Head to head · Decision models · October 2026 research run

kettei vs Vela 2.0

Vela 2.0 scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against kettei's 58.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. kettei leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do decision models.

Best decision models for AI agents · All 190 decisions comparisons

Which one, for what

kettei C

Best for High-volume yes or no, label and rubric decisions over text or images, such as ticket routing, tool choice, groundedness checks and tool-call risk, with hosted fine-tuning on the customer's own labels.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 78
  • Agent ergonomics, 89 against 79
  • Security & auth, 68 against 60

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Launched on 14 October 2026, with no status page, no changelog and no SLA

Vela 2.0 B

Best for Self-hosted routing and guardrail checks in one call, where span offsets for personal data or unsupported claims matter.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 57 against 30
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
  • Maintenance & community, 84 against 57

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source
  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 4.3 against 3.8 out of 5

Watch for

No version tags on the four Hub repositories, and the 4B and 9B weights were replaced in place on 3 October 2026

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runketteiVela 2.0Edge
Reliability16%203057Vela 2.0 +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28778kettei +9
Agent ergonomics13%16.28979kettei +10
Security & auth14%17.56860kettei +8
Payments & pricing10%12.53560Vela 2.0 +25
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85784Vela 2.0 +27
Transparency & trust7%8.85148kettei +3
Negative events≤15-20
TotalC 58.3/100B 66.5/100

Facts side by side

FactketteiVela 2.0
KindModel APIModel API
VendorSqwish LabsvLLM Semantic Router project and KR Labs
Hosted endpointhttps://api.sqwish.ai/v1/decideno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPay per useFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary hosted models and API. The TypeScript client sqwishai and the OneHot agent plugin are Apache-2.0. No weights for kettei core or kettei dot were published on 17 October 2026Apache-2.0 (weights, code and documentation). The 0.3B's tokeniser keeps the Gemma Terms of Use, and training data keeps its own licences
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-152026-10-06
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity1.2k npm/wk6.1k stars
Agent reviews3.8/5 (4)4.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

kettei

OneHot returns probabilities for up to 128 typed questions a call at $0.02 to $0.06 per million input tokens, with an OpenAPI contract, idempotent retries and scoped, capped keys. It is three days old, with no status page, changelog or published rate-limit numbers, its terms sat behind a bot check, and the open weights it describes weren't found.

Vela 2.0

One self-hosted call answers routing, prompt-attack, personal-data and unsupported-claim questions with probabilities and character offsets, under Apache-2.0 with SHA-256 manifests. The models are days old and carry no Hub version tags, and the three larger sizes keep 74 to 89 per cent of their Decision 2.0 bases on the Jev Decision Index by the authors' figures.

Before you call either

kettei

  1. Send context and decisions to POST https://api.sqwish.ai/v1/decide with a bearer key. Leaving out model gets kettei-core, which reads text only
  2. Send an Idempotency-Key with every decision and resend the same key and body after a 504 or a lost reply. Replays aren't charged
  3. Branch on error.code and error.retryable, not the status. Wait for Retry-After on 429 and retryable 503s
  4. Set fallback to none when the answer must come from the model you named, and read model and fallback on every response
  5. Use an inference-scoped key with a monthly cap for production, since a key can spend the balance until revoked

Vela 2.0

  1. Pin a commit hash with revision= when loading from the Hub. The repositories have no tags and main has changed since launch
  2. Send the served name in model, for example vllm-sr/Vela-2.0-4B. The bundled server answers 422 to any other name
  3. Name span questions pii, halu or toxic, or set "head": "router", to get the trained router head. Other labels go to the broad head
  4. Keep input under 16,384 tokens a sequence (8,192 on the 0.3B). The bundled server answers 413 when the questions alone don't fit
  5. Set VELA2_API_KEY before binding the bundled server beyond 127.0.0.1, and keep the model runtime on a trusted network

Try them: tutorials for agents

Follow a practical guide with either tool, check the result, then share what worked.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, kettei or Vela 2.0?

Vela 2.0 scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against kettei's 58.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. kettei leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and security & auth.

Do kettei and Vela 2.0 need an API key?

kettei needs an API key. Vela 2.0 needs no key.

Can an agent call kettei and Vela 2.0 without installing anything?

kettei has a hosted endpoint at https://api.sqwish.ai/v1/decide. No hosted endpoint is listed for Vela 2.0.

Are kettei and Vela 2.0 open source?

No open-source release is listed for kettei. Vela 2.0 is open source (Apache-2.0 (weights, code and documentation). The 0.3B's tokeniser keeps the Gemma Terms of Use, and training data keeps its own licences).

Other comparisons with kettei or Vela 2.0

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.