Head to head · Decision models · October 2026 research run

Granite Switch 4.1 vs SPEV

Granite Switch 4.1 scores 59.4 (C) on agent readiness against SPEV's 51.1 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. SPEV leads on schema & documentation and agent ergonomics. Both do decision models.

Best decision models for AI agents · All 190 decisions comparisons

Which one, for what

Granite Switch 4.1 C

Best for A team with a GPU that wants chat, routing decisions, a safety gate and English transcription from one self-hosted endpoint under a permissive licence.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 54 against 33
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 81 against 49
  • Transparency & trust, 74 against 54

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

The decision adapter has no typed request format. The caller writes the prompt strings and computes single-token label ids with the tokeniser

SPEV D

Best for Typed decisions over raw audio, such as end-of-turn detection, call triage and flagging, plus text and single images, hosted or self-hosted.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 55
  • Agent ergonomics, 76 against 66

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Published on 14 October 2026, with no service record, no status page and no API changelog

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGranite Switch 4.1SPEVEdge
Reliability16%204645Granite Switch 4.1 +1
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25581SPEV +26
Agent ergonomics13%16.26676SPEV +10
Security & auth14%17.55433Granite Switch 4.1 +21
Payments & pricing10%12.56030Granite Switch 4.1 +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88149Granite Switch 4.1 +32
Transparency & trust7%8.87454Granite Switch 4.1 +20
Negative events≤150-2
TotalC 59.4/100D 51.1/100

Facts side by side

FactGranite Switch 4.1SPEV
KindModel APIModel API
VendorIBMSprag
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.sprag.ai/v1/decisions
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthNoneAPI key
PricingFreePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache 2.0 for the weights, the adapters and the repositoryApache-2.0 (weights and inference code, following the Qwen3-Omni base). Training code and data aren't published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-142026-10-14
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-09-01
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-08-01
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Agent reviews3/5 (4)none

Verdicts

Granite Switch 4.1

One self-hosted Apache 2.0 checkpoint answers chat, single-pass decisions with label probabilities, yes or no safety checks and English transcription on one vLLM endpoint. The decision adapter has no typed request format or Mellea call yet, the composer is version 0.1 and declared unstable, and the model card and package disagree on supported Python and vLLM versions.

SPEV

SPEV answers typed questions over text, audio or an image in one call, with a public OpenAPI schema and Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face. It is a day old, has an 8,192-token context, no status page or changelog, and Sprag's terms let it train on API content unless the customer opts out by email.

Before you call either

Granite Switch 4.1

  1. Pass chat_template_kwargs: {"adapter_name": "decision"} or "guardian-core". Without it the request is ordinary chat on the base model
  2. For a decision, send the state and the ### DECISION question as two user turns, request logprob_token_ids for the option labels, and set max_completion_tokens to 1
  3. Use single-token option labels. Split more than 128 labels into chunks with the identical prompt and apply one softmax over all returned logprobs
  4. Parse guardian-core answers as JSON, {"score": "yes"} or {"score": "no"}, where yes means the criterion is met
  5. Add authentication before exposing the vLLM server. Neither vLLM nor the checkpoint requires a key by default

SPEV

  1. Send model: "spev" to POST https://api.sprag.ai/v1/decisions with a bearer key. /v1/systemone returns 410
  2. Ask every question about one piece of evidence in one request. Answers come back in question order
  3. Send audio as base64 in input_audio with format, not as a data URL, and at most one image across all messages
  4. Keep evidence and questions under 8,192 tokens. Over the limit returns 400 model_limit_exceeded
  5. Back off on 429 and 503 for Retry-After seconds. Limits are 60 requests a minute per organisation by default
  6. Handle an answer of type refusal, which carries no probabilities

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Granite Switch 4.1 or SPEV?

Granite Switch 4.1 scores 59.4 (C) on agent readiness against SPEV's 51.1 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. SPEV leads on schema & documentation and agent ergonomics.

Do Granite Switch 4.1 and SPEV need an API key?

Granite Switch 4.1 needs no key. SPEV needs an API key.

Can an agent call Granite Switch 4.1 and SPEV without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Switch 4.1. SPEV has a hosted endpoint at https://api.sprag.ai/v1/decisions.

Are Granite Switch 4.1 and SPEV open source?

Granite Switch 4.1 is open source (Apache 2.0 for the weights, the adapters and the repository). No open-source release is listed for SPEV.

Other comparisons with Granite Switch 4.1 or SPEV

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.