Head to head · Decision models · October 2026 research run

GLiClass vs ScaleDown

GLiClass scores 49.9 (D) on agent readiness against ScaleDown's 48.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ScaleDown leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth and maintenance & community. Both do decision models.

Best decision models for AI agents · All 120 decisions comparisons

Best document parsing, OCR and extraction APIs for AI agents · All 124 documents comparisons

Which one, for what

GLiClass D

Best for Topic, intent and sentiment routing over a known label set on the owner's own CPU or GPU, where many labels must be scored at once.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 43 against 20
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
  • Transparency & trust, 64 against 54

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

No calibration evidence. The cards report F1 only, and the docs tell users to calibrate thresholds on their own traffic

ScaleDown D

Best for Cheap, high-volume labelling, routing and yes or no checks where a probability is more useful than prose, and for pulling described fields with offsets from text, images or PDFs.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 69 against 49
  • Agent ergonomics, 76 against 60
  • Security & auth, 48 against 38
  • Maintenance & community, 56 against 44

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No status page, no published rate limits and no SLA outside enterprise contracts

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGLiClassScaleDownEdge
Reliability16%204320GLiClass +23
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24969ScaleDown +20
Agent ergonomics13%16.26076ScaleDown +16
Security & auth14%17.53848ScaleDown +10
Payments & pricing10%12.56040GLiClass +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84456ScaleDown +12
Transparency & trust7%8.86454GLiClass +10
Negative events≤150-2
TotalD 49.9/100D 48.6/100

Facts side by side

FactGLiClassScaleDown
KindModel APIModel API
VendorKnowledgatorCarbon ScaleDown, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.scaledown.xyz
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthNoneAPI key
PricingFreePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (library and the model weights we checked)Proprietary hosted models under ScaleDown's Terms of Service. The langchain-scaledown integration is MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-07-212026-10-14
Terms last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be read
Popularity555 stars, 13k PyPI/wk0 stars

Verdicts

GLiClass

An Apache-2.0 classifier that scores a whole label set in one encoder pass on the owner's hardware, with single-label, multi-label, hierarchical and few-shot modes. It returns label scores with no calibration claim, the bundled server has no authentication, and the last three test runs on the main branch, on 24 September 2026, failed.

ScaleDown

Classify answers Jev-shaped choice, noul and score questions with probabilities, and Extract returns values with confidences and character offsets, at $0.05 per million input tokens with output free. There is no status page, no published rate limit and no public changelog, and the site's compliance claims contradict each other.

Before you call either

GLiClass

  1. Pass --host 127.0.0.1 to python -m gliclass.serve, or put the port behind your own gateway. The server checks no credential
  2. On a machine without a GPU add --device cpu --dtype float32 --num-gpus-per-replica 0. The default configuration expects CUDA
  3. Send one text a request to POST /gliclass. An array in texts is cut to its first item without an error
  4. Set multi_label to false for one label from a set. The default scores each label independently, so scores do not sum to 1
  5. Keep text plus labels under the pipeline's 1,024-token max_length, or use ZeroShotClassificationWithChunkingPipeline. Longer input is truncated silently

ScaleDown

  1. Send several questions about one item in one /v1/scaledown call. Each becomes its own Classify call and the usage is summed
  2. Pin classify-1, extract-1 or summarize-1 once you've tuned thresholds on your own labelled cases
  3. Set context_chars to 0 and use top_n on Extract unless you need the 500 characters of context each side
  4. Set reasoning: false on /classify when you only need the label. The reasoning call bills its input at 2x
  5. Back off and retry on 429, 502 and 504. No limits are published and calls have no side effects

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, GLiClass or ScaleDown?

GLiClass scores 49.9 (D) on agent readiness against ScaleDown's 48.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ScaleDown leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth and maintenance & community.

Do GLiClass and ScaleDown need an API key?

GLiClass needs no key. ScaleDown needs an API key.

Can an agent call GLiClass and ScaleDown without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for GLiClass. ScaleDown has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scaledown.xyz.

Are GLiClass and ScaleDown open source?

GLiClass is open source (Apache-2.0 (library and the model weights we checked)). No open-source release is listed for ScaleDown.

Other comparisons with GLiClass or ScaleDown

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.