Head to head · Inference decision · October 2026 research run
Celeris-1 Decision vs Jev
Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Celeris-1 Decision's 49.3 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do inference decision.
Which one, for what
Good for Multimodal classification, routing and bounded decisions with probabilities and optional explanations
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Early-access terms and capacity-dependent workspace activation
Jev B
Good for High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 87 against 60
- Security & auth, 53 against 45
- Maintenance & community, 64 against 40
Watch for
Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Celeris-1 Decision | Jev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 60 | Jev +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 87 | Jev +27 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 84 | Jev +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 53 | Jev +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 40 | 64 | Jev +24 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 56 | Jev +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 49.3 · D | 62.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Celeris-1 Decision | Jev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Celeris (Marqo Inc) | TypeSafe AI |
| Hosted endpoint | https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemone | https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| Price for inference decision | free | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted model under Celeris terms of service | Proprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-09-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-08 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-23 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | none | 15 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Celeris-1 Decision
Typed probabilities, image inputs and optional explanations suit routing and classification inside an agent. Both System One and OpenAI Decisions request formats are documented. The service remains early access under its terms, activation can queue, and prepaid credit expires after 30 days. The published accuracy and latency figures are Celeris measurements, not Anchor Terminal tests.
Jev
Typed answers with probabilities for noul, choice and score questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found.
Before you call either
Celeris-1 Decision
- Use the decision model path and matching model field. This model has no chat, Responses or models endpoint.
- Use at most 512 questions per request, or 64 with explanations. Both endpoints reject streaming.
- Preserve x_celeris in a custom Jev SDK response model when reading explanations. The default response type drops it.
- Retry 429 with Retry-After and backoff. Stop on 402 until workspace credit is replenished.
- Read usage.input_tokens for cost, including images and request overhead. Track credit expiry separately from token consumption.
Jev
- Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once
- Pin
jev-1.13.0instead ofjev-latestonce you've tuned confidence thresholds - Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand
- Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens
- Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Celeris-1 Decision or Jev?
Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Celeris-1 Decision's 49.3 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Celeris-1 Decision and Jev need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Celeris-1 Decision and Jev without installing anything?
Yes. Celeris-1 Decision has a hosted endpoint at https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemone and Jev at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone.
Other comparisons with Celeris-1 Decision or Jev
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Clef
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Laya
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Decider
- Celeris-1 Decision vs GLiClass
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Kev
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Liquid d1
- Celeris-1 Decision vs OpenAI Decisions API
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Strands Decider 2B
- Celeris-1 Decision vs Vela 2.0
- Clef vs Jev
- Laya vs Jev
- Decider vs Jev
- GLiClass vs Jev
- Kev vs Jev
- Liquid d1 vs Jev
- OpenAI Decisions API vs Jev
- Strands Decider 2B vs Jev
- Jev vs Vela 2.0
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/celeris-1-decision-vs-typesafe-jev.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/celeris-1-decision.json·/api/v1/tools/typesafe-jev.json - From a terminal
anchor compare celeris-1-decision typesafe-jev(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "celeris-1-decision", "b": "typesafe-jev"}at/mcp, no key