Head to head · Inference decision · October 2026 research run

OpenAI Decisions API vs Vela 2.0

OpenAI Decisions API scores 71.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Vela 2.0's 66.5 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Vela 2.0 leads on payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do inference decision.

Which one, for what

OpenAI Decisions API BB

Good for High-volume yes or no checks, routing among fixed options and rubric scoring over text and images, for teams already on an OpenAI key.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 89 against 78
  • Agent ergonomics, 87 against 79
  • Security & auth, 83 against 60
  • Transparency & trust, 83 against 48

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Public beta released on 6 October 2026. The guide expects general availability in the coming weeks and gives no date

Vela 2.0 B

Good for Self-hosted routing and guardrail checks in one call, where span offsets for personal data or unsupported claims matter.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 84 against 77

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

No version tags on the four Hub repositories, and the 4B and 9B weights were replaced in place on 3 October 2026

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOpenAI Decisions APIVela 2.0Edge
Reliability16%205357Vela 2.0 +4
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28978OpenAI Decisions API +11
Agent ergonomics13%16.28779OpenAI Decisions API +8
Security & auth14%17.58360OpenAI Decisions API +23
Payments & pricing10%12.53060Vela 2.0 +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87784Vela 2.0 +7
Transparency & trust7%8.88348OpenAI Decisions API +35
Negative events≤1500
Total71.5 · BB66.5 · B

Facts side by side

FactOpenAI Decisions APIVela 2.0
KindModel APIModel API
VendorOpenAIvLLM Semantic Router project and KR Labs
Hosted endpointhttps://api.openai.com/v1/decisionsno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPay per useFree
Price for inference decision$0.10 per 1M tokensfree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under OpenAI's services agreement. The official SDKs are Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 (weights, code and documentation). The 0.3B's tokeniser keeps the Gemma Terms of Use, and training data keeps its own licences
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-062026-10-06
Terms last updatedcouldn't be readno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be readno document linked
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be read
Popularity32k stars6.1k stars

Verdicts

OpenAI Decisions API

Typed predicate, choice and score answers with probabilities, up to 200 questions a call, at $0.10 per million input tokens with no output charge. It is a public beta released on 6 October 2026, with one model alias, no dated snapshot, no Batch route and no SLA found.

Vela 2.0

One self-hosted call answers routing, prompt-attack, personal-data and unsupported-claim questions with probabilities and character offsets, under Apache-2.0 with SHA-256 manifests. The models are days old and carry no Hub version tags, and the three larger sizes keep 74 to 89 per cent of their Decision 2.0 bases on the Jev Decision Index by the authors' figures.

Before you call either

OpenAI Decisions API

  1. Put independent questions about one input in a single questions array. Send a separate request when a question depends on an earlier answer
  2. Check each answer's type before reading it. A question can come back as refusal while the others in the same request are answered
  3. Encode images as base64 data URLs. Hosted URLs and file_id inputs are rejected
  4. Give a choice question a fallback value such as other, and set thresholds from your own labelled examples
  5. Use Python SDK 3.26.0 or JavaScript 7.30.0 or later, and follow Retry-After on 429 and 503

Vela 2.0

  1. Pin a commit hash with revision= when loading from the Hub. The repositories have no tags and main has changed since launch
  2. Send the served name in model, for example vllm-sr/Vela-2.0-4B. The bundled server answers 422 to any other name
  3. Name span questions pii, halu or toxic, or set "head": "router", to get the trained router head. Other labels go to the broad head
  4. Keep input under 16,384 tokens a sequence (8,192 on the 0.3B). The bundled server answers 413 when the questions alone don't fit
  5. Set VELA2_API_KEY before binding the bundled server beyond 127.0.0.1, and keep the model runtime on a trusted network

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, OpenAI Decisions API or Vela 2.0?

OpenAI Decisions API scores 71.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Vela 2.0's 66.5 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Vela 2.0 leads on payments & pricing and maintenance & community.

Which is cheaper for inference decision, OpenAI Decisions API or Vela 2.0?

Vela 2.0, at free against $0.10 per 1M tokens for OpenAI Decisions API. These are the vendors' published prices for the job.

Do OpenAI Decisions API and Vela 2.0 need an API key?

OpenAI Decisions API needs an API key. Vela 2.0 needs no key.

Can an agent call OpenAI Decisions API and Vela 2.0 without installing anything?

OpenAI Decisions API has a hosted endpoint at https://api.openai.com/v1/decisions. No hosted endpoint is listed for Vela 2.0.

Are OpenAI Decisions API and Vela 2.0 open source?

No open-source release is listed for OpenAI Decisions API. Vela 2.0 is open source (Apache-2.0 (weights, code and documentation). The 0.3B's tokeniser keeps the Gemma Terms of Use, and training data keeps its own licences).

Other comparisons with OpenAI Decisions API or Vela 2.0

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.