Head to head · Inference decision · October 2026 research run

Decider vs Jev

Decider scores 69.5 (B) on agent readiness against Jev's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Jev leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do inference decision.

Which one, for what

Decider B

Good for Local classification, routing, triage and checks where a team wants open weights in several sizes and a Jev-shaped route.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 90 against 60
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 87 against 64

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

The local server has no authentication option. It binds to 127.0.0.1 since 1.7.1

Jev B

Good for High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 78
  • Security & auth, 53 against 38
  • Transparency & trust, 56 against 46

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runDeciderJevEdge
Reliability16%209060Decider +30
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27887Jev +9
Agent ergonomics13%16.28084Jev +4
Security & auth14%17.53853Jev +15
Payments & pricing10%12.56020Decider +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88764Decider +23
Transparency & trust7%8.84656Jev +10
Negative events≤1500
Total69.5 · B62.1 · B

Facts side by side

FactDeciderJev
KindModel APIModel API
VendorMark Marosi (Mapika)TypeSafe AI
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthNoneAPI key
PricingFreePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (code and weights)Proprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-072026-09-26
Terms last updatedno document linkedno date given
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity1.1k stars, 2.7k PyPI/wk15 stars
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Decider

An Apache-2.0 decision model family with a dated changelog, passing CI, 21 package releases since 22 September 2026 and model cards that list measured regressions. One person maintains it, the local server has no authentication option, states over 32,768 tokens are cut without an error, and no security policy is published.

Jev

Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.

Before you call either

Decider

  1. Pin weights by Hub tag (v10, v2) when results must repeat. The main branch of each model repository changes with new versions
  2. Read x_p_max for the top probability. Since 1.3.0 confidence on choice and score answers follows TypeSafe's rescaled definition, not the top probability
  3. Keep the server on 127.0.0.1 or put an authenticating proxy in front. It has no key option
  4. Count state tokens before sending. Over 32,768 the state is cut silently, and /decide caps context at 1,536 tokens
  5. Split multi-step arithmetic or multi-hop judgements into several questions, and don't write long rules into a question. The README says both fail

Jev

  1. Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
  2. Pin jev-1.13.0 instead of jev-latest once you've tuned confidence thresholds
  3. Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
  4. Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
  5. Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Decider or Jev?

Decider scores 69.5 (B) on agent readiness against Jev's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Jev leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust.

Do Decider and Jev need an API key?

Decider needs no key. Jev needs an API key.

Can an agent call Decider and Jev without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Decider. Jev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone.

Are Decider and Jev open source?

Decider is open source (Apache-2.0 (code and weights)). No open-source release is listed for Jev.

Other comparisons with Decider or Jev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.