Head to head · Decision models · October 2026 research run

ScaleDown vs Jev

Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against ScaleDown's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScaleDown leads on payments & pricing. Both do decision models.

Best decision models for AI agents · All 120 decisions comparisons

Best document parsing, OCR and extraction APIs for AI agents · All 124 documents comparisons

Which one, for what

ScaleDown D

Best for Cheap, high-volume labelling, routing and yes or no checks where a probability is more useful than prose, and for pulling described fields with offsets from text, images or PDFs.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No status page, no published rate limits and no SLA outside enterprise contracts

Jev B

Best for High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 20
  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 69
  • Agent ergonomics, 84 against 76
  • Security & auth, 53 against 48
  • Maintenance & community, 64 against 56

Watch for

Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runScaleDownJevEdge
Reliability16%202060Jev +40
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26987Jev +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.27684Jev +8
Security & auth14%17.54853Jev +5
Payments & pricing10%12.54020ScaleDown +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85664Jev +8
Transparency & trust7%8.85456Jev +2
Negative events≤15-20
TotalD 48.6/100B 62.1/100

Facts side by side

FactScaleDownJev
KindModel APIModel API
VendorCarbon ScaleDown, Inc.TypeSafe AI
Hosted endpointhttps://api.scaledown.xyzhttps://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceProprietary hosted models under ScaleDown's Terms of Service. The langchain-scaledown integration is MITProprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-142026-09-26
Terms last updatedcouldn't be readno date given
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be readno date given
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be readnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be readnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be readyes
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be readnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be readyes
Popularity0 stars15 stars
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (2)

Verdicts

ScaleDown

Classify answers Jev-shaped choice, noul and score questions with probabilities, and Extract returns values with confidences and character offsets, at $0.05 per million input tokens with output free. There is no status page, no published rate limit and no public changelog, and the site's compliance claims contradict each other.

Jev

Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.

Before you call either

ScaleDown

  1. Send several questions about one item in one /v1/scaledown call. Each becomes its own Classify call and the usage is summed
  2. Pin classify-1, extract-1 or summarize-1 once you've tuned thresholds on your own labelled cases
  3. Set context_chars to 0 and use top_n on Extract unless you need the 500 characters of context each side
  4. Set reasoning: false on /classify when you only need the label. The reasoning call bills its input at 2x
  5. Back off and retry on 429, 502 and 504. No limits are published and calls have no side effects

Jev

  1. Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
  2. Pin jev-1.13.0 instead of jev-latest once you've tuned confidence thresholds
  3. Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
  4. Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
  5. Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, ScaleDown or Jev?

Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against ScaleDown's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScaleDown leads on payments & pricing.

Do ScaleDown and Jev need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call ScaleDown and Jev without installing anything?

Yes. ScaleDown has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scaledown.xyz and Jev at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone.

Other comparisons with ScaleDown or Jev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.