Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Enable Banking vs Yapily
Yapily has a score of 57.8 (C) against Enable Banking's 47.3 (D). Both do bank accounts. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 34 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Enable Banking for
- security & auth (+10)
- payments & pricing (+10)
Pick Yapily for
- reliability (+22)
- schema & documentation (+34)
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- transparency & trust (+22)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enable Banking | Yapily | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 33 | 55 | Yapily +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 54 | 88 | Yapily +34 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 77 | Yapily +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 37 | Enable Banking +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 10 | Enable Banking +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 67 | 67 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 73 | Yapily +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 47.3 · D | 57.8 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enable Banking | Yapily |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enable Banking | Yapily |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.enablebanking.com | https://api.yapily.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (code samples) | MIT (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2025-06-30 |
| Popularity | none | 14 stars, 50 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Enable Banking
Restricted mode gives live data for your own whitelisted accounts before any contract. No public prices and a minimum monthly invoice.
Yapily
llms.txt, llms-full.txt, a no-auth docs MCP server and an OpenAPI file. No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form.
Before you call either
Enable Banking
- Mint one JWT per run with exp under 24 hours; don't reuse a long-lived token across sessions
- Test against the Mock ASPSP first; bank sandboxes fail for reasons that aren't yours
- Pass the bank's maximum_consent_validity as valid_until, usually 180 days, or you'll be back at the bank sooner
- On 429 ASPSP_RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED stop until tomorrow; it's the bank's 4-a-day cap
- Follow continuation_key until it's absent to get every transaction
Yapily
- Read llms-full.txt once and cache it; it's the whole documentation in one fetch
- Add the Modelo sandbox in the Console before your first account-auth-request, or institutions comes back empty
- Treat a 403 on a data call as a revoked or expired consent and send the user back through authorisation
- Check the error source field first; USER and INSTITUTION failures won't clear on retry
- In the UK, call extend-consent with lastConfirmedAt before the reconfirmBy date, or the consent lapses at 90 days
Other comparisons with Enable Banking or Yapily
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/enable-banking.json·/api/v1/tools/yapily.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/enable-banking-vs-yapily.md