Head to head · Decision models · October 2026 research run
pplx-decider vs Jev
pplx-decider and Jev score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.9 (B) and 62.1 (B). Jev leads on agent ergonomics. Both do decision models.
Best decision models for AI agents · All 66 decisions comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for High-volume classification, routing and rubric scoring over text and images where a team wants a low hosted price and the option to run the same weights itself.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 61 against 53
- Payments & pricing, 25 against 20
Watch for
The Decisions API was released in October 2026, so its incident record is days long, and Perplexity's FAQ says it gives no uptime guarantee
Jev B
Good for High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 84 against 76
Watch for
Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | pplx-decider | Jev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 61 | 60 | pplx-decider +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 90 | 87 | pplx-decider +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 84 | Jev +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 53 | pplx-decider +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 20 | pplx-decider +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 62 | 64 | Jev +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 56 | Jev +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 62.9 · B | 62.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | pplx-decider | Jev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Perplexity | TypeSafe AI |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.perplexity.ai/v1/decisions | https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| Price for decision models | free | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 for the published weights. The hosted Decisions API is a proprietary service | Proprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-09-26 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Popularity | none | 15 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
pplx-decider
The hosted Decisions API has an OpenAPI description, typed questions, documented limits and a published price of $0.02 per million input tokens, and the v1.1 weights are public under Apache-2.0. The API is days old, the official Python SDK has no method for it, and the governing terms and privacy notice could not be read on 9 October 2026.
Jev
Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.
Before you call either
pplx-decider
- Send
Authorization: Bearer. A key inx-api-keyreturns 401 on this endpoint. - Set
modelon every request. A missing or unknown model returns 400, and the guide shows a-latestname rejected. - Resize images to 2,048 tiles of 32 by 32 pixels or fewer before sending. Larger images end in a 504 after about a minute.
- Check the HTTP status before parsing an error. 404 and 405 have empty bodies, 504 can be HTML, and
error.codechanges type. - For the weights, use the repository's
autojevcode. The card says default causal inference does not reproduce the evaluated setup.
Jev
- Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
- Pin
jev-1.13.0instead ofjev-latestonce you've tuned confidence thresholds - Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
- Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
- Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, pplx-decider or Jev?
pplx-decider and Jev score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.9 (B) and 62.1 (B). Jev leads on agent ergonomics.
Do pplx-decider and Jev need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call pplx-decider and Jev without installing anything?
Yes. pplx-decider has a hosted endpoint at https://api.perplexity.ai/v1/decisions and Jev at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone.
Other comparisons with pplx-decider or Jev
- Celeris-1 Decision vs pplx-decider
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Jev
- Clef vs pplx-decider
- Clef vs Jev
- Laya vs pplx-decider
- Laya vs Jev
- Decider vs pplx-decider
- Decider vs Jev
- GLiClass vs pplx-decider
- GLiClass vs Jev
- Kev vs pplx-decider
- Kev vs Jev
- Liquid d1 vs pplx-decider
- Liquid d1 vs Jev
- OpenAI Decisions API vs pplx-decider
- OpenAI Decisions API vs Jev
- pplx-decider vs Strands Decider 2B
- pplx-decider vs Vela 2.0
- Strands Decider 2B vs Jev
- Jev vs Vela 2.0
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/pplx-decider-vs-typesafe-jev.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/pplx-decider.json·/api/v1/tools/typesafe-jev.json - From a terminal
anchor compare pplx-decider typesafe-jev(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "pplx-decider", "b": "typesafe-jev"}at/mcp, no key