Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Enable Banking vs GoCardless Bank Account Data
Enable Banking has a score of 47.3 (D) against GoCardless Bank Account Data's 41.9 (E). Both do bank accounts. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 64 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Enable Banking for
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+64)
Pick GoCardless Bank Account Data for
- reliability (+11)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enable Banking | GoCardless Bank Account Data | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 33 | 44 | GoCardless Bank Account Data +11 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 54 | 54 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 57 | Enable Banking +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 50 | GoCardless Bank Account Data +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 10 | Enable Banking +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 67 | 3 | Enable Banking +64 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 55 | GoCardless Bank Account Data +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 47.3 · D | 41.9 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enable Banking | GoCardless Bank Account Data |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enable Banking | GoCardless |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.enablebanking.com | https://bankaccountdata.gocardless.com/api/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (code samples) | MIT (client libraries, unmaintained) |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2025-04-07 |
| Popularity | none | 88 stars, 29k npm/wk, 4.3k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Enable Banking
Restricted mode gives live data for your own whitelisted accounts before any contract. No public prices and a minimum monthly invoice.
GoCardless Bank Account Data
UK plus every PSD2 country, up to 24 months of history, one API shape for all of them. No public price and no confirmed free plan.
Before you call either
Enable Banking
- Mint one JWT per run with exp under 24 hours; don't reuse a long-lived token across sessions
- Test against the Mock ASPSP first; bank sandboxes fail for reasons that aren't yours
- Pass the bank's maximum_consent_validity as valid_until, usually 180 days, or you'll be back at the bank sooner
- On 429 ASPSP_RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED stop until tomorrow; it's the bank's 4-a-day cap
- Follow continuation_key until it's absent to get every transaction
GoCardless Bank Account Data
- Cache the access token for its 24 hours and use /api/v2/token/refresh/ rather than minting a new pair each run
- Create the end user agreement before the requisition when you need other than 90 days of history or access
- Read the per-account rate limit headers; on 429 wait for the account reset time, since some banks allow 4 calls a day
- Poll /api/v2/accounts/{id}/ until status is READY before asking for transactions
- Call the REST endpoints directly; the Nordigen SDKs still install but get no fixes
Other comparisons with Enable Banking or GoCardless Bank Account Data
- Enable Banking vs Plaid
- Enable Banking vs Salt Edge Account Information
- Enable Banking vs Teller
- Enable Banking vs TrueLayer
- Enable Banking vs Yapily
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Plaid
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Salt Edge Account Information
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Teller
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs TrueLayer
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Yapily