Head to head · Decision models · October 2026 research run

SPEV vs Jev

Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against SPEV's 51.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. SPEV leads on payments & pricing. Both do decision models.

Best decision models for AI agents · All 136 decisions comparisons

Which one, for what

SPEV D

Best for Typed decisions over raw audio, such as end-of-turn detection, call triage and flagging, plus text and single images, hosted or self-hosted.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 20

Watch for

Published on 14 October 2026, with no service record, no status page and no API changelog

Jev B

Best for High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 81
  • Agent ergonomics, 84 against 76
  • Security & auth, 53 against 33
  • Maintenance & community, 64 against 49

Watch for

Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runSPEVJevEdge
Reliability16%204560Jev +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28187Jev +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.27684Jev +8
Security & auth14%17.53353Jev +20
Payments & pricing10%12.53020SPEV +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84964Jev +15
Transparency & trust7%8.85456Jev +2
Negative events≤15-20
TotalD 51.1/100B 62.1/100

Facts side by side

FactSPEVJev
KindModel APIModel API
VendorSpragTypeSafe AI
Hosted endpointhttps://api.sprag.ai/v1/decisionshttps://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (weights and inference code, following the Qwen3-Omni base). Training code and data aren't publishedProprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-142026-09-26
Terms last updated2026-09-01no date given
Privacy policy last updated2026-08-01no date given
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-outnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes
Popularitynone15 stars
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (2)

Verdicts

SPEV

SPEV answers typed questions over text, audio or an image in one call, with a public OpenAPI schema and Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face. It is a day old, has an 8,192-token context, no status page or changelog, and Sprag's terms let it train on API content unless the customer opts out by email.

Jev

Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.

Before you call either

SPEV

  1. Send model: "spev" to POST https://api.sprag.ai/v1/decisions with a bearer key. /v1/systemone returns 410
  2. Ask every question about one piece of evidence in one request. Answers come back in question order
  3. Send audio as base64 in input_audio with format, not as a data URL, and at most one image across all messages
  4. Keep evidence and questions under 8,192 tokens. Over the limit returns 400 model_limit_exceeded
  5. Back off on 429 and 503 for Retry-After seconds. Limits are 60 requests a minute per organisation by default
  6. Handle an answer of type refusal, which carries no probabilities

Jev

  1. Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
  2. Pin jev-1.13.0 instead of jev-latest once you've tuned confidence thresholds
  3. Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
  4. Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
  5. Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, SPEV or Jev?

Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against SPEV's 51.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. SPEV leads on payments & pricing.

Do SPEV and Jev need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call SPEV and Jev without installing anything?

Yes. SPEV has a hosted endpoint at https://api.sprag.ai/v1/decisions and Jev at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone.

Other comparisons with SPEV or Jev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.