Head to head · Inference decision · October 2026 research run

Celeris-1 Decision vs Vela 2.0

Vela 2.0 scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Celeris-1 Decision's 49.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Celeris-1 Decision leads on transparency & trust. Both do inference decision. Celeris-1 Decision is cheaper for inference decision, $0 against $0 per 1M tokens.

Which one, for what

Celeris-1 Decision D

Good for Multimodal classification, routing and bounded decisions with probabilities and optional explanations

Ahead on

  • Transparency & trust, 53 against 48

Also in its favour

  • Cheaper for inference decision, $0 against $0 per 1M tokens
  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Early-access terms and capacity-dependent workspace activation

Vela 2.0 B

Good for Self-hosted routing and guardrail checks in one call, where span offsets for personal data or unsupported claims matter.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 57 against 40
  • Schema & documentation, 78 against 60
  • Security & auth, 60 against 45
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 84 against 40

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

No version tags on the four Hub repositories, and the 4B and 9B weights were replaced in place on 3 October 2026

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCeleris-1 DecisionVela 2.0Edge
Reliability16%204057Vela 2.0 +17
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26078Vela 2.0 +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.28079Celeris-1 Decision +1
Security & auth14%17.54560Vela 2.0 +15
Payments & pricing10%12.52060Vela 2.0 +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84084Vela 2.0 +44
Transparency & trust7%8.85348Celeris-1 Decision +5
Negative events≤1500
Total49.3 · D66.5 · B

Facts side by side

FactCeleris-1 DecisionVela 2.0
KindModel APIModel API
VendorCeleris (Marqo Inc)vLLM Semantic Router project and KR Labs
Hosted endpointhttps://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemoneno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPay per useFree
Price for inference decisionfreefree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary hosted model under Celeris terms of serviceApache-2.0 (weights, code and documentation). The 0.3B's tokeniser keeps the Gemma Terms of Use, and training data keeps its own licences
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-082026-10-06
Terms last updated2026-09-08no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-23no document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularitynone6.1k stars

Verdicts

Celeris-1 Decision

Typed probabilities, image inputs and optional explanations suit routing and classification inside an agent. Both System One and OpenAI Decisions request formats are documented. The service remains early access under its terms, activation can queue, and prepaid credit expires after 30 days. The published accuracy and latency figures are Celeris measurements, not Anchor Terminal tests.

Vela 2.0

One self-hosted call answers routing, prompt-attack, personal-data and unsupported-claim questions with probabilities and character offsets, under Apache-2.0 with SHA-256 manifests. The models are days old and carry no Hub version tags, and the three larger sizes keep 74 to 89 per cent of their Decision 2.0 bases on the Jev Decision Index by the authors' figures.

Before you call either

Celeris-1 Decision

  1. Use the decision model path and matching model field. This model has no chat, Responses or models endpoint.
  2. Use at most 512 questions per request, or 64 with explanations. Both endpoints reject streaming.
  3. Preserve x_celeris in a custom Jev SDK response model when reading explanations. The default response type drops it.
  4. Retry 429 with Retry-After and backoff. Stop on 402 until workspace credit is replenished.
  5. Read usage.input_tokens for cost, including images and request overhead. Track credit expiry separately from token consumption.

Vela 2.0

  1. Pin a commit hash with revision= when loading from the Hub. The repositories have no tags and main has changed since launch
  2. Send the served name in model, for example vllm-sr/Vela-2.0-4B. The bundled server answers 422 to any other name
  3. Name span questions pii, halu or toxic, or set "head": "router", to get the trained router head. Other labels go to the broad head
  4. Keep input under 16,384 tokens a sequence (8,192 on the 0.3B). The bundled server answers 413 when the questions alone don't fit
  5. Set VELA2_API_KEY before binding the bundled server beyond 127.0.0.1, and keep the model runtime on a trusted network

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Celeris-1 Decision or Vela 2.0?

Vela 2.0 scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Celeris-1 Decision's 49.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Celeris-1 Decision leads on transparency & trust.

Which is cheaper for inference decision, Celeris-1 Decision or Vela 2.0?

Celeris-1 Decision, at free against free for Vela 2.0. These are the vendors' published prices for the job.

Do Celeris-1 Decision and Vela 2.0 need an API key?

Celeris-1 Decision needs an API key. Vela 2.0 needs no key.

Can an agent call Celeris-1 Decision and Vela 2.0 without installing anything?

Celeris-1 Decision has a hosted endpoint at https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemone. No hosted endpoint is listed for Vela 2.0.

Are Celeris-1 Decision and Vela 2.0 open source?

No open-source release is listed for Celeris-1 Decision. Vela 2.0 is open source (Apache-2.0 (weights, code and documentation). The 0.3B's tokeniser keeps the Gemma Terms of Use, and training data keeps its own licences).

Other comparisons with Celeris-1 Decision or Vela 2.0

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.