Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Tink vs Yapily
Tink scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against Yapily's 57.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Yapily leads on schema & documentation. Both do bank accounts.
Which one, for what
Tink B
Good for A company with a contract that needs account, balance and transaction data or bank payments across European markets under Tink's own licences.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 62 against 55
- Security & auth, 63 against 37
- Transparency & trust, 90 against 71
Watch for
No public prices. The pricing page lists Standard as Contact us and Enterprise as Custom pricing, and the FAQ says there is no pay-per-use option
Yapily C
Good for UK and EEA data and payments from one API, for builders who want docs an agent can read in one fetch.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 73
Watch for
No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Tink | Yapily | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 62 | 55 | Tink +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 73 | 88 | Yapily +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 77 | Yapily +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 63 | 37 | Tink +26 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 10 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 69 | 67 | Tink +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 90 | 71 | Tink +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 62.5 · B | 57.6 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Tink | Yapily |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Tink AB (Visa) | Yapily |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.tink.com | https://api.yapily.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Tink's Master Service Agreement. The Tink Link SDKs for iOS and Android on GitHub are MIT | MIT (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2025-06-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2022-12-05 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | none | 14 stars, 50 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Tink
OAuth client credentials with per-endpoint scopes, token-paged data endpoints and a published MSA, DPA, SLA and sub-processor list. No price is public, live access needs a sales contract, and the API reference has no downloadable spec or published rate-limit numbers.
Yapily
llms.txt, llms-full.txt, a no-auth docs MCP server and an OpenAPI file. No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form.
Before you call either
Tink
- Request a client token at https://api.tink.com/api/v1/oauth/token, create a user, request an authorisation grant for that user, then exchange the code for a user token.
- Renew tokens on a timer. Client tokens last 30 minutes and user tokens two hours, and the client credentials flow returns no refresh token.
- Send the account holder through Tink Link in a browser. Bank consent cannot be completed by API calls alone.
- Read transactions from /data/v2/transactions with
pageSizeup to 100 and follownextPageToken. - Send an Idempotency-Key header on consent and payment writes. Keys are kept for 24 hours.
Yapily
- Read llms-full.txt once and cache it; it's the whole documentation in one fetch
- Add the Modelo sandbox in the Console before your first account-auth-request, or institutions comes back empty
- Treat a 403 on a data call as a revoked or expired consent and send the user back through authorisation
- Check the error source field first; USER and INSTITUTION failures won't clear on retry
- In the UK, call extend-consent with lastConfirmedAt before the reconfirmBy date, or the consent lapses at 90 days
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Tink or Yapily?
Tink scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against Yapily's 57.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Yapily leads on schema & documentation.
Do Tink and Yapily need an API key?
Tink uses an OAuth sign-in. Yapily needs an API key.
Can an agent call Tink and Yapily without installing anything?
Yes. Tink has a hosted endpoint at https://api.tink.com and Yapily at https://api.yapily.com.
Other comparisons with Tink or Yapily
- Belvo vs Tink
- Belvo vs Yapily
- Enable Banking vs Tink
- Enable Banking vs Yapily
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Tink
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Yapily
- Plaid vs Tink
- Plaid vs Yapily
- Salt Edge Account Information vs Tink
- Salt Edge Account Information vs Yapily
- Teller vs Tink
- Teller vs Yapily
- Tink vs TrueLayer
- TrueLayer vs Yapily
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/tink-vs-yapily.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/tink.json·/api/v1/tools/yapily.json - From a terminal
anchor compare tink yapily(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "tink", "b": "yapily"}at/mcp, no key