Head to head · Inference decision · October 2026 research run

Celeris-1 Decision vs Jev

Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Celeris-1 Decision's 49.3 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do inference decision.

Which one, for what

Celeris-1 Decision D

Good for Multimodal classification, routing and bounded decisions with probabilities and optional explanations

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

Early-access terms and capacity-dependent workspace activation

Jev B

Good for High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 40
  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 60
  • Security & auth, 53 against 45
  • Maintenance & community, 64 against 40

Watch for

Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCeleris-1 DecisionJevEdge
Reliability16%204060Jev +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26087Jev +27
Agent ergonomics13%16.28084Jev +4
Security & auth14%17.54553Jev +8
Payments & pricing10%12.52020even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84064Jev +24
Transparency & trust7%8.85356Jev +3
Negative events≤1500
Total49.3 · D62.1 · B

Facts side by side

FactCeleris-1 DecisionJev
KindModel APIModel API
VendorCeleris (Marqo Inc)TypeSafe AI
Hosted endpointhttps://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemonehttps://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
Price for inference decisionfreenot published
x402nono
LicenceProprietary hosted model under Celeris terms of serviceProprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-082026-09-26
Terms last updated2026-09-08no date given
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-23no date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes
Popularitynone15 stars
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Celeris-1 Decision

Typed probabilities, image inputs and optional explanations suit routing and classification inside an agent. Both System One and OpenAI Decisions request formats are documented. The service remains early access under its terms, activation can queue, and prepaid credit expires after 30 days. The published accuracy and latency figures are Celeris measurements, not Anchor Terminal tests.

Jev

Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.

Before you call either

Celeris-1 Decision

  1. Use the decision model path and matching model field. This model has no chat, Responses or models endpoint.
  2. Use at most 512 questions per request, or 64 with explanations. Both endpoints reject streaming.
  3. Preserve x_celeris in a custom Jev SDK response model when reading explanations. The default response type drops it.
  4. Retry 429 with Retry-After and backoff. Stop on 402 until workspace credit is replenished.
  5. Read usage.input_tokens for cost, including images and request overhead. Track credit expiry separately from token consumption.

Jev

  1. Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
  2. Pin jev-1.13.0 instead of jev-latest once you've tuned confidence thresholds
  3. Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
  4. Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
  5. Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Celeris-1 Decision or Jev?

Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Celeris-1 Decision's 49.3 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Do Celeris-1 Decision and Jev need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Celeris-1 Decision and Jev without installing anything?

Yes. Celeris-1 Decision has a hosted endpoint at https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemone and Jev at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone.

Other comparisons with Celeris-1 Decision or Jev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.