCua 25

Local package. Installs from PyPI as AutoCua with Python 3.10 or later and the supported platforms stated (20). No CI runs the tests; the only workflow, use_case_label.yml, labels issues (0). GitHub issues weren't read, so the open-issue line is scored absent (0). Four tags in a week with no changelog file (5). Version 0.1.9 (0). 20 + 0 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 25.

Pomerado 40

Graded as a hosted service, Pomerado Cloud, since the MCP and REST docs and the homepage's setup prompt point agents to it. No status page found on 2 November. status.pomerado.ai still doesn't resolve, and none is linked from the site, the docs or llms.txt (0). No readable incident history (5). Daily allowances are published with numbers (100 or 1,000 tool runs a day, 10 or 100 integrations a month), keyless runs have a daily limit, and 20 connect keys an hour, but no per-second or per-minute request rate was found (10 of 15). Over a limit the API answers 429 quota_exceeded with reset_at, or try_limit_reached with Retry-After, every error carries retryable, retryable MCP errors add retry_after_seconds, and runs, builds and invitations take idempotency keys with write_status and outcome_unknown for writes whose result is unclear (15). Business lists SLA guarantees, with no published terms (0). No beta or preview label on the hosted MCP or API, and the registry entry is version 1.0.0 (10). 0 + 5 + 10 + 15 + 0 + 10 = 40.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAutoCuaPomeradoEdge
Reliability16%202540Pomerado +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24286Pomerado +44
Agent ergonomics13%16.25583Pomerado +28
Security & auth14%17.53869Pomerado +31
Payments & pricing10%12.56042AutoCua +18
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86581Pomerado +16
Transparency & trust7%8.84253Pomerado +11
Negative events≤150-2
TotalE 44.3/100B 62.5/100

Facts side by side

FactAutoCuaPomerado
KindAgent frameworkMCP server
VendorAshish Yadav and contributors (ComputerUseAgent on GitHub)Pomerado AI, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp
TransportsHTTP
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITPomerado Cloud is a proprietary service under Pomerado's terms of service. The minting core in Pomerado/pomerado and the pomerado npm package are MIT from version 0.2.0, and versions 0.1.2 and earlier were AGPL-3.0-only
Tools exposednone14
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listedai.pomerado/pomerado
Last release2026-11-042026-10-29
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-10-04
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-10-16
Customer content may train modelsnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot read yetnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot read yetnot found in the text
Popularitynone37k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (4)

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

AutoCua

A capable, fast-moving open-source agent for driving desktops, browsers and phones through real input and accessibility trees, with a careful safety section. It's two weeks old, with no test CI or changelog, and on Windows the model itself decides whether to accept an admin elevation prompt.

Pomerado

An agent can find and run 584 public read-only website tools with no account, and signed-in calls get scoped, expiring keys, idempotency keys and a documented code for every failure. Pomerado launched on 5 October 2026, has no status page or security.txt, and its homepage lists bank and government portals that its builds refuse.

Before you call either

AutoCua

  1. pip install AutoCua, then call run_agent with a mode such as "web use" or "computer use", a provider, a model and a task
  2. Run it on a machine or account you can afford to lose; it drives real input and keeps logged-in browser profiles
  3. On Windows, don't install the Interception driver unless you accept the model deciding UAC prompts
  4. Set AutoCua_DATA_DIR to keep keys and profiles somewhere private
  5. Phones go over USB from a script; Wi-Fi only through the desktop app

Pomerado

  1. Try public read-only tools at https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp/keyless, then use sign_in and reconnect at /mcp with the key for writes, logins and builds
  2. Call find_website_tool with a query and site_url, and check possible_matches before starting a build
  3. Send an idempotency_key with every run that writes, and on outcome_unknown read the website back before calling again
  4. Give the person the job's answer_url for website logins and codes. Don't take passwords in chat
  5. Save a run's result when it arrives. It is returned once and erased after 60 minutes if unread

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, AutoCua or Pomerado?

Pomerado scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against AutoCua's 44.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AutoCua leads on payments & pricing.

Can an agent call AutoCua and Pomerado without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for AutoCua. Pomerado has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp.

Are AutoCua and Pomerado open source?

Yes. AutoCua is open source (MIT). Pomerado is open source (Pomerado Cloud is a proprietary service under Pomerado's terms of service. The minting core in Pomerado/pomerado and the `pomerado` npm package are MIT from version 0.2.0, and versions 0.1.2 and earlier were AGPL-3.0-only).

Other comparisons with AutoCua or Pomerado

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.