Head to head · Inference decision · October 2026 research run
Laya vs Jev
Laya has a score of 69.2 (B) against Jev's 62.2 (B). Both do inference decision. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Laya for
- reliability (+5)
- payments & pricing (+40)
- maintenance & community (+19)
Pick Jev for
- schema & documentation (+7)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laya | Jev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 60 | Laya +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 87 | Jev +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 84 | Jev +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 53 | Laya +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | Laya +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 64 | Laya +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 58 | Laya +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 69.2 · B | 62.2 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laya | Jev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Convai Innovations | TypeSafe AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 8 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-26 |
| Popularity | 29k stars | 15 stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Laya
Apache-2.0 code and weights, installed with pip install laya, with Python 3.10 to 3.13 tested in CI. Base checkpoints score 0.362 and 0.352 on the maintainers' typed-decisions benchmark against a 0.318 random baseline, so it needs fine-tuning.
Jev
Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.
Before you call either
Laya
- Set
LAYA_API_KEYbefore startinglaya-serve. It listens on every interface by default - Gate on
answer_confidence, notconfidence, which measures entropy and doesn't match Jev's field - Shortlist choice questions with more than about 20 options using
predict_shortlistor thelaya_shortlisttool - Use semantic or opaque labels such as
AandB, notyesandno, in choice questions. The checkpoints can follow the label text - Pass
model="multilingual"andmax_len=8192for long documents. The English checkpoint stops at 512 tokens
Jev
- Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
- Pin
jev-1.13.0instead ofjev-latestonce you've tuned confidence thresholds - Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
- Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
- Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger
Other comparisons with Laya or Jev
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/convai-laya.json·/api/v1/tools/typesafe-jev.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/convai-laya-vs-typesafe-jev.md